萨摩亚援助范围内教育项目中信息和传播技术的多维设计--现实差距

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development Policy Review Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1111/dpr.12744
Masami Tsujita
{"title":"萨摩亚援助范围内教育项目中信息和传播技术的多维设计--现实差距","authors":"Masami Tsujita","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last few decades, Samoa has received much aid to enhance the use of information, communication, and technology (ICT) in education. Yet, the inequality gap in digital education between the Global North and South remains wide, including in Samoa. This warrants further studies on ICT in education projects in recipient countries.This study examines the gap between ICT project design and the reality lived by schoolteachers in Samoa.Empirical data were collected primarily through informal conversations with current and former teachers and ICT service providers. Their stories supported direct observation of ICT at schools garnered through working as a lecturer at an academic institution in Samoa.I use the concept of aidscape, which reflects the multidimensional nature of aid landscape, to explore the reality gaps across dimensions of the everyday life of teachers and examines how these gaps are interrelated at multiple levels.The reality of teachers shows interlinking challenges to the use of ICT at schools; challenges of accessing equipment, school culture, user perception, high staff turnover, and labour emigration. Enhancing the use of ICT by teachers requires material, technical, financial, sociocultural, and emotional support simultaneously from various actors of aid who operate on different scales.Other challenges, including the high cost of technology and devices, the lack of funding for long‐term projects, the lack of ICT experts in the country, and poor connectivity, also contribute to less‐than‐satisfactory results of some ICT in education.The way forward lies in stronger coordination among donors and more effective collaboration among different ministries of the recipient government to develop a combined project team dedicated to ICT in education. This team could work to untangle interlinked issues and tackle challenges one by one to find feasible solutions at grassroots, which could be incorporated into viable national policies.","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional design-reality gaps in ICT in education projects in the Samoan aidscape\",\"authors\":\"Masami Tsujita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.12744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last few decades, Samoa has received much aid to enhance the use of information, communication, and technology (ICT) in education. Yet, the inequality gap in digital education between the Global North and South remains wide, including in Samoa. This warrants further studies on ICT in education projects in recipient countries.This study examines the gap between ICT project design and the reality lived by schoolteachers in Samoa.Empirical data were collected primarily through informal conversations with current and former teachers and ICT service providers. Their stories supported direct observation of ICT at schools garnered through working as a lecturer at an academic institution in Samoa.I use the concept of aidscape, which reflects the multidimensional nature of aid landscape, to explore the reality gaps across dimensions of the everyday life of teachers and examines how these gaps are interrelated at multiple levels.The reality of teachers shows interlinking challenges to the use of ICT at schools; challenges of accessing equipment, school culture, user perception, high staff turnover, and labour emigration. Enhancing the use of ICT by teachers requires material, technical, financial, sociocultural, and emotional support simultaneously from various actors of aid who operate on different scales.Other challenges, including the high cost of technology and devices, the lack of funding for long‐term projects, the lack of ICT experts in the country, and poor connectivity, also contribute to less‐than‐satisfactory results of some ICT in education.The way forward lies in stronger coordination among donors and more effective collaboration among different ministries of the recipient government to develop a combined project team dedicated to ICT in education. This team could work to untangle interlinked issues and tackle challenges one by one to find feasible solutions at grassroots, which could be incorporated into viable national policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12744\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12744","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几十年里,萨摩亚得到了许多援助,以改善在教育中使用信息、通信和技术(ICT)。然而,全球北方和南方在数字教育方面的不平等差距仍然很大,包括在萨摩亚。这就需要进一步研究信息和通信技术在受援国教育项目中的应用。本研究探讨萨摩亚ICT项目设计与学校教师现实生活之间的差距。实证数据主要通过与现任和前任教师以及ICT服务提供商的非正式对话收集。她们的故事支持了在萨摩亚一所学术机构担任讲师期间对学校信息通信技术的直接观察。我使用援助景观的概念,它反映了援助景观的多维性,来探索教师日常生活中各个维度的现实差距,并研究这些差距如何在多个层面上相互关联。教师的现实情况表明,在学校使用信息通信技术面临着相互关联的挑战;获取设备的挑战、学校文化、用户感知、高员工流动率和劳动力移民。加强教师对信息通信技术的使用需要来自不同规模的各种援助行动者同时提供物质、技术、财政、社会文化和情感支持。其他挑战,包括技术和设备的高成本、长期项目缺乏资金、该国缺乏信息通信技术专家以及连通性差,也导致一些信息通信技术在教育中的效果不尽如人意。前进的道路在于捐助者之间更好地协调,以及受援国政府不同部委之间更有效地合作,以建立一个致力于教育中的信息通信技术的联合项目小组。这个团队可以解决相互关联的问题,一个接一个地解决挑战,在基层找到可行的解决方案,然后将其纳入可行的国家政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multidimensional design-reality gaps in ICT in education projects in the Samoan aidscape
During the last few decades, Samoa has received much aid to enhance the use of information, communication, and technology (ICT) in education. Yet, the inequality gap in digital education between the Global North and South remains wide, including in Samoa. This warrants further studies on ICT in education projects in recipient countries.This study examines the gap between ICT project design and the reality lived by schoolteachers in Samoa.Empirical data were collected primarily through informal conversations with current and former teachers and ICT service providers. Their stories supported direct observation of ICT at schools garnered through working as a lecturer at an academic institution in Samoa.I use the concept of aidscape, which reflects the multidimensional nature of aid landscape, to explore the reality gaps across dimensions of the everyday life of teachers and examines how these gaps are interrelated at multiple levels.The reality of teachers shows interlinking challenges to the use of ICT at schools; challenges of accessing equipment, school culture, user perception, high staff turnover, and labour emigration. Enhancing the use of ICT by teachers requires material, technical, financial, sociocultural, and emotional support simultaneously from various actors of aid who operate on different scales.Other challenges, including the high cost of technology and devices, the lack of funding for long‐term projects, the lack of ICT experts in the country, and poor connectivity, also contribute to less‐than‐satisfactory results of some ICT in education.The way forward lies in stronger coordination among donors and more effective collaboration among different ministries of the recipient government to develop a combined project team dedicated to ICT in education. This team could work to untangle interlinked issues and tackle challenges one by one to find feasible solutions at grassroots, which could be incorporated into viable national policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Assessing the success of National Human Rights Action Plans from a political economy perspective: The case of Chile Reshaping gender norms: Exploring the ripple effect of refugeeism on women's empowerment Does subsidizing seed help farmers? Nepal's rice seed subsidies Social sustainability discourse in cohesion policy: A critical review of Interreg Europe 2021–2027
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1