015测量睡眠时的身体运动。声纳与视频多导睡眠图

M Lu, D Fitzgerald, C Sullivan, K Waters
{"title":"015测量睡眠时的身体运动。声纳与视频多导睡眠图","authors":"M Lu, D Fitzgerald, C Sullivan, K Waters","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Restless sleep is common in children, and video polysomnography (vPSG) has been used to score body movements during sleep. The Sonomat provides a contactless, portable alternative for home sleep studies over several nights. This study aimed to compare body movements measured by the Sonomat with those scored using vPSG. Methods Twenty-nine children (13 females, 16 males) with a median age of 5.4 years underwent concurrent Sonomat and vPSG studies. Movement indices per hour of sleep period and movement duration (%) were blindly scored on separate days. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon rank test and Pearson's correlations. Results Movement indices were higher on the Sonomat than vPSG (median 38.6/hr vs. 22.7/hr, p < 0.001), but movement duration did not differ (median 10.8% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.092). Comparing movements above 5 seconds, the indices became more comparable (15.9/hr vs. 19.2/hr, p = 0.05). The correlation between devices was weak for movement indices (r = 0.37, p = 0.051) but strong for movement duration (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). The Sonomat identified 82.5% of movements seen on vPSG, while vPSG identified only 43.6% of those on the Sonomat. Conclusion The Sonomat offers a contactless and portable alternative to vPSG for assessing body movements during sleep in children. It exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting shorter movements and was comparable to vPSG in movement duration. These findings suggest that the Sonomat holds promise for evaluating restless sleep in children.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O015 Measuring Body Movements during Sleep. Sonomat Vs Video Polysomnography\",\"authors\":\"M Lu, D Fitzgerald, C Sullivan, K Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Restless sleep is common in children, and video polysomnography (vPSG) has been used to score body movements during sleep. The Sonomat provides a contactless, portable alternative for home sleep studies over several nights. This study aimed to compare body movements measured by the Sonomat with those scored using vPSG. Methods Twenty-nine children (13 females, 16 males) with a median age of 5.4 years underwent concurrent Sonomat and vPSG studies. Movement indices per hour of sleep period and movement duration (%) were blindly scored on separate days. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon rank test and Pearson's correlations. Results Movement indices were higher on the Sonomat than vPSG (median 38.6/hr vs. 22.7/hr, p < 0.001), but movement duration did not differ (median 10.8% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.092). Comparing movements above 5 seconds, the indices became more comparable (15.9/hr vs. 19.2/hr, p = 0.05). The correlation between devices was weak for movement indices (r = 0.37, p = 0.051) but strong for movement duration (r = 0.81, p < 0.001). The Sonomat identified 82.5% of movements seen on vPSG, while vPSG identified only 43.6% of those on the Sonomat. Conclusion The Sonomat offers a contactless and portable alternative to vPSG for assessing body movements during sleep in children. It exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting shorter movements and was comparable to vPSG in movement duration. These findings suggest that the Sonomat holds promise for evaluating restless sleep in children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童睡眠不安是很常见的,视频多导睡眠描记(vPSG)已被用于记录睡眠期间的身体运动。Sonomat为几个晚上的家庭睡眠研究提供了一种非接触式、便携的选择。这项研究旨在比较由索诺玛测量的身体运动和用vPSG评分的身体运动。方法29例儿童(女13例,男16例),中位年龄5.4岁,同时进行索诺玛和vPSG研究。每小时睡眠时间的运动指数和运动持续时间(%)分别在不同的天进行盲法评分。统计分析包括Wilcoxon秩检验和Pearson相关性。结果sononomat组的运动指数高于vPSG组(中位38.6/hr vs. 22.7/hr, p <0.001),但运动持续时间没有差异(中位数10.8% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.092)。对比5秒以上的运动,各项指标更具可比性(15.9/hr vs. 19.2/hr, p = 0.05)。器械与运动指标的相关性较弱(r = 0.37, p = 0.051),与运动持续时间的相关性较强(r = 0.81, p <0.001)。Sonomat识别出vPSG上82.5%的动作,而vPSG仅识别出Sonomat上43.6%的动作。结论:Sonomat为评估儿童睡眠时的身体运动提供了一种非接触式、便携的vPSG替代方案。它在检测较短的运动中表现出更高的灵敏度,在运动持续时间上与vPSG相当。这些发现表明,索诺马特有望评估儿童的不安性睡眠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O015 Measuring Body Movements during Sleep. Sonomat Vs Video Polysomnography
Abstract Background Restless sleep is common in children, and video polysomnography (vPSG) has been used to score body movements during sleep. The Sonomat provides a contactless, portable alternative for home sleep studies over several nights. This study aimed to compare body movements measured by the Sonomat with those scored using vPSG. Methods Twenty-nine children (13 females, 16 males) with a median age of 5.4 years underwent concurrent Sonomat and vPSG studies. Movement indices per hour of sleep period and movement duration (%) were blindly scored on separate days. Statistical analysis included the Wilcoxon rank test and Pearson's correlations. Results Movement indices were higher on the Sonomat than vPSG (median 38.6/hr vs. 22.7/hr, p &lt; 0.001), but movement duration did not differ (median 10.8% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.092). Comparing movements above 5 seconds, the indices became more comparable (15.9/hr vs. 19.2/hr, p = 0.05). The correlation between devices was weak for movement indices (r = 0.37, p = 0.051) but strong for movement duration (r = 0.81, p &lt; 0.001). The Sonomat identified 82.5% of movements seen on vPSG, while vPSG identified only 43.6% of those on the Sonomat. Conclusion The Sonomat offers a contactless and portable alternative to vPSG for assessing body movements during sleep in children. It exhibited higher sensitivity in detecting shorter movements and was comparable to vPSG in movement duration. These findings suggest that the Sonomat holds promise for evaluating restless sleep in children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Central Role of Sulcal Width in the Associations of Sleep Duration and Depression with Cognition in Mid to Late Life Clinical and Financial Significance of Insomnia within a Large Payor-Provider Health System Impact of Real-World Implementation of Evidence-Based Insomnia Treatment within a Large Payor-Provider Health System: Initial Provider and Patient-Level Outcomes Poor Sleep and Inflammatory Gene Expression Among Care Partners of Persons Living with Dementia: A Pilot Trial of a Behavioral Sleep Intervention Sex-Specific Associations Between Habitual Snoring and Cancer Prevalence: Insights from a U.S. Cohort Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1