{"title":"[008]通过研究不同SpO2基线计算方法来改进缺氧负荷算法","authors":"S He, Y Bin, P Cistulli, P de Chazal","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Intermittent hypoxia is a key mechanism linking Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oximetry analysis could enhance understanding of which OSA phenotypes are associated with CVD risk. The hypoxic burden (HB) is a measure calculated from the oximetry signal that shows promise for predicting CVD mortality, but its calculation is complex. With a view to simplifying its calculation, we investigated three different baseline calculation methods and its impact on predicting CVD mortality for the HB algorithm. Methods Data from Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with CVD mortality outcome and complete covariate information was used. We implemented the HB method of Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ. The three baseline methods included an event-based baseline (same as Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ), a record-based baseline, and a fixed baseline. The performance of each parameter in predicting CVD mortality was assessed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis. Results The best performing method was the record-based baseline method which returned a fully adjusted model hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05). The results for the event-based and record-based baseline methods were 1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14) and 1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08) respectively. Discussion HB with the record-based baseline was easier to calculate than the original event-based baseline method by Azarbarzin at al. and resulted in improved CVD mortality prediction performance. We believe that this method provides a step towards providing a novel parameter with easy calculation providing early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.","PeriodicalId":21861,"journal":{"name":"SLEEP Advances","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O008 Refining the Hypoxic Burden Algorithm by Investigating different Methods for Calculating the SpO2 Baseline\",\"authors\":\"S He, Y Bin, P Cistulli, P de Chazal\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Introduction Intermittent hypoxia is a key mechanism linking Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oximetry analysis could enhance understanding of which OSA phenotypes are associated with CVD risk. The hypoxic burden (HB) is a measure calculated from the oximetry signal that shows promise for predicting CVD mortality, but its calculation is complex. With a view to simplifying its calculation, we investigated three different baseline calculation methods and its impact on predicting CVD mortality for the HB algorithm. Methods Data from Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with CVD mortality outcome and complete covariate information was used. We implemented the HB method of Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ. The three baseline methods included an event-based baseline (same as Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ), a record-based baseline, and a fixed baseline. The performance of each parameter in predicting CVD mortality was assessed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis. Results The best performing method was the record-based baseline method which returned a fully adjusted model hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05). The results for the event-based and record-based baseline methods were 1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14) and 1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08) respectively. Discussion HB with the record-based baseline was easier to calculate than the original event-based baseline method by Azarbarzin at al. and resulted in improved CVD mortality prediction performance. We believe that this method provides a step towards providing a novel parameter with easy calculation providing early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SLEEP Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLEEP Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad035.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
间歇性缺氧是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与心血管疾病(CVD)相关的重要机制。血氧饱和度分析有助于了解哪些OSA表型与CVD风险相关。低氧负荷(HB)是一种由血氧测量信号计算出来的指标,有望预测心血管疾病的死亡率,但其计算比较复杂。为了简化其计算,我们研究了三种不同的基线计算方法及其对HB算法预测心血管疾病死亡率的影响。方法采用睡眠心脏健康研究(SHHS)的数据,包括CVD死亡结局和完整的协变量信息。我们实现了Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ的HB方法。三种基线方法包括基于事件的基线(与Azarbarzin et al . 2018 ERJ相同)、基于记录的基线和固定基线。采用调整后的Cox比例风险比(HR)分析评估各参数在预测心血管疾病死亡率方面的表现。结果以记录基线法为最佳方法,其校正后的模型风险比为1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05)。事件基线法和记录基线法的结果分别为1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14)和1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08)。与Azarbarzin等人最初的基于事件的基线方法相比,基于记录基线的HB更容易计算,并导致CVD死亡率预测性能的提高。我们相信,这种方法为提供一个易于计算的新参数提供了一步,为心血管患者提供了早期风险分层。
O008 Refining the Hypoxic Burden Algorithm by Investigating different Methods for Calculating the SpO2 Baseline
Abstract Introduction Intermittent hypoxia is a key mechanism linking Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Oximetry analysis could enhance understanding of which OSA phenotypes are associated with CVD risk. The hypoxic burden (HB) is a measure calculated from the oximetry signal that shows promise for predicting CVD mortality, but its calculation is complex. With a view to simplifying its calculation, we investigated three different baseline calculation methods and its impact on predicting CVD mortality for the HB algorithm. Methods Data from Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with CVD mortality outcome and complete covariate information was used. We implemented the HB method of Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ. The three baseline methods included an event-based baseline (same as Azarbarzin et al 2018 ERJ), a record-based baseline, and a fixed baseline. The performance of each parameter in predicting CVD mortality was assessed using an adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis. Results The best performing method was the record-based baseline method which returned a fully adjusted model hazard ratio of 1.83 (95% CI: 1.03-3.27, p<0.05). The results for the event-based and record-based baseline methods were 1.60 (95% CI: 0.86-3.00, p=0.14) and 1.73 (95% CI: 0.93-3.22, p=0.08) respectively. Discussion HB with the record-based baseline was easier to calculate than the original event-based baseline method by Azarbarzin at al. and resulted in improved CVD mortality prediction performance. We believe that this method provides a step towards providing a novel parameter with easy calculation providing early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.