脱线消除切口

IF 0.4 4区 数学 Q4 LOGIC Archive for Mathematical Logic Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4
Gabriele Pulcini
{"title":"脱线消除切口","authors":"Gabriele Pulcini","doi":"10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We provide a non-Gentzen, though fully syntactical, cut-elimination algorithm for classical propositional logic. The designed procedure is implemented on $$\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the one-sided version of Kleene’s sequent system $$\\textsf{G4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The algorithm here proposed proves to be more ‘dexterous’ than other, more traditional, Gentzen-style techniques as the size of proofs decreases at each step of reduction. As a corollary result, we show that analyticity always guarantees minimality of the size of $$\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -proofs.","PeriodicalId":8350,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cut elimination by unthreading\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Pulcini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We provide a non-Gentzen, though fully syntactical, cut-elimination algorithm for classical propositional logic. The designed procedure is implemented on $$\\\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , the one-sided version of Kleene’s sequent system $$\\\\textsf{G4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The algorithm here proposed proves to be more ‘dexterous’ than other, more traditional, Gentzen-style techniques as the size of proofs decreases at each step of reduction. As a corollary result, we show that analyticity always guarantees minimality of the size of $$\\\\textsf{GS4}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>GS</mml:mi> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> -proofs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-023-00892-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要针对经典命题逻辑,提出了一种非gentzen但完全句法化的切消算法。所设计的程序在Kleene的顺序系统$$\textsf{G4}$$ g4的单侧版本$$\textsf{GS4}$$ gs4上实现。这里提出的算法被证明比其他更传统的根岑风格的技术更“灵巧”,因为在每一步的缩减中,证明的大小都在减少。作为推论结果,我们证明了分析性总是保证$$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4证明的最小大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cut elimination by unthreading
Abstract We provide a non-Gentzen, though fully syntactical, cut-elimination algorithm for classical propositional logic. The designed procedure is implemented on $$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4 , the one-sided version of Kleene’s sequent system $$\textsf{G4}$$ G 4 . The algorithm here proposed proves to be more ‘dexterous’ than other, more traditional, Gentzen-style techniques as the size of proofs decreases at each step of reduction. As a corollary result, we show that analyticity always guarantees minimality of the size of $$\textsf{GS4}$$ GS 4 -proofs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.
期刊最新文献
On categoricity of scattered linear orders of constructive ranks Different covering numbers of compact tree ideals The provably total functions of basic arithmetic and its extensions Undecidability of indecomposable polynomial rings On some $$\Sigma ^{B}_{0}$$ -formulae generalizing counting principles over $$V^{0}$$
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1