两两放射组学算法-病变对关系估计(PRE)模型鉴别多发性原发性肺癌(MPLC)与肺内转移(IPM)

IF 5.1 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Precision Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1093/pcmedi/pbad029
Ting-Fei Chen, Lei Yang, Hai-Bin Chen, Zhi-Guo Zhou, Zhen-Tian Wu, Hong-He Luo, Qiong Li, Ying Zhu
{"title":"两两放射组学算法-病变对关系估计(PRE)模型鉴别多发性原发性肺癌(MPLC)与肺内转移(IPM)","authors":"Ting-Fei Chen, Lei Yang, Hai-Bin Chen, Zhi-Guo Zhou, Zhen-Tian Wu, Hong-He Luo, Qiong Li, Ying Zhu","doi":"10.1093/pcmedi/pbad029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for their disparate treatment strategy and prognosis. This study aimed to establish a non-invasive model to make the differentiation pre-operatively. Methods We retrospectively studied 168 patients with multiple lung cancers (307 pairs of lesions) including 118 cases for modeling and internal validation, and 50 cases for independent external validation. Radiomic features on computed tomography (CT) were extracted to calculate the absolute deviation of paired lesions. Features were then selected by correlation coefficients and random forest classifier five-fold cross-validation, based on which the lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model was developed. A major voting strategy was used to decide diagnosis for cases with multiple pairs of lesions. Cases from another institute were included as the external validation set for the PRE model to compete with two experienced clinicians. Results Seven radiomic features were selected for the PRE model construction. With major voting strategy, the mean area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the training vs. internal validation vs. external validation cohort to distinguish MPLC were 0.983 vs. 0.844 vs. 0.793, 0.942 vs. 0.846 vs. 0.760, 0.905 vs. 0.728 vs. 0.727, and 0.962 vs. 0.910 vs. 0.769, respectively. AUCs of the two clinicians were 0.619 and 0.580. Conclusions The CT radiomic feature-based lesion PRE model is potentially an accurate diagnostic tool for the differentiation of MPLC and IPM, which could help with clinical decision making.","PeriodicalId":33608,"journal":{"name":"Precision Clinical Medicine","volume":"4 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pairwise radiomics algorithm - lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model for distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM)\",\"authors\":\"Ting-Fei Chen, Lei Yang, Hai-Bin Chen, Zhi-Guo Zhou, Zhen-Tian Wu, Hong-He Luo, Qiong Li, Ying Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/pcmedi/pbad029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for their disparate treatment strategy and prognosis. This study aimed to establish a non-invasive model to make the differentiation pre-operatively. Methods We retrospectively studied 168 patients with multiple lung cancers (307 pairs of lesions) including 118 cases for modeling and internal validation, and 50 cases for independent external validation. Radiomic features on computed tomography (CT) were extracted to calculate the absolute deviation of paired lesions. Features were then selected by correlation coefficients and random forest classifier five-fold cross-validation, based on which the lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model was developed. A major voting strategy was used to decide diagnosis for cases with multiple pairs of lesions. Cases from another institute were included as the external validation set for the PRE model to compete with two experienced clinicians. Results Seven radiomic features were selected for the PRE model construction. With major voting strategy, the mean area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the training vs. internal validation vs. external validation cohort to distinguish MPLC were 0.983 vs. 0.844 vs. 0.793, 0.942 vs. 0.846 vs. 0.760, 0.905 vs. 0.728 vs. 0.727, and 0.962 vs. 0.910 vs. 0.769, respectively. AUCs of the two clinicians were 0.619 and 0.580. Conclusions The CT radiomic feature-based lesion PRE model is potentially an accurate diagnostic tool for the differentiation of MPLC and IPM, which could help with clinical decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Precision Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Precision Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbad029\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Precision Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbad029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景区分多发原发性肺癌(MPLC)和肺内转移(IPM)对于其不同的治疗策略和预后至关重要。本研究旨在建立无创模型进行术前鉴别。方法回顾性研究168例多发性肺癌患者(307对病变),其中118例进行建模和内部验证,50例进行独立外部验证。提取计算机断层扫描(CT)上的放射学特征来计算成对病变的绝对偏差。然后通过相关系数和随机森林分类器五重交叉验证选择特征,在此基础上建立病变对关系估计(PRE)模型。一个主要的投票策略被用来决定多对病变病例的诊断。来自另一个研究所的病例被纳入PRE模型的外部验证集,与两位经验丰富的临床医生竞争。结果选取7个放射学特征进行PRE模型构建。在主要投票策略下,训练组、内部验证组和外部验证组区分MPLC的平均受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、准确度、灵敏度和特异性分别为0.983、0.844、0.793、0.942、0.846、0.760、0.905、0.728、0.727、0.962、0.910、0.769。两名临床医生的auc分别为0.619和0.580。结论基于CT放射学特征的病变PRE模型可作为MPLC与IPM鉴别的准确诊断工具,有助于临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A pairwise radiomics algorithm - lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model for distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM)
Abstract Background Distinguishing multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) from intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM) is critical for their disparate treatment strategy and prognosis. This study aimed to establish a non-invasive model to make the differentiation pre-operatively. Methods We retrospectively studied 168 patients with multiple lung cancers (307 pairs of lesions) including 118 cases for modeling and internal validation, and 50 cases for independent external validation. Radiomic features on computed tomography (CT) were extracted to calculate the absolute deviation of paired lesions. Features were then selected by correlation coefficients and random forest classifier five-fold cross-validation, based on which the lesion pair relation estimation (PRE) model was developed. A major voting strategy was used to decide diagnosis for cases with multiple pairs of lesions. Cases from another institute were included as the external validation set for the PRE model to compete with two experienced clinicians. Results Seven radiomic features were selected for the PRE model construction. With major voting strategy, the mean area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the training vs. internal validation vs. external validation cohort to distinguish MPLC were 0.983 vs. 0.844 vs. 0.793, 0.942 vs. 0.846 vs. 0.760, 0.905 vs. 0.728 vs. 0.727, and 0.962 vs. 0.910 vs. 0.769, respectively. AUCs of the two clinicians were 0.619 and 0.580. Conclusions The CT radiomic feature-based lesion PRE model is potentially an accurate diagnostic tool for the differentiation of MPLC and IPM, which could help with clinical decision making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Precision Clinical Medicine
Precision Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Precision Clinical Medicine (PCM) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that provides timely publication of original research articles, case reports, reviews, editorials, and perspectives across the spectrum of precision medicine. The journal's mission is to deliver new theories, methods, and evidence that enhance disease diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and prognosis, thereby establishing a vital communication platform for clinicians and researchers that has the potential to transform medical practice. PCM encompasses all facets of precision medicine, which involves personalized approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, tailored to individual patients or patient subgroups based on their unique genetic, phenotypic, or psychosocial profiles. The clinical conditions addressed by the journal include a wide range of areas such as cancer, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, complex diseases, and rare diseases.
期刊最新文献
Global distribution of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases in neonates. Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing with brain tissue biopsy for diagnosing intracranial lesions in people with HIV. Revisiting ecological fallacy: are single-case experimental study designs even more relevant in the era of precision medicine? Comparative analysis of tertiary lymphoid structures for predicting survival of colorectal cancer: a whole-slide images-based study. Targeted nuclear degranulation of neutrophils promotes the progression of pneumonia in ulcerative colitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1