赞美或抱怨:对社区警务实践的评价

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1108/pijpsm-01-2023-0011
William Pelfrey, Steven Keener
{"title":"赞美或抱怨:对社区警务实践的评价","authors":"William Pelfrey, Steven Keener","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-01-2023-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This research study evaluates an innovative community-oriented policing program, designed to enhance officer accountability, thereby informing the scholarly community and agency decision-makers. Design/methodology/approach A multi-method approach was employed, leveraging pre- and post-implementation data collection phases. Data were collected via surveys of officers and focus groups with officers, as well as interviews with agency decision-makers. Findings While officers were originally resistant to the STOP Card program, postimplementation perceptions, evinced through both survey and focus group data, were supportive. Agency administrators were consistently supportive of the initiative. Originality/value This is a novel program, implemented by a university police agency set in an urban area. The utility of this and similar efforts may influence agency initiatives.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice\",\"authors\":\"William Pelfrey, Steven Keener\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pijpsm-01-2023-0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This research study evaluates an innovative community-oriented policing program, designed to enhance officer accountability, thereby informing the scholarly community and agency decision-makers. Design/methodology/approach A multi-method approach was employed, leveraging pre- and post-implementation data collection phases. Data were collected via surveys of officers and focus groups with officers, as well as interviews with agency decision-makers. Findings While officers were originally resistant to the STOP Card program, postimplementation perceptions, evinced through both survey and focus group data, were supportive. Agency administrators were consistently supportive of the initiative. Originality/value This is a novel program, implemented by a university police agency set in an urban area. The utility of this and similar efforts may influence agency initiatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-01-2023-0011\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-01-2023-0011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了一个创新的面向社区的警务计划,旨在提高官员的问责制,从而为学术界和机构决策者提供信息。设计/方法/方法采用多方法方法,利用实施前和实施后的数据收集阶段。数据是通过对警务人员的调查和与警务人员的焦点小组讨论,以及与机构决策者的访谈收集的。虽然警官们最初对停止卡计划持抵制态度,但通过调查和焦点小组数据证明,实施后的看法是支持的。机构行政人员一贯支持这项倡议。创意/价值这是一个新颖的项目,由设在城市地区的大学警察机构实施。这种和类似努力的效用可能会影响机构的举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice
Purpose This research study evaluates an innovative community-oriented policing program, designed to enhance officer accountability, thereby informing the scholarly community and agency decision-makers. Design/methodology/approach A multi-method approach was employed, leveraging pre- and post-implementation data collection phases. Data were collected via surveys of officers and focus groups with officers, as well as interviews with agency decision-makers. Findings While officers were originally resistant to the STOP Card program, postimplementation perceptions, evinced through both survey and focus group data, were supportive. Agency administrators were consistently supportive of the initiative. Originality/value This is a novel program, implemented by a university police agency set in an urban area. The utility of this and similar efforts may influence agency initiatives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
期刊最新文献
How can we help law enforcement agencies learn? A look at CALEA police accreditation Crime on the mass transit system in Hong Kong: a hotspots and harmspots trajectory approach Does Weisburd's law of crime concentration apply to traffic crashes? Implications for policing and traffic law enforcement How the police conceptualise and view the relevance of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) for policing: a qualitative investigation Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1