双职工家庭夫妻上下班时间及上下班方式分析

Bobae Moon, Yunsuk Lee
{"title":"双职工家庭夫妻上下班时间及上下班方式分析","authors":"Bobae Moon, Yunsuk Lee","doi":"10.35175/krs.2023.24.2.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we compare the commuting times and means of wives and husbands in dual-earner couples using the data from the Korean Time Use Survey in 2019. Frist, we find that commuting time is shorter for wives than for husbands, and more pronounced differences were revealed in couples with children. Second, the proportions of using the car is higher for husbands, suggesting that husbands have better mobility resources than wives. Third, regression results indicate that wives with their own or spouses’ income levels higher, or with preschool child and long working hours, have less commuting time. Our findings propose that the household responsibility hypothesis is still valid. This study suggests that it is necessary to consider the vehicle system for couples along with the establishment of a dense public transportation network. In order to guarantee high-quality employment opportunities for married women, households and childcare policies for dual-earner couples must precede above all else.","PeriodicalId":488706,"journal":{"name":"Jiyeog sahoehag","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Commuting Times and Methods for Wives and Husbands in Dual-earner Couples\",\"authors\":\"Bobae Moon, Yunsuk Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.35175/krs.2023.24.2.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we compare the commuting times and means of wives and husbands in dual-earner couples using the data from the Korean Time Use Survey in 2019. Frist, we find that commuting time is shorter for wives than for husbands, and more pronounced differences were revealed in couples with children. Second, the proportions of using the car is higher for husbands, suggesting that husbands have better mobility resources than wives. Third, regression results indicate that wives with their own or spouses’ income levels higher, or with preschool child and long working hours, have less commuting time. Our findings propose that the household responsibility hypothesis is still valid. This study suggests that it is necessary to consider the vehicle system for couples along with the establishment of a dense public transportation network. In order to guarantee high-quality employment opportunities for married women, households and childcare policies for dual-earner couples must precede above all else.\",\"PeriodicalId\":488706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jiyeog sahoehag\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jiyeog sahoehag\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35175/krs.2023.24.2.133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jiyeog sahoehag","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35175/krs.2023.24.2.133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们使用2019年韩国时间使用调查的数据,比较了双职工夫妇的通勤时间和妻子和丈夫的手段。首先,我们发现妻子的通勤时间比丈夫短,有孩子的夫妇之间的差异更明显。其次,丈夫使用汽车的比例更高,说明丈夫比妻子拥有更好的出行资源。第三,回归结果表明,自身或配偶收入水平较高、子女学龄前且工作时间较长的妻子通勤时间较少。我们的研究结果表明,家庭责任假说仍然有效。本研究建议在建立密集的公共交通网络的同时,也要考虑情侣出行的车辆系统。为了保证已婚妇女的高质量就业机会,双职工夫妇的家庭和育儿政策必须优先于一切。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Commuting Times and Methods for Wives and Husbands in Dual-earner Couples
In this study, we compare the commuting times and means of wives and husbands in dual-earner couples using the data from the Korean Time Use Survey in 2019. Frist, we find that commuting time is shorter for wives than for husbands, and more pronounced differences were revealed in couples with children. Second, the proportions of using the car is higher for husbands, suggesting that husbands have better mobility resources than wives. Third, regression results indicate that wives with their own or spouses’ income levels higher, or with preschool child and long working hours, have less commuting time. Our findings propose that the household responsibility hypothesis is still valid. This study suggests that it is necessary to consider the vehicle system for couples along with the establishment of a dense public transportation network. In order to guarantee high-quality employment opportunities for married women, households and childcare policies for dual-earner couples must precede above all else.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Commuting Times and Methods for Wives and Husbands in Dual-earner Couples Local community solidarity activities through the fishery industry and the global seafood distribution network: focused on Guryongpo The representation of space on tradition and social change: Based on ‘Minsokchon’, ‘minsokmaul’ and ‘hanokmaul’ Factors of Secondary Outflow of College Graduates from the Southeastern to the Metropolitan Area: Focusing on Job Values A Study on Facilitating Strategy for the Templestay Program at Guryongsa Temple in Mt. Chiak, Wonju, Gangwon-do: Focusing on Walking Meditation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1