《纽约时报》和《中国日报》新冠肺炎新闻报道的批判性话语分析

Q3 Arts and Humanities Manusya Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1163/26659077-26010004
Yulin Mai, Andrew Jocuns
{"title":"《纽约时报》和《中国日报》新冠肺炎新闻报道的批判性话语分析","authors":"Yulin Mai, Andrew Jocuns","doi":"10.1163/26659077-26010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A multimodal critical discourse analysis of The New York Times and China Daily ’s news reports of Covid-19 was conducted to identify the ideologies in Covid-19 news reports. The Covid-19 pandemic was divided into three phases: China’s anti-pandemic phase, first global outbreak, and second global outbreak. The nyt and cd ’s Covid-19 news reports not only conveyed facts but also served different ideologies which shifted over each phase. Both the nyt and cd news media employed lexical devices, images, and metaphors to convey different ideologies, shaping people’s perceptions of the pandemic and government measures to control it. The nyt ’s Covid-19 reporting implied that China’s pandemic measures were irrational and extreme, and that the Trump administration’s policies during the outbreak were ineffective, while feminism and racism also appeared. cd ’s news reports of the pandemic portrayed efficiency by the Chinese government’s in controlling Covid-19 and a positive attitude toward government officials.","PeriodicalId":36735,"journal":{"name":"Manusya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on Covid-19 from The New York Times and China Daily\",\"authors\":\"Yulin Mai, Andrew Jocuns\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/26659077-26010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A multimodal critical discourse analysis of The New York Times and China Daily ’s news reports of Covid-19 was conducted to identify the ideologies in Covid-19 news reports. The Covid-19 pandemic was divided into three phases: China’s anti-pandemic phase, first global outbreak, and second global outbreak. The nyt and cd ’s Covid-19 news reports not only conveyed facts but also served different ideologies which shifted over each phase. Both the nyt and cd news media employed lexical devices, images, and metaphors to convey different ideologies, shaping people’s perceptions of the pandemic and government measures to control it. The nyt ’s Covid-19 reporting implied that China’s pandemic measures were irrational and extreme, and that the Trump administration’s policies during the outbreak were ineffective, while feminism and racism also appeared. cd ’s news reports of the pandemic portrayed efficiency by the Chinese government’s in controlling Covid-19 and a positive attitude toward government officials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36735,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manusya\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manusya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-26010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manusya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/26659077-26010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对《纽约时报》和《中国日报》新冠肺炎新闻报道的多模态批评话语分析,找出新冠肺炎新闻报道中的意识形态。新冠肺炎大流行分为三个阶段:中国抗疫阶段、第一次全球疫情阶段和第二次全球疫情阶段。《纽约时报》和《cd》的新冠肺炎报道不仅传达了事实,而且在每个阶段都有不同的意识形态。《纽约时报》和《cd》新闻媒体都使用了词汇、图像和隐喻来传达不同的意识形态,塑造了人们对疫情和政府控制措施的看法。《纽约时报》的新冠肺炎报道暗示了中国的防疫措施是非理性和极端的,特朗普政府在疫情期间的政策是无效的,同时也出现了女权主义和种族主义。中国媒体对新冠肺炎疫情的报道,体现了中国政府防控工作的效率和对政府官员的积极态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on Covid-19 from The New York Times and China Daily
Abstract A multimodal critical discourse analysis of The New York Times and China Daily ’s news reports of Covid-19 was conducted to identify the ideologies in Covid-19 news reports. The Covid-19 pandemic was divided into three phases: China’s anti-pandemic phase, first global outbreak, and second global outbreak. The nyt and cd ’s Covid-19 news reports not only conveyed facts but also served different ideologies which shifted over each phase. Both the nyt and cd news media employed lexical devices, images, and metaphors to convey different ideologies, shaping people’s perceptions of the pandemic and government measures to control it. The nyt ’s Covid-19 reporting implied that China’s pandemic measures were irrational and extreme, and that the Trump administration’s policies during the outbreak were ineffective, while feminism and racism also appeared. cd ’s news reports of the pandemic portrayed efficiency by the Chinese government’s in controlling Covid-19 and a positive attitude toward government officials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manusya
Manusya Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
A Corpus-Based Study of the Reflexive Form Tua-eng ‘Self’ in Thai Palace, Prison, Park or Palimpsest? The Contested Heritage of the Former Palace of Chiang Mai A Corpus-Based Study of the Order of Adjectives in Japanese Antonym Sequences: The Role of Markedness and Frequency Locke’s Distinction Between Primary and Secondary Qualities as Partly Correlated with Kant’s Account of The Thing in Itself The Brigands’ Song among the Ngạn People in Northern Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1