伯利恒的奴隶制:北安普顿县摩拉维亚定居点的差异与冷漠

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Journal of Moravian History Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5325/jmorahist.23.2.0077
Scott Paul Gordon
{"title":"伯利恒的奴隶制:北安普顿县摩拉维亚定居点的差异与冷漠","authors":"Scott Paul Gordon","doi":"10.5325/jmorahist.23.2.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article offers a new history of slavery in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: how enslaved men and women were brought to Bethlehem, who owned these enslaved men and women, how some became free, and whether the lives of enslaved Moravians differed from those of free Moravians. The prevailing account states that the Moravian congregation itself purchased enslaved men and women soon after Bethlehem was settled to augment its labor force. But most Afro-Moravians got to Bethlehem, this article shows, through a haphazard process that the congregation did not manage: enslavers (Moravians elsewhere) sent men, women, and children to Bethlehem or brought them when they moved to the backcountry community. Moravian authorities claimed that there was “no difference” in Bethlehem between these enslaved people and White Moravians. The archive that the congregation produced tends to reinforce that view: church registers, membership catalogs, diaries, and memoirs are mostly silent, for instance, about individuals’ legal status. But amplifying voices that have been overlooked of enslaved and free Afro-Moravians, as well as exploring the neglected 1780 Register of enslaved persons in Northampton County, reveals that differences based on race shaped the lives of people of African descent in Bethlehem and Northampton County’s other Moravian communities.","PeriodicalId":40312,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Moravian History","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements\",\"authors\":\"Scott Paul Gordon\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/jmorahist.23.2.0077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article offers a new history of slavery in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: how enslaved men and women were brought to Bethlehem, who owned these enslaved men and women, how some became free, and whether the lives of enslaved Moravians differed from those of free Moravians. The prevailing account states that the Moravian congregation itself purchased enslaved men and women soon after Bethlehem was settled to augment its labor force. But most Afro-Moravians got to Bethlehem, this article shows, through a haphazard process that the congregation did not manage: enslavers (Moravians elsewhere) sent men, women, and children to Bethlehem or brought them when they moved to the backcountry community. Moravian authorities claimed that there was “no difference” in Bethlehem between these enslaved people and White Moravians. The archive that the congregation produced tends to reinforce that view: church registers, membership catalogs, diaries, and memoirs are mostly silent, for instance, about individuals’ legal status. But amplifying voices that have been overlooked of enslaved and free Afro-Moravians, as well as exploring the neglected 1780 Register of enslaved persons in Northampton County, reveals that differences based on race shaped the lives of people of African descent in Bethlehem and Northampton County’s other Moravian communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Moravian History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/jmorahist.23.2.0077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Moravian History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jmorahist.23.2.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提供了宾夕法尼亚州伯利恒奴隶制的新历史:被奴役的男女如何被带到伯利恒,谁拥有这些被奴役的男女,其中一些人如何获得自由,以及被奴役的摩拉维亚人的生活是否与自由的摩拉维亚人不同。普遍的说法是,摩拉维亚会众在伯利恒定居后不久就购买了被奴役的男女,以增加其劳动力。但这篇文章显示,大多数非裔摩拉维亚人是通过一个偶然的过程到达伯利恒的,这个过程是教会无法管理的:奴隶主(其他地方的摩拉维亚人)把男人、女人和孩子送到伯利恒,或者在他们搬到偏远地区的时候把他们带来。摩拉维亚当局声称,在伯利恒,这些被奴役的人和白人摩拉维亚人“没有区别”。教会提供的档案倾向于强化这种观点:例如,教会登记、会员目录、日记和回忆录大多对个人的法律地位保持沉默。但是,放大被奴役和自由的非裔摩拉维亚人的声音,以及探索被忽视的1780年北安普顿县被奴役者登记册,揭示了基于种族的差异塑造了伯利恒和北安普顿县其他摩拉维亚社区非洲人后裔的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
ABSTRACT This article offers a new history of slavery in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: how enslaved men and women were brought to Bethlehem, who owned these enslaved men and women, how some became free, and whether the lives of enslaved Moravians differed from those of free Moravians. The prevailing account states that the Moravian congregation itself purchased enslaved men and women soon after Bethlehem was settled to augment its labor force. But most Afro-Moravians got to Bethlehem, this article shows, through a haphazard process that the congregation did not manage: enslavers (Moravians elsewhere) sent men, women, and children to Bethlehem or brought them when they moved to the backcountry community. Moravian authorities claimed that there was “no difference” in Bethlehem between these enslaved people and White Moravians. The archive that the congregation produced tends to reinforce that view: church registers, membership catalogs, diaries, and memoirs are mostly silent, for instance, about individuals’ legal status. But amplifying voices that have been overlooked of enslaved and free Afro-Moravians, as well as exploring the neglected 1780 Register of enslaved persons in Northampton County, reveals that differences based on race shaped the lives of people of African descent in Bethlehem and Northampton County’s other Moravian communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Missionaries and Modernity: Education in the British Empire, 1830–1910 Babel of the Atlantic Peter Boehler’s Universalist Letter Spangenberg’s 1760 Letter about Slaveholding in St. Thomas and Bethlehem Slavery in Bethlehem: Difference and Indifference in Northampton County’s Moravian Settlements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1