反思知识界面的研究和非土著研究人员非殖民化转型遗忘的重要性

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Social Research Methodology Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027
Emma George
{"title":"反思知识界面的研究和非土著研究人员非殖民化转型遗忘的重要性","authors":"Emma George","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTDecolonising methodology requires that researchers engage in a process of learning and unlearning. This research on the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous rights and social determinants of Indigenous health in Australian policy implementation was positioned at the interface of knowledge systems and drew on a weaving metaphor to guide reflection on learning and unlearning. The aim of this paper is to share a reflection on this research methodology from a non-Indigenous standpoint. Reflexivity, deep listening, peer mentoring and supervision are identified as essential components of decolonising methodology. Through the process of weaving, both practically and philosophically, the significance of transformational unlearning is discussed. This reflection is offered as an example to other non-Indigenous researchers who are open to the challenge of decolonising research at the interface of knowledge.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondecolonising methodologyinterface of knowledgeweaving AcknowledgmentsThis research was conducted on the traditional land of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and on the land of the Yorta Yorta and Bangerang people of the Greater Shepparton region. The Author pays respect to Elders past and present, and acknowledges the contribution, insight and wisdom of all of the participants in this research. The author acknowledges the support and guidance received from PhD supervisors, Professor Fran Baum, Associate Professor Tamara Mackean, and Dr Matt Fisher, along with critical friends, Dr Courtney Ryder and Mr Tirritpa Ritchie.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Social Determinants of Health Equity: policy research on the social determinants of health equity (APP1078046). The author received a PhD scholarship funded by the NHMRC which was topped up by Flinders University.Notes on contributorsEmma GeorgeAssociate Professor Emma George is an occupational therapist with a PhD in public health. Her research explores ways to address health inequities among marginalised people with a commitment to social and occupational justice. Her research focuses on national policy implementation, the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities, and recovery from exploitation and modern slavery in Australia and India. She is the Program Director for Occupational Therapy at the University of Adelaide","PeriodicalId":14272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting on research at the interface of knowledge and the importance of decolonising transformational unlearning for non-Indigenous researchers\",\"authors\":\"Emma George\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTDecolonising methodology requires that researchers engage in a process of learning and unlearning. This research on the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous rights and social determinants of Indigenous health in Australian policy implementation was positioned at the interface of knowledge systems and drew on a weaving metaphor to guide reflection on learning and unlearning. The aim of this paper is to share a reflection on this research methodology from a non-Indigenous standpoint. Reflexivity, deep listening, peer mentoring and supervision are identified as essential components of decolonising methodology. Through the process of weaving, both practically and philosophically, the significance of transformational unlearning is discussed. This reflection is offered as an example to other non-Indigenous researchers who are open to the challenge of decolonising research at the interface of knowledge.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondecolonising methodologyinterface of knowledgeweaving AcknowledgmentsThis research was conducted on the traditional land of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and on the land of the Yorta Yorta and Bangerang people of the Greater Shepparton region. The Author pays respect to Elders past and present, and acknowledges the contribution, insight and wisdom of all of the participants in this research. The author acknowledges the support and guidance received from PhD supervisors, Professor Fran Baum, Associate Professor Tamara Mackean, and Dr Matt Fisher, along with critical friends, Dr Courtney Ryder and Mr Tirritpa Ritchie.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Social Determinants of Health Equity: policy research on the social determinants of health equity (APP1078046). The author received a PhD scholarship funded by the NHMRC which was topped up by Flinders University.Notes on contributorsEmma GeorgeAssociate Professor Emma George is an occupational therapist with a PhD in public health. Her research explores ways to address health inequities among marginalised people with a commitment to social and occupational justice. Her research focuses on national policy implementation, the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities, and recovery from exploitation and modern slavery in Australia and India. She is the Program Director for Occupational Therapy at the University of Adelaide\",\"PeriodicalId\":14272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2023.2269027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】非殖民化方法论要求研究者参与一个学习和放弃学习的过程。这项关于在澳大利亚政策实施中对土著权利和土著健康的社会决定因素的不一致承认的研究定位于知识系统的界面,并利用编织隐喻来指导对学习和放弃学习的反思。本文的目的是分享从非土著立场对这一研究方法的反思。反思、深度倾听、同伴指导和监督被认为是非殖民化方法的重要组成部分。通过编织的过程,从实践和哲学两个方面探讨了转型遗忘的意义。这一反思为其他非土著研究人员提供了一个例子,他们愿意在知识界面上接受非殖民化研究的挑战。本研究在阿德莱德平原考尔纳人(Kaurna)的传统土地和大谢普顿地区约塔约塔人(Yorta Yorta)和Bangerang人的土地上进行。作者对过去和现在的长者表示敬意,并对所有参与这项研究的人的贡献、洞察力和智慧表示感谢。作者感谢博士导师Fran Baum教授、Tamara Mackean副教授和Matt Fisher博士以及重要的朋友Courtney Ryder博士和Tirritpa Ritchie先生的支持和指导。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了NHMRC健康公平的社会决定因素卓越研究中心的支持:健康公平的社会决定因素政策研究(APP1078046)。作者获得了由NHMRC资助的博士奖学金,并由弗林德斯大学充值。副教授Emma George是一名职业治疗师,拥有公共卫生博士学位。她的研究探索了如何解决边缘化人群的健康不平等问题,并致力于社会和职业正义。她的研究重点是国家政策的实施,土著和托雷斯海峡岛民和社区的健康和福祉,以及澳大利亚和印度的剥削和现代奴隶制的恢复。她是阿德莱德大学职业治疗项目主任
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflecting on research at the interface of knowledge and the importance of decolonising transformational unlearning for non-Indigenous researchers
ABSTRACTDecolonising methodology requires that researchers engage in a process of learning and unlearning. This research on the inconsistent recognition of Indigenous rights and social determinants of Indigenous health in Australian policy implementation was positioned at the interface of knowledge systems and drew on a weaving metaphor to guide reflection on learning and unlearning. The aim of this paper is to share a reflection on this research methodology from a non-Indigenous standpoint. Reflexivity, deep listening, peer mentoring and supervision are identified as essential components of decolonising methodology. Through the process of weaving, both practically and philosophically, the significance of transformational unlearning is discussed. This reflection is offered as an example to other non-Indigenous researchers who are open to the challenge of decolonising research at the interface of knowledge.KEYWORDS: Reflectiondecolonising methodologyinterface of knowledgeweaving AcknowledgmentsThis research was conducted on the traditional land of the Kaurna people of the Adelaide Plains and on the land of the Yorta Yorta and Bangerang people of the Greater Shepparton region. The Author pays respect to Elders past and present, and acknowledges the contribution, insight and wisdom of all of the participants in this research. The author acknowledges the support and guidance received from PhD supervisors, Professor Fran Baum, Associate Professor Tamara Mackean, and Dr Matt Fisher, along with critical friends, Dr Courtney Ryder and Mr Tirritpa Ritchie.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Social Determinants of Health Equity: policy research on the social determinants of health equity (APP1078046). The author received a PhD scholarship funded by the NHMRC which was topped up by Flinders University.Notes on contributorsEmma GeorgeAssociate Professor Emma George is an occupational therapist with a PhD in public health. Her research explores ways to address health inequities among marginalised people with a commitment to social and occupational justice. Her research focuses on national policy implementation, the health and well-being of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities, and recovery from exploitation and modern slavery in Australia and India. She is the Program Director for Occupational Therapy at the University of Adelaide
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
International Journal of Social Research Methodology SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Linking survey and Facebook data: mechanisms of consent and linkage Tate Liverpool’s Democracies: curatorial methodologies for exploring democracy An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys A brief reply to David Byrne Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1