在美国和韩国的工作成年人中,工作需求满意度的相对重要性:一项跨文化研究

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Career Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1177/10690727231205300
Ji-Hye Kim, Haram J. Kim, Ryan D. Duffy, Ki-Hak Lee
{"title":"在美国和韩国的工作成年人中,工作需求满意度的相对重要性:一项跨文化研究","authors":"Ji-Hye Kim, Haram J. Kim, Ryan D. Duffy, Ki-Hak Lee","doi":"10.1177/10690727231205300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the Psychology of Working Theory (PWT), work need satisfaction is a key predictor of positive outcomes, such as well-being and work fulfillment. However, important cultural differences may exist regarding the relative importance of different types of needs in predicting well-being and work fulfillment. To address this idea, we collected data from workers in the U.S. and Korea and conducted a relative weight analysis with employed adults, comparing how well specific needs predicted the four proposed PWT outcomes. For American workers ( n = 281), the five need constructs were more predictive of work and well-being outcomes than for Korean workers ( n = 327). The most notable differences were prediction of work meaning and physical health, with social contribution and relatedness need satisfaction being much more predictive of these outcomes in the U.S. than Korean sample, respectively. Overall, the findings suggest that work need satisfaction may promote workers’ well-being in both countries; however, these relationships may differ somewhat depending on the culture. Practical implications and future research directions based on these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47978,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Career Assessment","volume":"18 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative Importance of Work Need Satisfaction Among Working Adults in the United States and South Korea: A Cross-Cultural Study\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Hye Kim, Haram J. Kim, Ryan D. Duffy, Ki-Hak Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10690727231205300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"According to the Psychology of Working Theory (PWT), work need satisfaction is a key predictor of positive outcomes, such as well-being and work fulfillment. However, important cultural differences may exist regarding the relative importance of different types of needs in predicting well-being and work fulfillment. To address this idea, we collected data from workers in the U.S. and Korea and conducted a relative weight analysis with employed adults, comparing how well specific needs predicted the four proposed PWT outcomes. For American workers ( n = 281), the five need constructs were more predictive of work and well-being outcomes than for Korean workers ( n = 327). The most notable differences were prediction of work meaning and physical health, with social contribution and relatedness need satisfaction being much more predictive of these outcomes in the U.S. than Korean sample, respectively. Overall, the findings suggest that work need satisfaction may promote workers’ well-being in both countries; however, these relationships may differ somewhat depending on the culture. Practical implications and future research directions based on these findings are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Career Assessment\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Career Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231205300\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Career Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727231205300","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据工作心理学理论(PWT),工作需求满意度是积极结果的关键预测因素,比如幸福感和工作成就感。然而,对于不同类型的需求在预测幸福感和工作成就感方面的相对重要性,可能存在重要的文化差异。为了阐明这一观点,我们从美国和韩国的工人那里收集了数据,并对有工作的成年人进行了相对权重分析,比较了特定需求对四种建议的PWT结果的预测效果。对于美国工人(n = 281),这五种需求结构比韩国工人(n = 327)更能预测工作和幸福结果。最显著的差异是对工作意义和身体健康的预测,美国的社会贡献和相关性需求满意度比韩国的更能预测这些结果。总体而言,研究结果表明,工作需求满意度可能会促进两国工人的幸福感;然而,这些关系可能会因文化的不同而有所不同。在此基础上,对未来的研究方向和现实意义进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relative Importance of Work Need Satisfaction Among Working Adults in the United States and South Korea: A Cross-Cultural Study
According to the Psychology of Working Theory (PWT), work need satisfaction is a key predictor of positive outcomes, such as well-being and work fulfillment. However, important cultural differences may exist regarding the relative importance of different types of needs in predicting well-being and work fulfillment. To address this idea, we collected data from workers in the U.S. and Korea and conducted a relative weight analysis with employed adults, comparing how well specific needs predicted the four proposed PWT outcomes. For American workers ( n = 281), the five need constructs were more predictive of work and well-being outcomes than for Korean workers ( n = 327). The most notable differences were prediction of work meaning and physical health, with social contribution and relatedness need satisfaction being much more predictive of these outcomes in the U.S. than Korean sample, respectively. Overall, the findings suggest that work need satisfaction may promote workers’ well-being in both countries; however, these relationships may differ somewhat depending on the culture. Practical implications and future research directions based on these findings are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Career Assessment
Journal of Career Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
15.60%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Career Assessment publishes methodologically sound, empirically based studies focusing on the process and techniques by which counselors and others gain understanding of the individual faced with the necessity of making informed career decisions. The term career assessment, as used in this journal, covers the various techniques, tests, inventories, rating scales, interview schedules, surveys, and direct observational methods used in scientifically based practice and research to provide an improved understanding of career decision-making. The focus is not just testing, but all those means developed and used to assess and evaluate individuals and environments in the field of career counseling and development.
期刊最新文献
Motivational Career Resources and Subjective Career Success: A Test of Mediation and Moderation From Adaptive Readiness to Adaptation Results Testing the Career Construction Model of Adaptation in Chinese Adolescents Youth Perspectives on Decent Education and College and Career Readiness Psychosocial Readiness for College: A Multidimensional Model and Measure for Students Entering College in Their Twenties Disentangling Underemployment and Precarious Work: A Latent Profile Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1