超声检测外伤性脑损伤患者颅内压增高视神经鞘直径的诊断准确性:一项系统综述和meta分析

IF 2.3 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomedical reports Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.3892/br.2023.1685
Weiting Chen, Xia Zhang, Xiuxiu Ye, Pan Ying
{"title":"超声检测外伤性脑损伤患者颅内压增高视神经鞘直径的诊断准确性:一项系统综述和meta分析","authors":"Weiting Chen, Xia Zhang, Xiuxiu Ye, Pan Ying","doi":"10.3892/br.2023.1685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The timely diagnosis and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) reduces morbidity rates and prevents mortality. The aim of the present systematic review and meta‑analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) vs. standard invasive ICP measurements in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies including adult patients with TBI with suspected elevated ICP, and the sonographic ONSD measurements were compared with those from a standard invasive method. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‑2 tool by two independent authors. A bivariate random effects model was used to summarize the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A total of eight prospective studies with 222 patients with TBI were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75‑0.88], the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71‑0.90) and the DOR was 17.75 (95% CI, 7.02‑44.83) with partial evidence of heterogeneity. The accuracy of the area under the summary ROC was 0.87. An ultrasound‑determined elevated ICP has reasonable performance indicators with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with TBI. As such, this method may be a useful complementary monitoring tool in acute care.","PeriodicalId":8863,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical reports","volume":"1 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter on ultrasound for the detection of increased intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta‑analysis\",\"authors\":\"Weiting Chen, Xia Zhang, Xiuxiu Ye, Pan Ying\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/br.2023.1685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The timely diagnosis and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) reduces morbidity rates and prevents mortality. The aim of the present systematic review and meta‑analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) vs. standard invasive ICP measurements in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies including adult patients with TBI with suspected elevated ICP, and the sonographic ONSD measurements were compared with those from a standard invasive method. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‑2 tool by two independent authors. A bivariate random effects model was used to summarize the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A total of eight prospective studies with 222 patients with TBI were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75‑0.88], the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71‑0.90) and the DOR was 17.75 (95% CI, 7.02‑44.83) with partial evidence of heterogeneity. The accuracy of the area under the summary ROC was 0.87. An ultrasound‑determined elevated ICP has reasonable performance indicators with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with TBI. As such, this method may be a useful complementary monitoring tool in acute care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical reports\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2023.1685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

及时诊断和治疗颅内压增高可降低发病率,预防死亡率。本系统综述和meta分析的目的是确定视神经鞘直径(ONSD)与标准侵入性颅内压测量在外伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者中的诊断准确性。我们系统地检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,寻找疑似颅内压升高的成年TBI患者,并将超声ONSD测量结果与标准侵入方法进行比较。研究的质量由两位独立作者使用诊断准确性研究质量评估- 2工具进行评估。采用双变量随机效应模型总结合并敏感性、特异性和诊断优势比(DOR)。共纳入8项前瞻性研究,共222例TBI患者。合并敏感性为0.82[95%可信区间(CI), 0.75 ~ 0.88],特异性为0.82 (95% CI, 0.71 ~ 0.90), DOR为17.75 (95% CI, 7.02 ~ 44.83),部分证据表明存在异质性。汇总ROC下面积的准确度为0.87。超声测定颅内压升高具有合理的性能指标,对TBI患者具有较高的敏感性和特异性。因此,这种方法可能是一个有用的补充监测工具,在急性护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter on ultrasound for the detection of increased intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta‑analysis
The timely diagnosis and treatment of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) reduces morbidity rates and prevents mortality. The aim of the present systematic review and meta‑analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) vs. standard invasive ICP measurements in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for studies including adult patients with TBI with suspected elevated ICP, and the sonographic ONSD measurements were compared with those from a standard invasive method. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‑2 tool by two independent authors. A bivariate random effects model was used to summarize the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). A total of eight prospective studies with 222 patients with TBI were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75‑0.88], the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71‑0.90) and the DOR was 17.75 (95% CI, 7.02‑44.83) with partial evidence of heterogeneity. The accuracy of the area under the summary ROC was 0.87. An ultrasound‑determined elevated ICP has reasonable performance indicators with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with TBI. As such, this method may be a useful complementary monitoring tool in acute care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical reports
Biomedical reports MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Biomedical Reports is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, dedicated to publishing research across all fields of biology and medicine, including pharmacology, pathology, gene therapy, genetics, microbiology, neurosciences, infectious diseases, molecular cardiology and molecular surgery. The journal provides a home for original research, case reports and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Age‑related changes in endoplasmic reticulum stress response‑associated protein expression in rat tibial nerves. Remote ischemic conditioning in experimental hepatic ischemia‑reperfusion: A systematic review and meta‑analysis. Telitacicept for systemic lupus erythematosus with post‑surgical papillary thyroid carcinoma: A case report. Effects of aged garlic extract on macrophage functions: a short review of experimental evidence (Review). Redox biomarker levels in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1