风险投资支持对新上市公司创新的影响

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Empirical Finance Pub Date : 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101436
Serdar Aldatmaz , Ugur Celikyurt
{"title":"风险投资支持对新上市公司创新的影响","authors":"Serdar Aldatmaz ,&nbsp;Ugur Celikyurt","doi":"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the effect of VC-backing on innovation in newly public firms and find that it is negatively related to patents produced and citations received within the initial years following an IPO – our estimates indicate that VC-backed firms produce 13% fewer patents than nonVC-backed firms within the first year post-IPO. Our findings suggest that this adverse effect is a consequence of VCs timing their portfolio companies’ IPOs at the peak of innovation followed by a decline post-IPO. Additionally, VC-backing leads to higher growth in sales and productivity in newly public firms pointing to a shift in VC focus from creating into commercializing innovation post-IPO. We address endogeneity concerns with an instrumental variables approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Empirical Finance","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of venture capital backing on innovation in newly public firms\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Aldatmaz ,&nbsp;Ugur Celikyurt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jempfin.2023.101436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study the effect of VC-backing on innovation in newly public firms and find that it is negatively related to patents produced and citations received within the initial years following an IPO – our estimates indicate that VC-backed firms produce 13% fewer patents than nonVC-backed firms within the first year post-IPO. Our findings suggest that this adverse effect is a consequence of VCs timing their portfolio companies’ IPOs at the peak of innovation followed by a decline post-IPO. Additionally, VC-backing leads to higher growth in sales and productivity in newly public firms pointing to a shift in VC focus from creating into commercializing innovation post-IPO. We address endogeneity concerns with an instrumental variables approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Empirical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539823001032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Empirical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539823001032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了风投支持对新上市公司创新的影响,发现它与IPO后最初几年的专利产量和引用量呈负相关——我们的估计表明,在IPO后的第一年,风投支持的公司的专利产量比非风投支持的公司少13%。我们的研究结果表明,这种不利影响是风险投资公司将其投资组合公司的ipo选择在创新高峰期,随后在ipo后下降的结果。此外,风投支持导致新上市公司的销售额和生产率更高的增长,这表明风投的重点从创造转向商业化创新。我们用工具变量的方法来解决内生性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of venture capital backing on innovation in newly public firms

We study the effect of VC-backing on innovation in newly public firms and find that it is negatively related to patents produced and citations received within the initial years following an IPO – our estimates indicate that VC-backed firms produce 13% fewer patents than nonVC-backed firms within the first year post-IPO. Our findings suggest that this adverse effect is a consequence of VCs timing their portfolio companies’ IPOs at the peak of innovation followed by a decline post-IPO. Additionally, VC-backing leads to higher growth in sales and productivity in newly public firms pointing to a shift in VC focus from creating into commercializing innovation post-IPO. We address endogeneity concerns with an instrumental variables approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Empirical Finance is a financial economics journal whose aim is to publish high quality articles in empirical finance. Empirical finance is interpreted broadly to include any type of empirical work in financial economics, financial econometrics, and also theoretical work with clear empirical implications, even when there is no empirical analysis. The Journal welcomes articles in all fields of finance, such as asset pricing, corporate finance, financial econometrics, banking, international finance, microstructure, behavioural finance, etc. The Editorial Team is willing to take risks on innovative research, controversial papers, and unusual approaches. We are also particularly interested in work produced by young scholars. The composition of the editorial board reflects such goals.
期刊最新文献
High-frequency realized stochastic volatility model Jump tail risk exposure and the cross-section of stock returns Time-varying variance decomposition of macro-finance term structure models Technological shocks and stock market volatility over a century Is firm-level political risk priced in the corporate bond market?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1