James Hooper, Yuanyuan Liu, Darshita Budhadev, Dario Fernandez Ainaga, Nicole Hondow, Dejian Zhou* and Yuan Guo*,
{"title":"多价聚糖量子点作为揭示多价凝集素-聚糖相互作用的热力学、动力学和结构细节的多功能工具","authors":"James Hooper, Yuanyuan Liu, Darshita Budhadev, Dario Fernandez Ainaga, Nicole Hondow, Dejian Zhou* and Yuan Guo*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsami.2c11111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Multivalent lectin–glycan interactions (MLGIs) are widespread and vital for biology. Their binding biophysical and structural details are thus highly valuable, not only for the understanding of binding affinity and specificity mechanisms but also for guiding the design of multivalent therapeutics against specific MLGIs. However, effective techniques that can reveal all such details remain unavailable. We have recently developed polyvalent glycan quantum dots (glycan-QDs) as a new probe for MLGIs. Using a pair of closely related tetrameric viral-binding lectins, DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR, as model examples, we have revealed and quantified their large affinity differences in glycan-QD binding are due to distinct binding modes: with simultaneous binding for DC-SIGN and cross-linking for DC-SIGNR. Herein, we further extend the capacity of the glycan-QD probes by investigating the correlation between binding mode and binding thermodynamics and kinetics and further probing a structural basis of their binding nature. We reveal that while both lectins’ binding with glycan-QDs is enthalpy driven with similar binding enthalpy changes, DC-SIGN pays a lower binding entropy penalty, resulting in a higher affinity than DC-SIGNR. We then show that DC-SIGN binding gives a single second-order <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> rate, whereas DC-SIGNR gives a rapid initial binding followed by a much slower secondary interaction. We further identify a structural element in DC-SIGN, absent in DC-SIGNR, that plays an important role in maintaining DC-SIGN’s MLGI character. Its removal switches the binding from being enthalpically to entropically driven and gives mixed binding modes containing both simultaneous and cross-linking binding behavior, without markedly affecting the overall binding affinity and kinetics</p>","PeriodicalId":8,"journal":{"name":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","volume":"14 42","pages":"47385–47396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsami.2c11111","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polyvalent Glycan Quantum Dots as a Multifunctional Tool for Revealing Thermodynamic, Kinetic, and Structural Details of Multivalent Lectin–Glycan Interactions\",\"authors\":\"James Hooper, Yuanyuan Liu, Darshita Budhadev, Dario Fernandez Ainaga, Nicole Hondow, Dejian Zhou* and Yuan Guo*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsami.2c11111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Multivalent lectin–glycan interactions (MLGIs) are widespread and vital for biology. Their binding biophysical and structural details are thus highly valuable, not only for the understanding of binding affinity and specificity mechanisms but also for guiding the design of multivalent therapeutics against specific MLGIs. However, effective techniques that can reveal all such details remain unavailable. We have recently developed polyvalent glycan quantum dots (glycan-QDs) as a new probe for MLGIs. Using a pair of closely related tetrameric viral-binding lectins, DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR, as model examples, we have revealed and quantified their large affinity differences in glycan-QD binding are due to distinct binding modes: with simultaneous binding for DC-SIGN and cross-linking for DC-SIGNR. Herein, we further extend the capacity of the glycan-QD probes by investigating the correlation between binding mode and binding thermodynamics and kinetics and further probing a structural basis of their binding nature. We reveal that while both lectins’ binding with glycan-QDs is enthalpy driven with similar binding enthalpy changes, DC-SIGN pays a lower binding entropy penalty, resulting in a higher affinity than DC-SIGNR. We then show that DC-SIGN binding gives a single second-order <i>k</i><sub>on</sub> rate, whereas DC-SIGNR gives a rapid initial binding followed by a much slower secondary interaction. We further identify a structural element in DC-SIGN, absent in DC-SIGNR, that plays an important role in maintaining DC-SIGN’s MLGI character. Its removal switches the binding from being enthalpically to entropically driven and gives mixed binding modes containing both simultaneous and cross-linking binding behavior, without markedly affecting the overall binding affinity and kinetics</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 42\",\"pages\":\"47385–47396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acsami.2c11111\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c11111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.2c11111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Polyvalent Glycan Quantum Dots as a Multifunctional Tool for Revealing Thermodynamic, Kinetic, and Structural Details of Multivalent Lectin–Glycan Interactions
Multivalent lectin–glycan interactions (MLGIs) are widespread and vital for biology. Their binding biophysical and structural details are thus highly valuable, not only for the understanding of binding affinity and specificity mechanisms but also for guiding the design of multivalent therapeutics against specific MLGIs. However, effective techniques that can reveal all such details remain unavailable. We have recently developed polyvalent glycan quantum dots (glycan-QDs) as a new probe for MLGIs. Using a pair of closely related tetrameric viral-binding lectins, DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR, as model examples, we have revealed and quantified their large affinity differences in glycan-QD binding are due to distinct binding modes: with simultaneous binding for DC-SIGN and cross-linking for DC-SIGNR. Herein, we further extend the capacity of the glycan-QD probes by investigating the correlation between binding mode and binding thermodynamics and kinetics and further probing a structural basis of their binding nature. We reveal that while both lectins’ binding with glycan-QDs is enthalpy driven with similar binding enthalpy changes, DC-SIGN pays a lower binding entropy penalty, resulting in a higher affinity than DC-SIGNR. We then show that DC-SIGN binding gives a single second-order kon rate, whereas DC-SIGNR gives a rapid initial binding followed by a much slower secondary interaction. We further identify a structural element in DC-SIGN, absent in DC-SIGNR, that plays an important role in maintaining DC-SIGN’s MLGI character. Its removal switches the binding from being enthalpically to entropically driven and gives mixed binding modes containing both simultaneous and cross-linking binding behavior, without markedly affecting the overall binding affinity and kinetics
期刊介绍:
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering is the leading journal in the field of biomaterials, serving as an international forum for publishing cutting-edge research and innovative ideas on a broad range of topics:
Applications and Health – implantable tissues and devices, prosthesis, health risks, toxicology
Bio-interactions and Bio-compatibility – material-biology interactions, chemical/morphological/structural communication, mechanobiology, signaling and biological responses, immuno-engineering, calcification, coatings, corrosion and degradation of biomaterials and devices, biophysical regulation of cell functions
Characterization, Synthesis, and Modification – new biomaterials, bioinspired and biomimetic approaches to biomaterials, exploiting structural hierarchy and architectural control, combinatorial strategies for biomaterials discovery, genetic biomaterials design, synthetic biology, new composite systems, bionics, polymer synthesis
Controlled Release and Delivery Systems – biomaterial-based drug and gene delivery, bio-responsive delivery of regulatory molecules, pharmaceutical engineering
Healthcare Advances – clinical translation, regulatory issues, patient safety, emerging trends
Imaging and Diagnostics – imaging agents and probes, theranostics, biosensors, monitoring
Manufacturing and Technology – 3D printing, inks, organ-on-a-chip, bioreactor/perfusion systems, microdevices, BioMEMS, optics and electronics interfaces with biomaterials, systems integration
Modeling and Informatics Tools – scaling methods to guide biomaterial design, predictive algorithms for structure-function, biomechanics, integrating bioinformatics with biomaterials discovery, metabolomics in the context of biomaterials
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine – basic and applied studies, cell therapies, scaffolds, vascularization, bioartificial organs, transplantation and functionality, cellular agriculture