在降雨模拟器下,农药从土壤中提取到径流中

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Research Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1071/sr22115
D. Mark Silburn
{"title":"在降雨模拟器下,农药从土壤中提取到径流中","authors":"D. Mark Silburn","doi":"10.1071/sr22115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Runoff estimation is an important aspect of pesticide environmental behaviour and is the major loss pathway to the environment. Aims To improve understanding of pesticide runoff. Methods Data from three rainfall simulator studies was used. Twelve pesticides were studied ranged from tightly sorbed (DDE, soil sorption coefficient (KD) ~15 000 L kg−1) to weakly sorbed (dimethoate, KD < 30). Key results Event runoff pesticide concentrations were closely related to soil concentrations (0–25 mm depth). The ratio of runoff to soil concentration (the runoff extraction ratio, ERO), was similar for pesticides with a wide range of sorption and across the three soils: runoff concentration (μg L−1) = 28 × soil concentration (mg kg−1). ERO decreased with time after spraying, presumably due to lower concentrations in the top few mm of soil. Conclusions This model provides improved or similar estimates of pesticide runoff than previous models. Similar ERO values between sites was probably due to similar hydrology (high rainfall intensity, surface sealing, moist subsoils) and erosion, and because the same masses of soil and water are involved in mixing. Reduction in runoff concentrations by leaching was not influential, because infiltration was small and soil sorption too high. Implications Conditions studied apply during summer storms on most cotton and grain land on clay soils in the northern grain and cotton lands in eastern Australia. The model should be applicable under these conditions.","PeriodicalId":21818,"journal":{"name":"Soil Research","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pesticide extraction from soil into runoff under a rainfall simulator\",\"authors\":\"D. Mark Silburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/sr22115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context Runoff estimation is an important aspect of pesticide environmental behaviour and is the major loss pathway to the environment. Aims To improve understanding of pesticide runoff. Methods Data from three rainfall simulator studies was used. Twelve pesticides were studied ranged from tightly sorbed (DDE, soil sorption coefficient (KD) ~15 000 L kg−1) to weakly sorbed (dimethoate, KD < 30). Key results Event runoff pesticide concentrations were closely related to soil concentrations (0–25 mm depth). The ratio of runoff to soil concentration (the runoff extraction ratio, ERO), was similar for pesticides with a wide range of sorption and across the three soils: runoff concentration (μg L−1) = 28 × soil concentration (mg kg−1). ERO decreased with time after spraying, presumably due to lower concentrations in the top few mm of soil. Conclusions This model provides improved or similar estimates of pesticide runoff than previous models. Similar ERO values between sites was probably due to similar hydrology (high rainfall intensity, surface sealing, moist subsoils) and erosion, and because the same masses of soil and water are involved in mixing. Reduction in runoff concentrations by leaching was not influential, because infiltration was small and soil sorption too high. Implications Conditions studied apply during summer storms on most cotton and grain land on clay soils in the northern grain and cotton lands in eastern Australia. The model should be applicable under these conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Research\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/sr22115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/sr22115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

径流估算是农药环境行为的一个重要方面,是农药对环境的主要损失途径。目的提高对农药径流的认识。方法采用三个降雨模拟试验的数据。所研究的12种农药从紧密吸附型(DDE,土壤吸附系数(KD) ~15 000 L kg−1)到弱吸附型(乐果,KD <30)。事件径流农药浓度与土壤浓度密切相关(0 ~ 25 mm深度)。对于具有广泛吸附范围的农药,在三种土壤中,径流与土壤浓度的比值(径流提取比,ERO)相似:径流浓度(μg L−1)= 28 ×土壤浓度(mg kg−1)。喷施后,ERO随着时间的推移而下降,可能是由于土壤顶部几毫米的浓度较低。与以前的模型相比,该模型提供了改进的或类似的农药径流估计。地点之间相似的ERO值可能是由于相似的水文(高降雨强度、地表密封、潮湿的底土)和侵蚀,以及参与混合的土壤和水的质量相同。由于入渗量小,土壤吸收量太高,淋滤对径流浓度的降低没有影响。所研究的条件在夏季风暴期间适用于澳大利亚东部北部谷物和棉花地的粘土上的大多数棉花和谷物地。该模型应适用于这些条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pesticide extraction from soil into runoff under a rainfall simulator
Context Runoff estimation is an important aspect of pesticide environmental behaviour and is the major loss pathway to the environment. Aims To improve understanding of pesticide runoff. Methods Data from three rainfall simulator studies was used. Twelve pesticides were studied ranged from tightly sorbed (DDE, soil sorption coefficient (KD) ~15 000 L kg−1) to weakly sorbed (dimethoate, KD < 30). Key results Event runoff pesticide concentrations were closely related to soil concentrations (0–25 mm depth). The ratio of runoff to soil concentration (the runoff extraction ratio, ERO), was similar for pesticides with a wide range of sorption and across the three soils: runoff concentration (μg L−1) = 28 × soil concentration (mg kg−1). ERO decreased with time after spraying, presumably due to lower concentrations in the top few mm of soil. Conclusions This model provides improved or similar estimates of pesticide runoff than previous models. Similar ERO values between sites was probably due to similar hydrology (high rainfall intensity, surface sealing, moist subsoils) and erosion, and because the same masses of soil and water are involved in mixing. Reduction in runoff concentrations by leaching was not influential, because infiltration was small and soil sorption too high. Implications Conditions studied apply during summer storms on most cotton and grain land on clay soils in the northern grain and cotton lands in eastern Australia. The model should be applicable under these conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Research
Soil Research SOIL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Soil Research (formerly known as Australian Journal of Soil Research) is an international journal that aims to rapidly publish high-quality, novel research about fundamental and applied aspects of soil science. As well as publishing in traditional aspects of soil biology, soil physics and soil chemistry across terrestrial ecosystems, the journal welcomes manuscripts dealing with wider interactions of soils with the environment. Soil Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
期刊最新文献
Gypsum form and rate can affect soil physicochemical properties and crop productivity in soils of low electrical conductivity that have been enriched by sodium due to supplementary irrigation Analysis of soil erosion dynamics and its driving factors in the Qilian Mountains of Qingdong Modified fungal diversity in dense clay subsoils after deep-banding organic substrate Effects of wetting and drying alternation on the shear properties of root-loess composites Spatial and temporal distribution and environmental determinants of freeze-thaw erosion intensity in Qiangtang grasslands, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1