在被定罪人缺席的情况下有条件提前释放案件诉讼的司法实践

Elina Dikaeva
{"title":"在被定罪人缺席的情况下有条件提前释放案件诉讼的司法实践","authors":"Elina Dikaeva","doi":"10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.089-096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates the procedural procedure for considering the convicted person’s petition for parole, the process of proving that the convicted person does not need to fully serve the sentence imposed by the court. It is substantiated that the existing procedure for proceedings on parole in the absence of a convicted person contradicts the provisions of article 247 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes that the trial must be conducted with the mandatory participation of the defendant. In the absence of the defendant, the trial is allowed for crimes of small and medium gravity, if the defendant requests it, as well as in exceptional cases in cases of serious and especially serious crimes, if the convicted person is outside of Russia and (or) evades court appearance. In addition, by holding a court session without the participation of the convicted person, the court cannot evaluate the evidence presented for their admissibility and reliability, as well as decide what additional duties should be assigned to the convicted person.","PeriodicalId":40112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial practice of proceedings on cases of conditional early release from punishment in the absence of a convicted person\",\"authors\":\"Elina Dikaeva\",\"doi\":\"10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.089-096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article investigates the procedural procedure for considering the convicted person’s petition for parole, the process of proving that the convicted person does not need to fully serve the sentence imposed by the court. It is substantiated that the existing procedure for proceedings on parole in the absence of a convicted person contradicts the provisions of article 247 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes that the trial must be conducted with the mandatory participation of the defendant. In the absence of the defendant, the trial is allowed for crimes of small and medium gravity, if the defendant requests it, as well as in exceptional cases in cases of serious and especially serious crimes, if the convicted person is outside of Russia and (or) evades court appearance. In addition, by holding a court session without the participation of the convicted person, the court cannot evaluate the evidence presented for their admissibility and reliability, as well as decide what additional duties should be assigned to the convicted person.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.089-096\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Penal Law and Criminology-Ceza Hukuku ve Kriminoloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33463/2687-122x.2023.18(1-4).1.089-096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了对被判刑人假释申请的审议程序,即证明被判刑人不需要完全履行法院判决的过程。有证据表明,在被定罪者缺席的情况下进行假释诉讼的现行程序与《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法》第247条的规定相抵触,该条规定审判必须在被告强制参加的情况下进行。在被告缺席的情况下,如果被告提出请求,允许对轻微和中等严重的罪行进行审判,以及在严重和特别严重罪行的例外情况下,如果被定罪者在俄罗斯境外和(或)逃避出庭,也允许进行审判。此外,由于在没有被定罪者参加的情况下开庭,法院无法评价所提证据的可采性和可靠性,也无法决定应赋予被定罪者哪些额外职责。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial practice of proceedings on cases of conditional early release from punishment in the absence of a convicted person
The article investigates the procedural procedure for considering the convicted person’s petition for parole, the process of proving that the convicted person does not need to fully serve the sentence imposed by the court. It is substantiated that the existing procedure for proceedings on parole in the absence of a convicted person contradicts the provisions of article 247 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes that the trial must be conducted with the mandatory participation of the defendant. In the absence of the defendant, the trial is allowed for crimes of small and medium gravity, if the defendant requests it, as well as in exceptional cases in cases of serious and especially serious crimes, if the convicted person is outside of Russia and (or) evades court appearance. In addition, by holding a court session without the participation of the convicted person, the court cannot evaluate the evidence presented for their admissibility and reliability, as well as decide what additional duties should be assigned to the convicted person.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Public-private partnership in preventing the commission of new crimes in places of deprivation of liberty (on the example of socially dangerous actsof extremist orientation) Legal criteria for separate content convicted persons in places of deprivation of liberty Public-private partnership in the penitentiary sphere: some directions of development Problems of educational work with prisoners sentenced to imprisonment International Scientific and Practical Conference «Problems of legal regulation of applicationvarious types of punishments: criminal law, criminologicaland penal aspects» (Samara Law Institute Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia, January 13, 2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1