{"title":"通过创新方法和数据改进管理理论和决策","authors":"George C. Banks, Herman Aguinis","doi":"10.5465/amp.2022.0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods and data innovations have served as catalysts for theory advancement and policy-making throughout the evolution of management and many other fields. However, new methods take a long time to be diffused and adopted. The most common contemporary methods used in management research are similar to those used decades ago. Drawing upon theories of knowledge diffusion and adoption, we identify four barriers to the slow propagation of methodological innovations: (a) insufficient knowledge or skills, (b) inadequate adoption of technology, (c) outdated norms, and (d) inefficient incentives as well as inapplicable journal and professional organization policies. Then, to show the usefulness of the four-barrier framework for understanding slow diffusion and adoption, we focus on three selective methods and data innovations: Collection of Web-based (aka big) data, utilization of video-based methods, and use of computer-aided text analysis techniques. Our aim is not to create a “ gold rush ” for new methods or accelerate methodological and theoretical speed for their own sake, but to expand our collective methodological toolkit to develop and test more robust, replicable, accurate, predictive, and credible theory that will result in better-informed and more effective policy-making.","PeriodicalId":48215,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Perspectives","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Management Theory and Policy-Making Through Innovative Methods and Data\",\"authors\":\"George C. Banks, Herman Aguinis\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amp.2022.0099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methods and data innovations have served as catalysts for theory advancement and policy-making throughout the evolution of management and many other fields. However, new methods take a long time to be diffused and adopted. The most common contemporary methods used in management research are similar to those used decades ago. Drawing upon theories of knowledge diffusion and adoption, we identify four barriers to the slow propagation of methodological innovations: (a) insufficient knowledge or skills, (b) inadequate adoption of technology, (c) outdated norms, and (d) inefficient incentives as well as inapplicable journal and professional organization policies. Then, to show the usefulness of the four-barrier framework for understanding slow diffusion and adoption, we focus on three selective methods and data innovations: Collection of Web-based (aka big) data, utilization of video-based methods, and use of computer-aided text analysis techniques. Our aim is not to create a “ gold rush ” for new methods or accelerate methodological and theoretical speed for their own sake, but to expand our collective methodological toolkit to develop and test more robust, replicable, accurate, predictive, and credible theory that will result in better-informed and more effective policy-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2022.0099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving Management Theory and Policy-Making Through Innovative Methods and Data
Methods and data innovations have served as catalysts for theory advancement and policy-making throughout the evolution of management and many other fields. However, new methods take a long time to be diffused and adopted. The most common contemporary methods used in management research are similar to those used decades ago. Drawing upon theories of knowledge diffusion and adoption, we identify four barriers to the slow propagation of methodological innovations: (a) insufficient knowledge or skills, (b) inadequate adoption of technology, (c) outdated norms, and (d) inefficient incentives as well as inapplicable journal and professional organization policies. Then, to show the usefulness of the four-barrier framework for understanding slow diffusion and adoption, we focus on three selective methods and data innovations: Collection of Web-based (aka big) data, utilization of video-based methods, and use of computer-aided text analysis techniques. Our aim is not to create a “ gold rush ” for new methods or accelerate methodological and theoretical speed for their own sake, but to expand our collective methodological toolkit to develop and test more robust, replicable, accurate, predictive, and credible theory that will result in better-informed and more effective policy-making.
期刊介绍:
Academy of Management Perspectives (AMP) aims to provide valuable insights to current and future thought leaders, including educators, business writers, consultants, executives, policy makers, and other professionals involved in management practice and policy. The publication seeks to bridge the gap between scholarly research and practical applications by presenting evidence-based approaches to address crucial management issues.
AMP publishes research papers that employ quantitative or qualitative evidence, either from a single study or a compilation of studies within a specific field of research. The journal does not accept opinion pieces but encourages articles that focus on the implications of findings for policy and practice rather than theoretical implications.
Examples of suitable articles for publication in AMP include practitioner or policy-oriented reviews of empirical studies, descriptive articles that contribute to our comprehension of management practices and strategic approaches, and articles highlighting the practical and policy implications of evidence-based work.