效益实现:公共重大项目交付的案例研究及实践建议

IF 6.1 3区 管理学 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Production Planning & Control Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287
Terry Williams, Hang Vo, Mike Bourne, Pippa Bourne, Richard Kirkham, Gordon Masterton, Paolo Quattrone, Carolina Toczycka
{"title":"效益实现:公共重大项目交付的案例研究及实践建议","authors":"Terry Williams, Hang Vo, Mike Bourne, Pippa Bourne, Richard Kirkham, Gordon Masterton, Paolo Quattrone, Carolina Toczycka","doi":"10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public projects are enablers of policy and are often framed within a political context characterized by the unpredictable, emergent, ambiguous and contextual; this creates tensions around conceptualizations of project performance and project success. Public projects are generally authorized based on a favourable benefit-to-cost ratio, so ex-post scrutiny of realized benefits is crucial to effective evaluation. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that sometimes, the focus on project delivery may come at the expense of benefits realization. This paper describes part of a wider programme of research into benefits realization in public projects. We present ‘deep dives’ into 3 UK projects and draw on a formal theoretical base to consider questions such as ‘what is a benefit?’, ‘how good are we at defining benefits/beneficiaries?’, ’how can we manage and capture evolving benefits in complex environments?’; ‘how do we recognize and accept complexity while the environment changes?’ and ‘what effects does this have on our understanding of benefits realization?’. This paper presents an analysis of the case studies and provides a synthesis of the main findings. We make eight recommendations for professional practice in the field of benefits management and set out some conclusions relevant to the wider discourse on the evaluation of investment in public projects.","PeriodicalId":20627,"journal":{"name":"Production Planning & Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits realisation: case studies in public major project delivery with recommendations for practice\",\"authors\":\"Terry Williams, Hang Vo, Mike Bourne, Pippa Bourne, Richard Kirkham, Gordon Masterton, Paolo Quattrone, Carolina Toczycka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public projects are enablers of policy and are often framed within a political context characterized by the unpredictable, emergent, ambiguous and contextual; this creates tensions around conceptualizations of project performance and project success. Public projects are generally authorized based on a favourable benefit-to-cost ratio, so ex-post scrutiny of realized benefits is crucial to effective evaluation. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that sometimes, the focus on project delivery may come at the expense of benefits realization. This paper describes part of a wider programme of research into benefits realization in public projects. We present ‘deep dives’ into 3 UK projects and draw on a formal theoretical base to consider questions such as ‘what is a benefit?’, ‘how good are we at defining benefits/beneficiaries?’, ’how can we manage and capture evolving benefits in complex environments?’; ‘how do we recognize and accept complexity while the environment changes?’ and ‘what effects does this have on our understanding of benefits realization?’. This paper presents an analysis of the case studies and provides a synthesis of the main findings. We make eight recommendations for professional practice in the field of benefits management and set out some conclusions relevant to the wider discourse on the evaluation of investment in public projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production Planning & Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production Planning & Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Planning & Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2023.2256287","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共项目是政策的推动者,通常是在不可预测、紧急、模糊和背景的政治背景下制定的;这在项目绩效和项目成功的概念化方面造成了紧张。公共项目通常是根据有利的效益成本比批准的,因此对实现效益的事后审查对有效评价至关重要。然而,有证据表明,有时,对项目交付的关注可能会以牺牲利益实现为代价。本文描述了公共项目效益实现研究的一部分。我们将对3个英国项目进行“深入研究”,并利用正式的理论基础来思考诸如“好处是什么?”,“我们在确定福利/受益人方面做得有多好?”,“我们如何在复杂的环境中管理和获取不断变化的利益?”“随着环境的变化,我们如何认识和接受复杂性?”以及“这对我们理解利益实现有什么影响?”本文对案例研究进行了分析,并对主要研究结果进行了综合。我们为利益管理领域的专业实践提出了八项建议,并提出了一些与公共项目投资评估相关的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits realisation: case studies in public major project delivery with recommendations for practice
Public projects are enablers of policy and are often framed within a political context characterized by the unpredictable, emergent, ambiguous and contextual; this creates tensions around conceptualizations of project performance and project success. Public projects are generally authorized based on a favourable benefit-to-cost ratio, so ex-post scrutiny of realized benefits is crucial to effective evaluation. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that sometimes, the focus on project delivery may come at the expense of benefits realization. This paper describes part of a wider programme of research into benefits realization in public projects. We present ‘deep dives’ into 3 UK projects and draw on a formal theoretical base to consider questions such as ‘what is a benefit?’, ‘how good are we at defining benefits/beneficiaries?’, ’how can we manage and capture evolving benefits in complex environments?’; ‘how do we recognize and accept complexity while the environment changes?’ and ‘what effects does this have on our understanding of benefits realization?’. This paper presents an analysis of the case studies and provides a synthesis of the main findings. We make eight recommendations for professional practice in the field of benefits management and set out some conclusions relevant to the wider discourse on the evaluation of investment in public projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production Planning & Control
Production Planning & Control 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
9.60%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Production Planning & Control is an international journal that focuses on research papers concerning operations management across industries. It emphasizes research originating from industrial needs that can provide guidance to managers and future researchers. Papers accepted by "Production Planning & Control" should address emerging industrial needs, clearly outlining the nature of the industrial problem. Any suitable research methods may be employed, and each paper should justify the method used. Case studies illustrating international significance are encouraged. Authors are encouraged to relate their work to existing knowledge in the field, particularly regarding its implications for management practice and future research agendas.
期刊最新文献
‘The rules of the game’: How business research journals discourage knowledge translation to practice and what needs to change Exploring pillars of supply chain competitiveness: insights from leading global supply chains Integrating circular economy and Industry 4.0 for sustainable supply chain management: a dynamic capability view A framework for the systematic implementation of Green-Lean and sustainability in SMEs Exploring the barriers in medical additive manufacturing from an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1