英国社会关怀创新中的责任与忽视

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Care and Caring Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1332/239788221x16613769194393
Cian O’Donovan
{"title":"英国社会关怀创新中的责任与忽视","authors":"Cian O’Donovan","doi":"10.1332/239788221x16613769194393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation alters who is accountable for social care and how they are held to account. This article shows how organisational, institutional and technological innovation in infrastructures of social care can reconfigure accountability instruments and propel change between distinct modes of accountability. However, innovation also sustains neglect, both in terms of issues, objects and subjects missing from research, and in terms of low levels of institutional reflexivity mobilised to evaluate and direct innovation’s impacts. Evidenced using two-level situational analysis – across a UK research portfolio and within a public robotics lab – we argue that confronting this neglect is critical for post-pandemic reform.","PeriodicalId":43660,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care and Caring","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accountability and neglect in UK social care innovation\",\"authors\":\"Cian O’Donovan\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/239788221x16613769194393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Innovation alters who is accountable for social care and how they are held to account. This article shows how organisational, institutional and technological innovation in infrastructures of social care can reconfigure accountability instruments and propel change between distinct modes of accountability. However, innovation also sustains neglect, both in terms of issues, objects and subjects missing from research, and in terms of low levels of institutional reflexivity mobilised to evaluate and direct innovation’s impacts. Evidenced using two-level situational analysis – across a UK research portfolio and within a public robotics lab – we argue that confronting this neglect is critical for post-pandemic reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Care and Caring\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Care and Caring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221x16613769194393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care and Caring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221x16613769194393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

创新改变了谁对社会关怀负责以及他们如何承担责任。本文展示了社会关怀基础设施中的组织、制度和技术创新如何能够重新配置问责工具,并推动不同问责模式之间的变革。然而,创新也一直被忽视,无论是在研究中缺失的问题、对象和主题方面,还是在动员评估和指导创新影响的低水平制度反思方面。通过对英国研究组合和公共机器人实验室的两级情景分析,我们认为,面对这种忽视对于大流行后的改革至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accountability and neglect in UK social care innovation
Innovation alters who is accountable for social care and how they are held to account. This article shows how organisational, institutional and technological innovation in infrastructures of social care can reconfigure accountability instruments and propel change between distinct modes of accountability. However, innovation also sustains neglect, both in terms of issues, objects and subjects missing from research, and in terms of low levels of institutional reflexivity mobilised to evaluate and direct innovation’s impacts. Evidenced using two-level situational analysis – across a UK research portfolio and within a public robotics lab – we argue that confronting this neglect is critical for post-pandemic reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Care and Caring
International Journal of Care and Caring SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Navigating the coronavirus pandemic two years on: Experiences of carers of people with dementia from the British IDEAL cohort. Informal care trajectories: developments in care demands, intensity and complexity over the course of care episodes Supporting UK care workers through COVID-19: evidence from The Care Workers’ Charity COVID-19 and Social Determinants of Health: Wicked Issues and Relationalism by Adrian Bonner (ed) (2023) Challenged thriving: a qualitative study of resilience in multiple sclerosis family carers during the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1