全面评估喷雾局部排气通风的喷雾布置策略

Q1 Engineering Energy and Built Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI:10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.10.005
{"title":"全面评估喷雾局部排气通风的喷雾布置策略","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A well-designed spray system, which is located near the source of high-temperature smoke, can improve the capture efficiency of traditional local exhaust ventilation (LEV). However, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation index that clearly reflects the performance of spray-local exhaust ventilation (SLEV), making it challenging to optimize the spray arrangement. The two-phase flow fields in the SLEV and LEV were compared to evaluate the impact of spray on smoke control. The effects of spray arrangement parameters, such as spray position, spacing, initial droplet size, and angle, on the performance of the SLEV system were further evaluated using current evaluation indicators. Based on this, we developed a comprehensive evaluation model for SLEV using the AHP-entropy combination weighting method. The results revealed that the decrease in smoke control with an increase in rolling speed is primarily caused by a reduction in spray control in the central region of the smoke. When the spray flow rate is 0.0028 kg/s and the velocity is 30 m/s, the primary factor that improves ventilation performance is the downward drag force exerted by the spray on smoke, rather than the cooling effect. The comprehensive model was developed using weights of 0.45, 0.34, and 0.21 for the three evaluation indicators: capture efficiency, high-quality concentration field ratio, and spatial droplet size. The model showed good reliability based on the results of the smoke concentration analysis. The results of this study are expected to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of SLEV systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33659,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Built Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 173-186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323001010/pdfft?md5=f3af9cfac73babcfdb2937ed3399b6e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666123323001010-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive evaluation of spray arrangement strategies for spray-local exhaust ventilation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A well-designed spray system, which is located near the source of high-temperature smoke, can improve the capture efficiency of traditional local exhaust ventilation (LEV). However, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation index that clearly reflects the performance of spray-local exhaust ventilation (SLEV), making it challenging to optimize the spray arrangement. The two-phase flow fields in the SLEV and LEV were compared to evaluate the impact of spray on smoke control. The effects of spray arrangement parameters, such as spray position, spacing, initial droplet size, and angle, on the performance of the SLEV system were further evaluated using current evaluation indicators. Based on this, we developed a comprehensive evaluation model for SLEV using the AHP-entropy combination weighting method. The results revealed that the decrease in smoke control with an increase in rolling speed is primarily caused by a reduction in spray control in the central region of the smoke. When the spray flow rate is 0.0028 kg/s and the velocity is 30 m/s, the primary factor that improves ventilation performance is the downward drag force exerted by the spray on smoke, rather than the cooling effect. The comprehensive model was developed using weights of 0.45, 0.34, and 0.21 for the three evaluation indicators: capture efficiency, high-quality concentration field ratio, and spatial droplet size. The model showed good reliability based on the results of the smoke concentration analysis. The results of this study are expected to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of SLEV systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy and Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 173-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323001010/pdfft?md5=f3af9cfac73babcfdb2937ed3399b6e9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666123323001010-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy and Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323001010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666123323001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计合理的喷雾系统位于高温烟雾源附近,可以提高传统局部排气通风(LEV)的捕获效率。然而,目前还没有明确反映喷雾局部排气通风(SLEV)性能的综合评价指标,这给优化喷雾布置带来了挑战。我们比较了 SLEV 和 LEV 中的两相流场,以评估喷雾对烟雾控制的影响。利用当前的评价指标,进一步评估了喷雾布置参数(如喷雾位置、间距、初始液滴大小和角度)对 SLEV 系统性能的影响。在此基础上,我们利用 AHP-熵组合加权法建立了 SLEV 综合评价模型。结果表明,随着滚动速度的增加,烟雾控制能力下降的主要原因是烟雾中心区域的喷雾控制能力下降。当喷雾流量为 0.0028 kg/s、速度为 30 m/s 时,改善通风性能的主要因素是喷雾对烟雾施加的向下阻力,而不是冷却效果。综合模型的建立采用了 0.45、0.34 和 0.21 三个权重的评价指标:捕获效率、高质量浓度场比和空间液滴大小。根据烟雾浓度分析结果,该模型显示出良好的可靠性。本研究的结果有望为 SLEV 系统的设计、实施和评估提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comprehensive evaluation of spray arrangement strategies for spray-local exhaust ventilation

A well-designed spray system, which is located near the source of high-temperature smoke, can improve the capture efficiency of traditional local exhaust ventilation (LEV). However, there is currently no comprehensive evaluation index that clearly reflects the performance of spray-local exhaust ventilation (SLEV), making it challenging to optimize the spray arrangement. The two-phase flow fields in the SLEV and LEV were compared to evaluate the impact of spray on smoke control. The effects of spray arrangement parameters, such as spray position, spacing, initial droplet size, and angle, on the performance of the SLEV system were further evaluated using current evaluation indicators. Based on this, we developed a comprehensive evaluation model for SLEV using the AHP-entropy combination weighting method. The results revealed that the decrease in smoke control with an increase in rolling speed is primarily caused by a reduction in spray control in the central region of the smoke. When the spray flow rate is 0.0028 kg/s and the velocity is 30 m/s, the primary factor that improves ventilation performance is the downward drag force exerted by the spray on smoke, rather than the cooling effect. The comprehensive model was developed using weights of 0.45, 0.34, and 0.21 for the three evaluation indicators: capture efficiency, high-quality concentration field ratio, and spatial droplet size. The model showed good reliability based on the results of the smoke concentration analysis. The results of this study are expected to guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of SLEV systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy and Built Environment
Energy and Built Environment Engineering-Building and Construction
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Overview of the application status and development trends of hydropower and geothermal power in New Zealand Study on the Deposition Characteristics of Fine Particles at Local Components in Air Conditioning Ventilation Ducts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1