弧- IMRT计划两种预处理验证方法的比较

Marianna Aromando, Samantha Cornacchia, Marialuisa Doronzo, Maria Urbano, Giuseppe Guglielmi
{"title":"弧- IMRT计划两种预处理验证方法的比较","authors":"Marianna Aromando, Samantha Cornacchia, Marialuisa Doronzo, Maria Urbano, Giuseppe Guglielmi","doi":"10.36017/jahc202351127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In radiotherapy, the application of the IMRT arc technique, a special technique of external beam irradiation, while providing greater ballistic accuracy and personalization of treatment, as well as better speed of execution, requires special attention to the development of the treatment plan and its verification.Therefore, tools and methods of physical-health analysis that allow verification of the accuracy of the delivery of the radiant beam in the stages prior to treatment are essential. At the unit of Medical Physics at Dimiccoli Hospital Barletta, a prospective experimental study was conducted based on the comparison of two different methods of pre-treatment verification in patients treated for prostate cancer with the aim of increasing the performance of the treatment workflow.A comparative evaluation of gamma analysis results on images acquired with a 2D flat panel detector EPID (Electronic Portal Imaging Device) on the one hand and a 2D ionizing chambers detector on the other hand was conducted. The study sample included 38 patients undergoing radiotherapy with IMRT between December 2021 and October 2022, and each subject was studied and verified with both methods.The results of gamma analysis conducted with the two methods of pre-treatment verification of patients with prostate cancer are superimposable. In addition, with EPID we have a significant saving of machine time and thus allows an increase in the number of patients undergoing daily radiotherapy.In light of internationally accepted dosimetric and radiation protection accuracy standards according to Decree 101/2020, pre-treatment verification of dose distributions, using a 2D flat panel detection system (EPID), was found to be in line with waiting list reduction goals.","PeriodicalId":14873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Health Care","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two pre-treatment verification methods for arc – IMRT plans\",\"authors\":\"Marianna Aromando, Samantha Cornacchia, Marialuisa Doronzo, Maria Urbano, Giuseppe Guglielmi\",\"doi\":\"10.36017/jahc202351127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In radiotherapy, the application of the IMRT arc technique, a special technique of external beam irradiation, while providing greater ballistic accuracy and personalization of treatment, as well as better speed of execution, requires special attention to the development of the treatment plan and its verification.Therefore, tools and methods of physical-health analysis that allow verification of the accuracy of the delivery of the radiant beam in the stages prior to treatment are essential. At the unit of Medical Physics at Dimiccoli Hospital Barletta, a prospective experimental study was conducted based on the comparison of two different methods of pre-treatment verification in patients treated for prostate cancer with the aim of increasing the performance of the treatment workflow.A comparative evaluation of gamma analysis results on images acquired with a 2D flat panel detector EPID (Electronic Portal Imaging Device) on the one hand and a 2D ionizing chambers detector on the other hand was conducted. The study sample included 38 patients undergoing radiotherapy with IMRT between December 2021 and October 2022, and each subject was studied and verified with both methods.The results of gamma analysis conducted with the two methods of pre-treatment verification of patients with prostate cancer are superimposable. In addition, with EPID we have a significant saving of machine time and thus allows an increase in the number of patients undergoing daily radiotherapy.In light of internationally accepted dosimetric and radiation protection accuracy standards according to Decree 101/2020, pre-treatment verification of dose distributions, using a 2D flat panel detection system (EPID), was found to be in line with waiting list reduction goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Health Care\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202351127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36017/jahc202351127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在放射治疗中,IMRT弧线技术是一种特殊的外射技术,在提供更高的弹道精度和个性化治疗以及更好的执行速度的同时,需要特别注意治疗计划的制定及其验证。因此,身体健康分析的工具和方法必须能够在治疗前阶段验证辐射光束传输的准确性。在Barletta Dimiccoli医院的医学物理单元,为了提高治疗流程的性能,在比较前列腺癌患者治疗前验证的两种不同方法的基础上,进行了一项前瞻性实验研究。对二维平板探测器EPID (Electronic Portal Imaging Device)和二维电离室探测器采集的图像进行了伽玛分析结果的对比评价。研究样本包括在2021年12月至2022年10月期间接受IMRT放疗的38例患者,每个受试者都使用两种方法进行研究和验证。用两种方法对前列腺癌患者进行治疗前验证的伽马分析结果是重叠的。此外,有了EPID,我们大大节省了机器时间,从而增加了每天接受放疗的患者数量。根据国际公认的剂量学和辐射防护精度标准,根据第101/2020号法令,使用二维平板检测系统(EPID)对剂量分布进行预处理验证,发现符合减少等候名单的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of two pre-treatment verification methods for arc – IMRT plans
In radiotherapy, the application of the IMRT arc technique, a special technique of external beam irradiation, while providing greater ballistic accuracy and personalization of treatment, as well as better speed of execution, requires special attention to the development of the treatment plan and its verification.Therefore, tools and methods of physical-health analysis that allow verification of the accuracy of the delivery of the radiant beam in the stages prior to treatment are essential. At the unit of Medical Physics at Dimiccoli Hospital Barletta, a prospective experimental study was conducted based on the comparison of two different methods of pre-treatment verification in patients treated for prostate cancer with the aim of increasing the performance of the treatment workflow.A comparative evaluation of gamma analysis results on images acquired with a 2D flat panel detector EPID (Electronic Portal Imaging Device) on the one hand and a 2D ionizing chambers detector on the other hand was conducted. The study sample included 38 patients undergoing radiotherapy with IMRT between December 2021 and October 2022, and each subject was studied and verified with both methods.The results of gamma analysis conducted with the two methods of pre-treatment verification of patients with prostate cancer are superimposable. In addition, with EPID we have a significant saving of machine time and thus allows an increase in the number of patients undergoing daily radiotherapy.In light of internationally accepted dosimetric and radiation protection accuracy standards according to Decree 101/2020, pre-treatment verification of dose distributions, using a 2D flat panel detection system (EPID), was found to be in line with waiting list reduction goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advanced neuroimaging techniques in the clinical routine: A comprehensive MRI case study The revolution of photon-counting CT towards new horizons of diagnostic imaging Pharmacoeconomics and wound care. When therapeutic appropiateness and cost savings move in the same direction Investigating Clinical Risk Awareness in Speech Therapy Practice The patient positioning in the MR of the shoulder: advantages and disadvantages of the internal, external and neutral rotation of the arm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1