克拉斯诺达尔地区中部大豆作物除草剂施用的农业生态评价

A. P. Savva, T. N. Telezhenko, V. A. Suvorova
{"title":"克拉斯诺达尔地区中部大豆作物除草剂施用的农业生态评价","authors":"A. P. Savva, T. N. Telezhenko, V. A. Suvorova","doi":"10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim . Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on crops of soybean variety Arleta in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory. Materials and Methods . The experiments were carried out on the experimental field of the Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection in 2022 according to the methodological recommendations for testing herbicides in agriculture. Herbicides from different chemical classes were used in the experiment. Efficiency was assessed by the difference in weed and soybean grain yield in comparison with the control. The comparative ecotoxicological load of preparations was carried out according to the ecological load and the coefficient of selectivity of action for the soil. Results . Weed species in the experiment were highly effectively suppressed by the herbicides Pulsar, BP, Pivot, VK and a mixture of Bazagran, BP + Zellek Super, and KE (88–98 %). When using Dual Gold, EC, Frontier Optima, EC and Proponit, and EC before the soybean shoots, the biological efficacy was lower. The preparations Pulsar, BP and Pivot, and VK, in comparison with other herbicides, had a lower level of environmental load and a high coefficient of selective action and meet modern safety requirements for the natural environment. Conclusions . In order to protect the environment when choosing herbicides for application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, they should be comprehensively selected taking into account the ecotoxicological load of the preparations.","PeriodicalId":41300,"journal":{"name":"South of Russia-Ecology Development","volume":"2 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, Russia\",\"authors\":\"A. P. Savva, T. N. Telezhenko, V. A. Suvorova\",\"doi\":\"10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim . Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on crops of soybean variety Arleta in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory. Materials and Methods . The experiments were carried out on the experimental field of the Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection in 2022 according to the methodological recommendations for testing herbicides in agriculture. Herbicides from different chemical classes were used in the experiment. Efficiency was assessed by the difference in weed and soybean grain yield in comparison with the control. The comparative ecotoxicological load of preparations was carried out according to the ecological load and the coefficient of selectivity of action for the soil. Results . Weed species in the experiment were highly effectively suppressed by the herbicides Pulsar, BP, Pivot, VK and a mixture of Bazagran, BP + Zellek Super, and KE (88–98 %). When using Dual Gold, EC, Frontier Optima, EC and Proponit, and EC before the soybean shoots, the biological efficacy was lower. The preparations Pulsar, BP and Pivot, and VK, in comparison with other herbicides, had a lower level of environmental load and a high coefficient of selective action and meet modern safety requirements for the natural environment. Conclusions . In order to protect the environment when choosing herbicides for application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, they should be comprehensively selected taking into account the ecotoxicological load of the preparations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South of Russia-Ecology Development\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South of Russia-Ecology Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South of Russia-Ecology Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18470/1992-1098-2023-3-170-178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。克拉斯诺达尔地区中部大豆品种Arleta除草剂施用的农业生态评价。材料与方法。实验于2022年在联邦生物植物保护研究中心的实验田根据农业除草剂测试方法建议进行。实验中使用了不同化学类别的除草剂。通过与对照相比,杂草和大豆籽粒产量的差异来评估效率。根据生态负荷和对土壤的选择性作用系数,进行了制剂的比较生态毒理学负荷。结果。Pulsar、BP、Pivot、VK除草剂和Bazagran、BP + Zellek Super、KE混合除草剂对试验杂草的抑制效果为88% ~ 98%。在大豆苗期前施用双金、EC、Frontier Optima、EC和pronit、EC的生物药效较低。与其他除草剂相比,Pulsar、BP、Pivot和VK制剂具有环境负荷水平低、选择作用系数高的特点,满足现代对自然环境的安全性要求。结论。在克拉斯诺达尔边疆区中部大豆作物选用除草剂时,应综合考虑制剂的生态毒理学负荷,以保护环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, Russia
Aim . Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on crops of soybean variety Arleta in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory. Materials and Methods . The experiments were carried out on the experimental field of the Federal Research Centre of Biological Plant Protection in 2022 according to the methodological recommendations for testing herbicides in agriculture. Herbicides from different chemical classes were used in the experiment. Efficiency was assessed by the difference in weed and soybean grain yield in comparison with the control. The comparative ecotoxicological load of preparations was carried out according to the ecological load and the coefficient of selectivity of action for the soil. Results . Weed species in the experiment were highly effectively suppressed by the herbicides Pulsar, BP, Pivot, VK and a mixture of Bazagran, BP + Zellek Super, and KE (88–98 %). When using Dual Gold, EC, Frontier Optima, EC and Proponit, and EC before the soybean shoots, the biological efficacy was lower. The preparations Pulsar, BP and Pivot, and VK, in comparison with other herbicides, had a lower level of environmental load and a high coefficient of selective action and meet modern safety requirements for the natural environment. Conclusions . In order to protect the environment when choosing herbicides for application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, they should be comprehensively selected taking into account the ecotoxicological load of the preparations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
An elaboration of obstacles and perspectives of medical tourism development taking the approach of integrated service provision (Case study: Isfahan Province, Iran) Agroecological assessment of herbicides application on soybean crops in the central zone of Krasnodar Territory, Russia Microplaston artificial polymers in the Miass River and Lake Turgoyak (Southern Urals, Russia) in the early stages of colonisation Monitoring greenhouse gas emissions at the WAY CARBON carbonic polygon through regenerative animal husbandry A method for obtaining aqueous and dry ethanol extracts of grass (a mixture of flowers with leaves) and a stalk of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) with inhibitory activity on the replication of the SARS‐CoV‐2 coronavirus in vitro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1