新冠疫情期间虚假信息传播与科学传播的社会网络分析

Jieli Liu, Ravi Maithrey Regulagedda
{"title":"新冠疫情期间虚假信息传播与科学传播的社会网络分析","authors":"Jieli Liu, Ravi Maithrey Regulagedda","doi":"10.1002/pra2.944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The outbreak of COVID‐19 has resulted in an increase in health misinformation spreading on social media, emphasizing the need for effective science communication to combat this issue. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between misinformation spreading and science communication network. We identified misinformation spreaders, scientists, and laypeople from COVID vaccine‐related tweets, and we carried out a network analysis to examine the ingroup and intergroup interactions. We found that individuals in all three groups tended to interact with people who were dissimilar to them. Additionally, we found that the spreading of misinformation and the science communication network are polarized. Finally, suggestions were provided to achieve higher engagement in science communication.","PeriodicalId":37833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Network Analysis of Misinformation Spreading and Science Communication during <scp>COVID</scp>‐19\",\"authors\":\"Jieli Liu, Ravi Maithrey Regulagedda\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pra2.944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The outbreak of COVID‐19 has resulted in an increase in health misinformation spreading on social media, emphasizing the need for effective science communication to combat this issue. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between misinformation spreading and science communication network. We identified misinformation spreaders, scientists, and laypeople from COVID vaccine‐related tweets, and we carried out a network analysis to examine the ingroup and intergroup interactions. We found that individuals in all three groups tended to interact with people who were dissimilar to them. Additionally, we found that the spreading of misinformation and the science communication network are polarized. Finally, suggestions were provided to achieve higher engagement in science communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID - 19的爆发导致社交媒体上健康错误信息的传播增加,强调需要有效的科学传播来解决这一问题。本研究旨在分析错误信息传播与科学传播网络的关系。我们从与COVID疫苗相关的推文中确定了错误信息传播者、科学家和外行人,并进行了网络分析,以检查组内和组间的相互作用。我们发现,这三组人都倾向于与与自己不同的人互动。此外,我们发现错误信息的传播和科学传播网络是两极化的。最后,提出了提高科学传播参与度的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Network Analysis of Misinformation Spreading and Science Communication during COVID‐19
ABSTRACT The outbreak of COVID‐19 has resulted in an increase in health misinformation spreading on social media, emphasizing the need for effective science communication to combat this issue. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between misinformation spreading and science communication network. We identified misinformation spreaders, scientists, and laypeople from COVID vaccine‐related tweets, and we carried out a network analysis to examine the ingroup and intergroup interactions. We found that individuals in all three groups tended to interact with people who were dissimilar to them. Additionally, we found that the spreading of misinformation and the science communication network are polarized. Finally, suggestions were provided to achieve higher engagement in science communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Considering the Role of Information and Context in Promoting Health-Related Behavioral Change. Transforming Indigenous Knowledges Stewardship Praxis through an Ethics of Care “I Am in a Privileged Situation”: Examining the Factors Promoting Inequity in Open Access Publishing Shifting Roles of Citizen Scientists Accelerates High‐Quality Data Collection for Climate Change Research Investigating the Intersections of Ethics and Artificial Intelligence in the Collections as Data Position Papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1