{"title":"阿达木单抗安全性:FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库分析","authors":"Buthainah Ghanem","doi":"10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to assess the safety profile of adalimumab and its biosimilars for each approved indication by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Method: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of AE reports documented from 2002 to 2022 in the FAERS database. This analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to investigate safety signals related to the disproportionate reporting of serious AEs for adalimumab and its biosimilars compared to currently available biological products for the same proposed indications. Results: A total of 543,873 AEs related to adalimumab treatment were reported, with 49.8% classified as serious. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported AE. Risk factors associated with serious AEs included age (≥60 years), male sex, and the concurrent use of adalimumab (ROR >1, P<0.05). Adalimumab exhibited a lower risk of serious AEs compared to abatacept, certolizumab, infliximab, or rituximab. Conversely, etanercept and ixekizumab showed lower odds of serious AEs than adalimumab (ROR <1, P<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest that adalimumab has a well-tolerated safety profile for approved indications when compared to currently available biological alternatives.","PeriodicalId":14719,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of Adalimumab: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database\",\"authors\":\"Buthainah Ghanem\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aims to assess the safety profile of adalimumab and its biosimilars for each approved indication by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Method: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of AE reports documented from 2002 to 2022 in the FAERS database. This analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to investigate safety signals related to the disproportionate reporting of serious AEs for adalimumab and its biosimilars compared to currently available biological products for the same proposed indications. Results: A total of 543,873 AEs related to adalimumab treatment were reported, with 49.8% classified as serious. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported AE. Risk factors associated with serious AEs included age (≥60 years), male sex, and the concurrent use of adalimumab (ROR >1, P<0.05). Adalimumab exhibited a lower risk of serious AEs compared to abatacept, certolizumab, infliximab, or rituximab. Conversely, etanercept and ixekizumab showed lower odds of serious AEs than adalimumab (ROR <1, P<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest that adalimumab has a well-tolerated safety profile for approved indications when compared to currently available biological alternatives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v16i3.629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety of Adalimumab: An Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database
Objective: This study aims to assess the safety profile of adalimumab and its biosimilars for each approved indication by analyzing adverse events (AEs) reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Method: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of AE reports documented from 2002 to 2022 in the FAERS database. This analysis included descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression analyses. We calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to investigate safety signals related to the disproportionate reporting of serious AEs for adalimumab and its biosimilars compared to currently available biological products for the same proposed indications. Results: A total of 543,873 AEs related to adalimumab treatment were reported, with 49.8% classified as serious. Hospitalization was the most frequently reported AE. Risk factors associated with serious AEs included age (≥60 years), male sex, and the concurrent use of adalimumab (ROR >1, P<0.05). Adalimumab exhibited a lower risk of serious AEs compared to abatacept, certolizumab, infliximab, or rituximab. Conversely, etanercept and ixekizumab showed lower odds of serious AEs than adalimumab (ROR <1, P<0.05). Conclusion: In summary, these findings suggest that adalimumab has a well-tolerated safety profile for approved indications when compared to currently available biological alternatives.
期刊介绍:
The Jordan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (JJPS) is a scientific, bi-annual, peer-reviewed publication that will focus on current topics of interest to the pharmaceutical community at large. Although the JJPS is intended to be of interest to pharmaceutical scientists, other healthy workers, and manufacturing processors will also find it most interesting and informative. Papers will cover basic pharmaceutical and applied research, scientific commentaries, as well as views, reviews. Topics on products will include manufacturing process, quality control, pharmaceutical engineering, pharmaceutical technology, and philosophies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences. The editorial advisory board would like to place an emphasis on new and innovative methods, technologies, and techniques for the pharmaceutical industry. The reader will find a broad range of important topics in this first issue.