手工淋巴引流按摩与负压按摩治疗淋巴水肿疗效比较:一项随机对照研究

Sedef ERSOY, Nur KESİKTAŞ, Büşra ŞİRİN, Nazlı Derya BUĞDAYCI, Halime KİBAR, Nurdan PAKER
{"title":"手工淋巴引流按摩与负压按摩治疗淋巴水肿疗效比较:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Sedef ERSOY, Nur KESİKTAŞ, Büşra ŞİRİN, Nazlı Derya BUĞDAYCI, Halime KİBAR, Nurdan PAKER","doi":"10.18621/eurj.1354942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes is a lifelong complication that can be encountered. Its treatment is essential, because it has significant impact on quality of life and daily living activities related to lower extremity involvement. This research aims to compare the effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage (MLD) and Negative Pressure Massage Therapy (NPMT) treatments in order to provide maximum benefit to patients. Methods: This prospective, randomized study included 30 patients with lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes. Patients, randomized using computer software, were divided into two groups. The first group (n =15) received 45 minutes, 15 sessions of MLD, while the second group (n =15) received 45 minutes of 15 sessions of NPMT using the LymphaTouch device. Compression bandaging was applied to both groups and self-drainage training was given to all patients. The circumference of the extremity at 6 reference points were measured and their pain and discomfort assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and after treatment. Changes within the groups and between the groups were compared using the SPSS statistical program. Results: Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters in both treatment groups. The decrease in VAS pain and VAS discomfort scores (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively), circumference measurement of the extremity (p < 0.01) was statistically greater in the NPMT group compared to the MLD group. Conclusions: In conclusion, NPMT appears to be a beneficial non-invasive treatment method for reducing extremity volumes and decreasing subjective pain and discomfort in lymphedema patients.","PeriodicalId":22571,"journal":{"name":"The European Research Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of manual lymphatic drainage massage and negative pressure massage therapy efficacy in lymphedema patients: a randomized controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Sedef ERSOY, Nur KESİKTAŞ, Büşra ŞİRİN, Nazlı Derya BUĞDAYCI, Halime KİBAR, Nurdan PAKER\",\"doi\":\"10.18621/eurj.1354942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes is a lifelong complication that can be encountered. Its treatment is essential, because it has significant impact on quality of life and daily living activities related to lower extremity involvement. This research aims to compare the effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage (MLD) and Negative Pressure Massage Therapy (NPMT) treatments in order to provide maximum benefit to patients. Methods: This prospective, randomized study included 30 patients with lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes. Patients, randomized using computer software, were divided into two groups. The first group (n =15) received 45 minutes, 15 sessions of MLD, while the second group (n =15) received 45 minutes of 15 sessions of NPMT using the LymphaTouch device. Compression bandaging was applied to both groups and self-drainage training was given to all patients. The circumference of the extremity at 6 reference points were measured and their pain and discomfort assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and after treatment. Changes within the groups and between the groups were compared using the SPSS statistical program. Results: Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters in both treatment groups. The decrease in VAS pain and VAS discomfort scores (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01; respectively), circumference measurement of the extremity (p < 0.01) was statistically greater in the NPMT group compared to the MLD group. Conclusions: In conclusion, NPMT appears to be a beneficial non-invasive treatment method for reducing extremity volumes and decreasing subjective pain and discomfort in lymphedema patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1354942\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1354942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下肢淋巴水肿由于继发性原因是一个终身并发症,可以遇到。其治疗是必不可少的,因为它对与下肢受累相关的生活质量和日常生活活动有重大影响。本研究旨在比较手动淋巴引流按摩(MLD)和负压按摩治疗(NPMT)的效果,以期为患者提供最大的益处。方法:这项前瞻性、随机研究纳入了30例继发性下肢淋巴水肿患者。使用计算机软件将患者随机分为两组。第一组(n =15)接受45分钟15次MLD治疗,第二组(n =15)接受45分钟15次淋巴触摸设备NPMT治疗。两组均采用压迫包扎,所有患者均进行自引流训练。测量6个参考点的四肢周长,用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评价治疗前后的疼痛和不适。使用SPSS统计程序比较组内和组间的变化。结果:两组患者各项指标改善均有统计学意义。VAS疼痛和VAS不适评分降低(p <0.05和p <0.01;(p <;NPMT组与MLD组比较,差异有统计学意义(0.01)。结论:NPMT是一种有益的非侵入性治疗方法,可以减少淋巴水肿患者的肢体体积,减少主观疼痛和不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of manual lymphatic drainage massage and negative pressure massage therapy efficacy in lymphedema patients: a randomized controlled study
Objectives: Lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes is a lifelong complication that can be encountered. Its treatment is essential, because it has significant impact on quality of life and daily living activities related to lower extremity involvement. This research aims to compare the effects of Manual Lymphatic Drainage Massage (MLD) and Negative Pressure Massage Therapy (NPMT) treatments in order to provide maximum benefit to patients. Methods: This prospective, randomized study included 30 patients with lower extremity lymphedema due to secondary causes. Patients, randomized using computer software, were divided into two groups. The first group (n =15) received 45 minutes, 15 sessions of MLD, while the second group (n =15) received 45 minutes of 15 sessions of NPMT using the LymphaTouch device. Compression bandaging was applied to both groups and self-drainage training was given to all patients. The circumference of the extremity at 6 reference points were measured and their pain and discomfort assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were recorded before and after treatment. Changes within the groups and between the groups were compared using the SPSS statistical program. Results: Statistically significant improvement was observed in all parameters in both treatment groups. The decrease in VAS pain and VAS discomfort scores (p &lt; 0.05 and p &lt; 0.01; respectively), circumference measurement of the extremity (p &lt; 0.01) was statistically greater in the NPMT group compared to the MLD group. Conclusions: In conclusion, NPMT appears to be a beneficial non-invasive treatment method for reducing extremity volumes and decreasing subjective pain and discomfort in lymphedema patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy: comparison of visual outcomes, graft survival rates, and complications Eisenmenger syndrome presenting with chronic thromboembolic disease Exploring menopausal dynamics: a cross-sectional analysis of age, symptomatology, and sociodemographic influences in a developing population of women aged 40-60 Rheumatology nurses’ knowledge and practices on pain management Relationship between fortilin levels and coronary ischemia in heart failure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1