成都与广州中国留学归国人员的比较:归国原因、目的地选择与继续迁移意愿

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1080/1369183x.2023.2270342
Yixi Lu, Jason Jean, Ling Ma
{"title":"成都与广州中国留学归国人员的比较:归国原因、目的地选择与继续迁移意愿","authors":"Yixi Lu, Jason Jean, Ling Ma","doi":"10.1080/1369183x.2023.2270342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis is a comparative study on Chinese academic returnees in Chengdu and Guangzhou, China. Adopting the concepts of intellectual gateway (IG), intellectual node (IN) and intellectual capital (IC) from the intellectual migration (IM) framework, as well as the amenities perspective in migration studies, this article conceptualises Chengdu as an emerging IG and Guangzhou as a typical IG. Through analysing macro-level public data and first-hand interviews and survey data at the micro level, it explores academic returnees’destination choice and if urban amenities and individual preferences influence their onward migration intention. It concludes that academic returnees’choice of destination is not only highly related to their pursuit of IC development and economic capital, but is also influenced by their preferences of different types of cultural amenities. Chengdu’s cultural amenities tend to attract and retain more personal-life-oriented academic returnees, while Guangzhou is favoured by professional-life-oriented returnees. Furthermore, compared to returnees in Guangzhou, those in Chengdu are more likely to stay for longer terms. It is suggested that building rich cultural amenities and intellectual networks can be potential advantages for emerging IGs in attracting and retaining intellectual migrants.KEYWORDS: Academic returneesdestinationreturn migrationonward migrationamenity AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to extend their sincere appreciation to the editors and reviewers, for their careful reading as well as detailed and insightful comments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971183; 42371229;41971184).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 YTTP is a sub-program of TTP launched in 2011 to attract overseas top-tier scientists under the age of 40.2 Sichuan area refers to the geographic area of Sichuan, thus it includes Chongqing.","PeriodicalId":48371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","volume":"55 15","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Chinese academic returnees in Chengdu and Guangzhou: reasons for return, choice of destination and onward migration intention\",\"authors\":\"Yixi Lu, Jason Jean, Ling Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1369183x.2023.2270342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis is a comparative study on Chinese academic returnees in Chengdu and Guangzhou, China. Adopting the concepts of intellectual gateway (IG), intellectual node (IN) and intellectual capital (IC) from the intellectual migration (IM) framework, as well as the amenities perspective in migration studies, this article conceptualises Chengdu as an emerging IG and Guangzhou as a typical IG. Through analysing macro-level public data and first-hand interviews and survey data at the micro level, it explores academic returnees’destination choice and if urban amenities and individual preferences influence their onward migration intention. It concludes that academic returnees’choice of destination is not only highly related to their pursuit of IC development and economic capital, but is also influenced by their preferences of different types of cultural amenities. Chengdu’s cultural amenities tend to attract and retain more personal-life-oriented academic returnees, while Guangzhou is favoured by professional-life-oriented returnees. Furthermore, compared to returnees in Guangzhou, those in Chengdu are more likely to stay for longer terms. It is suggested that building rich cultural amenities and intellectual networks can be potential advantages for emerging IGs in attracting and retaining intellectual migrants.KEYWORDS: Academic returneesdestinationreturn migrationonward migrationamenity AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to extend their sincere appreciation to the editors and reviewers, for their careful reading as well as detailed and insightful comments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971183; 42371229;41971184).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 YTTP is a sub-program of TTP launched in 2011 to attract overseas top-tier scientists under the age of 40.2 Sichuan area refers to the geographic area of Sichuan, thus it includes Chongqing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\",\"volume\":\"55 15\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2023.2270342\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2023.2270342","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文对成都和广州的归国留学人员进行了比较研究。本文采用智力迁移(IM)框架中的智力门户(IG)、智力节点(IN)和智力资本(IC)概念,以及移民研究中的便利设施视角,将成都定义为新兴的智力迁移,将广州定义为典型的智力迁移。通过分析宏观层面的公共数据和微观层面的第一手访谈和调查数据,探讨留学归国人员的目的地选择,以及城市便利设施和个人偏好是否影响他们的移民意愿。研究发现,留学归国人员的留学目的地选择不仅与他们对IC发展和经济资本的追求高度相关,而且还受到他们对不同类型文化设施偏好的影响。成都的文化设施倾向于吸引和留住更多以个人生活为导向的学术海归,而广州则受到以职业生活为导向的海归的青睐。此外,与广州海归相比,成都海归更有可能停留更长时间。建立丰富的文化设施和知识分子网络可能是新兴发达国家吸引和留住知识分子移民的潜在优势。作者谨向编辑和审稿人致以诚挚的谢意,感谢他们的细心阅读和详细而有见地的评论。国家自然科学基金项目(41971183;42371229; 42371229)。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1 YTTP是2011年启动的TTP的子项目,旨在吸引海外40.2岁以下的顶尖科学家。四川地区指的是四川的地理区域,因此包括重庆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Chinese academic returnees in Chengdu and Guangzhou: reasons for return, choice of destination and onward migration intention
ABSTRACTThis is a comparative study on Chinese academic returnees in Chengdu and Guangzhou, China. Adopting the concepts of intellectual gateway (IG), intellectual node (IN) and intellectual capital (IC) from the intellectual migration (IM) framework, as well as the amenities perspective in migration studies, this article conceptualises Chengdu as an emerging IG and Guangzhou as a typical IG. Through analysing macro-level public data and first-hand interviews and survey data at the micro level, it explores academic returnees’destination choice and if urban amenities and individual preferences influence their onward migration intention. It concludes that academic returnees’choice of destination is not only highly related to their pursuit of IC development and economic capital, but is also influenced by their preferences of different types of cultural amenities. Chengdu’s cultural amenities tend to attract and retain more personal-life-oriented academic returnees, while Guangzhou is favoured by professional-life-oriented returnees. Furthermore, compared to returnees in Guangzhou, those in Chengdu are more likely to stay for longer terms. It is suggested that building rich cultural amenities and intellectual networks can be potential advantages for emerging IGs in attracting and retaining intellectual migrants.KEYWORDS: Academic returneesdestinationreturn migrationonward migrationamenity AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to extend their sincere appreciation to the editors and reviewers, for their careful reading as well as detailed and insightful comments. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971183; 42371229;41971184).Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 YTTP is a sub-program of TTP launched in 2011 to attract overseas top-tier scientists under the age of 40.2 Sichuan area refers to the geographic area of Sichuan, thus it includes Chongqing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (JEMS) publishes the results of first-class research on all forms of migration and its consequences, together with articles on ethnic conflict, discrimination, racism, nationalism, citizenship and policies of integration. Contributions to the journal, which are all fully refereed, are especially welcome when they are the result of original empirical research that makes a clear contribution to the field of migration JEMS has a long-standing interest in informed policy debate and contributions are welcomed which seek to develop the implications of research for policy innovation, or which evaluate the results of previous initiatives. The journal is also interested in publishing the results of theoretical work.
期刊最新文献
Noninvasive Biomarkers for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease-A Proteomic Related Preliminary Report. Experimental evidence on how implicit racial bias affects risk preferences Becoming white or becoming mainstream?: defining the endpoint of assimilation Mental wellbeing and ethnic brokerage in friendship networks of adolescents in German secondary schools ‘Not having a real life’: psychosocial functions of using and selling drugs among young Afghan men who came to Sweden as unaccompanied minors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1