{"title":"使用国家暴力死亡报告系统数据,2015-2019年女性亲密伴侣凶杀案中的枪支立法和枪支使用","authors":"Erica L. Gollub, Shirly Chen","doi":"10.1089/vio.2023.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Firearms are responsible for increasing proportions and frequencies of U.S. homicides, accounting for over half of female deaths related to intimate partner violence (IPV). We analyzed National Violent Death Reporting System data to evaluate the impact of state-based firearm legislation targeted to IPV perpetrators and intimate partner homicide (IPH) from 2015 to 2019. Using Centers for Disease Controls (CDCs) Restricted Access Database system, we extracted yearly incidence data and calculated average, state-specific, age-adjusted rates for female IPH for 18 eligible states. We developed firearm-to-non-firearm (F:NF) rate ratios (RRs) and compared them across states categorized into two levels of domestic violence-specific firearm restrictions. Rates of NF IPH served as a crude control for characteristics of the state population that might favor violence behavior. Most “low” restriction states demonstrated greater F:NF RRs than “high” states. The average female firearm IPH rate was 0.33 per 100K for “high” restriction states and 0.98 per 100K for “low” restriction states. The average F:NF RR for low restriction states was 1.91 and for high restriction states was 0.85. The data show a trend of decreased IPH with stronger IPV-specific state firearm legislation, but with some variability in femicide rates within firearm restriction category, pointing to numerous additional factors bearing on the association, including varying implementation and enforcement of existing legal provisions, geographic location, and state household gun ownership. The present analysis confirms the dramatic contribution of firearm fatalities to female intimate partner-related deaths—frequently doubling or tripling the state's rate of non-firearm female IPH.","PeriodicalId":45010,"journal":{"name":"Violence and Gender","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Firearm Legislation and Firearm Use in Female Intimate Partner Homicide Using National Violent Death Reporting System Data, 2015–2019\",\"authors\":\"Erica L. Gollub, Shirly Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/vio.2023.0022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Firearms are responsible for increasing proportions and frequencies of U.S. homicides, accounting for over half of female deaths related to intimate partner violence (IPV). We analyzed National Violent Death Reporting System data to evaluate the impact of state-based firearm legislation targeted to IPV perpetrators and intimate partner homicide (IPH) from 2015 to 2019. Using Centers for Disease Controls (CDCs) Restricted Access Database system, we extracted yearly incidence data and calculated average, state-specific, age-adjusted rates for female IPH for 18 eligible states. We developed firearm-to-non-firearm (F:NF) rate ratios (RRs) and compared them across states categorized into two levels of domestic violence-specific firearm restrictions. Rates of NF IPH served as a crude control for characteristics of the state population that might favor violence behavior. Most “low” restriction states demonstrated greater F:NF RRs than “high” states. The average female firearm IPH rate was 0.33 per 100K for “high” restriction states and 0.98 per 100K for “low” restriction states. The average F:NF RR for low restriction states was 1.91 and for high restriction states was 0.85. The data show a trend of decreased IPH with stronger IPV-specific state firearm legislation, but with some variability in femicide rates within firearm restriction category, pointing to numerous additional factors bearing on the association, including varying implementation and enforcement of existing legal provisions, geographic location, and state household gun ownership. The present analysis confirms the dramatic contribution of firearm fatalities to female intimate partner-related deaths—frequently doubling or tripling the state's rate of non-firearm female IPH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence and Gender\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence and Gender\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2023.0022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence and Gender","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2023.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Firearm Legislation and Firearm Use in Female Intimate Partner Homicide Using National Violent Death Reporting System Data, 2015–2019
Firearms are responsible for increasing proportions and frequencies of U.S. homicides, accounting for over half of female deaths related to intimate partner violence (IPV). We analyzed National Violent Death Reporting System data to evaluate the impact of state-based firearm legislation targeted to IPV perpetrators and intimate partner homicide (IPH) from 2015 to 2019. Using Centers for Disease Controls (CDCs) Restricted Access Database system, we extracted yearly incidence data and calculated average, state-specific, age-adjusted rates for female IPH for 18 eligible states. We developed firearm-to-non-firearm (F:NF) rate ratios (RRs) and compared them across states categorized into two levels of domestic violence-specific firearm restrictions. Rates of NF IPH served as a crude control for characteristics of the state population that might favor violence behavior. Most “low” restriction states demonstrated greater F:NF RRs than “high” states. The average female firearm IPH rate was 0.33 per 100K for “high” restriction states and 0.98 per 100K for “low” restriction states. The average F:NF RR for low restriction states was 1.91 and for high restriction states was 0.85. The data show a trend of decreased IPH with stronger IPV-specific state firearm legislation, but with some variability in femicide rates within firearm restriction category, pointing to numerous additional factors bearing on the association, including varying implementation and enforcement of existing legal provisions, geographic location, and state household gun ownership. The present analysis confirms the dramatic contribution of firearm fatalities to female intimate partner-related deaths—frequently doubling or tripling the state's rate of non-firearm female IPH.
期刊介绍:
Violence and Gender is the only peer-reviewed journal focusing on the role of gender in the understanding, prediction, and prevention of acts of violence. The Journal is the international forum for the critical examination of biological, genetic, behavioral, psychological, racial, ethnic, and cultural factors as they relate to the gender of perpetrators of violence. Through peer-reviewed research, roundtable discussions, case studies, and other original content, Violence and Gender explores the difficult issues that are vital to threat assessment and prevention of the epidemic of violence. Violence and Gender coverage includes: Alcohol and chemical use/abuse Anthropology, social, and cultural influences Biology and physiology Brain health Brain trauma & injury Early childhood development Environmental influences Gender Genetics Group violence: gang, peer, political, government, and religious Mental health: illnesses, disorders, diseases, and conditions Neuropsychology Neuroscience Paraphilic behavior Parenting and familial influences Peer influences Personality and temperament Predatory behavior & aggression Psychopathy Psychopharmacology School, college/university, and workplace influences Sexuality Spirituality Suicidology Threat assessment warning behaviors Video games, films, television, the Internet, and media Violent fantasies Weapons.