你所在地区的多样性对你学习一门额外的语言有帮助吗?

IF 1.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1075/lab.22057.per
Sílvia Perpiñán, Silvina Montrul
{"title":"你所在地区的多样性对你学习一门额外的语言有帮助吗?","authors":"Sílvia Perpiñán, Silvina Montrul","doi":"10.1075/lab.22057.per","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Italian speakers from two dialectal areas–North and\n South Italy–learning Spanish. Southern Italo-Romance varieties exhibit a DOM system through a-marking, like\n Spanish, whereas the Northern varieties, like Standard Italian, only allow DOM with pronouns. Given the structural differences and\n similarities among these typologically close languages, we ask whether a stigmatized oral regional variety has the potential to\n transfer in the acquisition of additional languages. Participants (n = 103) completed an acceptability judgment\n task (AJT) and an oral production task testing DOM in [±animate, ±definite] DP contexts. The results revealed differences\n modulated by proficiency in the written AJT that moderately favored the Northern learners and in the oral production task that\n favored the Southern learners. These findings suggest that low-prestige varieties may not have the full potential to transfer at\n early stages of acquisition due to their inhibition in formal contexts, but that they can emerge in less formal tasks. We argue\n that current theoretical models that prioritize linguistic proximity as the primary source of transfer at initial stages of L3 acquisition are\n unable to capture revealing patterns from understudied sociolinguistic contexts that bring new light to the study of\n multilingualism.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does your regional variety help you acquire an additional language?\",\"authors\":\"Sílvia Perpiñán, Silvina Montrul\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.22057.per\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Italian speakers from two dialectal areas–North and\\n South Italy–learning Spanish. Southern Italo-Romance varieties exhibit a DOM system through a-marking, like\\n Spanish, whereas the Northern varieties, like Standard Italian, only allow DOM with pronouns. Given the structural differences and\\n similarities among these typologically close languages, we ask whether a stigmatized oral regional variety has the potential to\\n transfer in the acquisition of additional languages. Participants (n = 103) completed an acceptability judgment\\n task (AJT) and an oral production task testing DOM in [±animate, ±definite] DP contexts. The results revealed differences\\n modulated by proficiency in the written AJT that moderately favored the Northern learners and in the oral production task that\\n favored the Southern learners. These findings suggest that low-prestige varieties may not have the full potential to transfer at\\n early stages of acquisition due to their inhibition in formal contexts, but that they can emerge in less formal tasks. We argue\\n that current theoretical models that prioritize linguistic proximity as the primary source of transfer at initial stages of L3 acquisition are\\n unable to capture revealing patterns from understudied sociolinguistic contexts that bring new light to the study of\\n multilingualism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22057.per\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.22057.per","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究调查了意大利南北两个方言区意大利语使用者学习西班牙语时的差异对象标记(DOM)。南部的italo -罗曼语变体像西班牙语一样通过-标记展示DOM系统,而北部的italo -罗曼语变体像标准意大利语一样,只允许带有代词的DOM。考虑到这些类型学上相近的语言在结构上的差异和相似之处,我们想知道一个被污名化的口头区域变体是否有可能在其他语言的习得中转移。参与者(n = 103)完成了可接受性判断任务(AJT)和在[±动画,±确定]DP情境下测试DOM的口头生产任务。结果显示,北方学习者在书面AJT上的熟练程度适中,而南方学习者在口头生产任务上的熟练程度较高。这些发现表明,由于在正式环境中受到抑制,低声望的变体在习得的早期阶段可能没有充分的转移潜力,但它们可以在较不正式的任务中出现。我们认为,当前的理论模型优先考虑语言接近性作为三语习得初始阶段迁移的主要来源,无法从研究不足的社会语言学背景中捕捉揭示模式,这些模式为多语研究带来了新的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does your regional variety help you acquire an additional language?
This study investigates Differential Object Marking (DOM) in Italian speakers from two dialectal areas–North and South Italy–learning Spanish. Southern Italo-Romance varieties exhibit a DOM system through a-marking, like Spanish, whereas the Northern varieties, like Standard Italian, only allow DOM with pronouns. Given the structural differences and similarities among these typologically close languages, we ask whether a stigmatized oral regional variety has the potential to transfer in the acquisition of additional languages. Participants (n = 103) completed an acceptability judgment task (AJT) and an oral production task testing DOM in [±animate, ±definite] DP contexts. The results revealed differences modulated by proficiency in the written AJT that moderately favored the Northern learners and in the oral production task that favored the Southern learners. These findings suggest that low-prestige varieties may not have the full potential to transfer at early stages of acquisition due to their inhibition in formal contexts, but that they can emerge in less formal tasks. We argue that current theoretical models that prioritize linguistic proximity as the primary source of transfer at initial stages of L3 acquisition are unable to capture revealing patterns from understudied sociolinguistic contexts that bring new light to the study of multilingualism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.
期刊最新文献
Heritage speaker pragmatics Prediction during spoken language processing in monolingual and multilingual children The acquisition of consonant clusters and word stress by early second language learners of German Reviewers for Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism in 2022 and 2023 Inter-generational attrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1