Craig HC, Alsaeed D, Norris S, Holian J, Kennedy C, Feldman A, CW le Roux
{"title":"患者对肥胖并发症治疗偏好的看法","authors":"Craig HC, Alsaeed D, Norris S, Holian J, Kennedy C, Feldman A, CW le Roux","doi":"10.1002/osp4.720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective Obesity and many of its comorbidities can be improved by nutritional therapy, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgical intervention. Relatively little is known about patients' preferences for the range of obesity treatments. The present study was undertaken to identify factors that may influence these preferences. By evaluating patient‐preferred treatment options and factors influencing patients, treatment adherence and efficacy may be improved. Our objective was to identify factors that influence patient preferences and subsequent choice of obesity treatment among those seeking treatment for obesity‐related complications. Methods Participatory action research, using purposeful sampling, was used to recruit 33 patients with obesity complications. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Sixteen males and 17 females aged 18–70 years with a BMI>35 kg/m 2 were recruited. Prior to the interview, participants watched a 60‐min video explaining nutritional therapies, pharmacotherapies, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data were collected in one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews using zoom or the telephone; reflective thematic analysis was used. Results Four themes emerged: 1) structural factors, 2) autonomy, 3) interaction with formal care, and 4) the emotional and physical consequences of obesity. 39% of participants preferred nutritional therapy with support from medical professionals. 27% chose bariatric surgery. 24% chose pharmacotherapy alone, while 6% chose pharmacotherapy combined with nutritional therapy, 3% of participants wanted no intervention. Conclusion The challenges can be addressed by increasing support for healthcare professionals toward enhancing both their knowledge and the health literacy of patients. Future research should focus on improving access to treatment pathways for patients as well as developing health literacy programs and educational programs for healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"63 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications\",\"authors\":\"Craig HC, Alsaeed D, Norris S, Holian J, Kennedy C, Feldman A, CW le Roux\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/osp4.720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective Obesity and many of its comorbidities can be improved by nutritional therapy, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgical intervention. Relatively little is known about patients' preferences for the range of obesity treatments. The present study was undertaken to identify factors that may influence these preferences. By evaluating patient‐preferred treatment options and factors influencing patients, treatment adherence and efficacy may be improved. Our objective was to identify factors that influence patient preferences and subsequent choice of obesity treatment among those seeking treatment for obesity‐related complications. Methods Participatory action research, using purposeful sampling, was used to recruit 33 patients with obesity complications. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Sixteen males and 17 females aged 18–70 years with a BMI>35 kg/m 2 were recruited. Prior to the interview, participants watched a 60‐min video explaining nutritional therapies, pharmacotherapies, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data were collected in one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews using zoom or the telephone; reflective thematic analysis was used. Results Four themes emerged: 1) structural factors, 2) autonomy, 3) interaction with formal care, and 4) the emotional and physical consequences of obesity. 39% of participants preferred nutritional therapy with support from medical professionals. 27% chose bariatric surgery. 24% chose pharmacotherapy alone, while 6% chose pharmacotherapy combined with nutritional therapy, 3% of participants wanted no intervention. Conclusion The challenges can be addressed by increasing support for healthcare professionals toward enhancing both their knowledge and the health literacy of patients. Future research should focus on improving access to treatment pathways for patients as well as developing health literacy programs and educational programs for healthcare professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"volume\":\"63 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Science & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient perspectives about treatment preferences for obesity with complications
Abstract Objective Obesity and many of its comorbidities can be improved by nutritional therapy, lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and surgical intervention. Relatively little is known about patients' preferences for the range of obesity treatments. The present study was undertaken to identify factors that may influence these preferences. By evaluating patient‐preferred treatment options and factors influencing patients, treatment adherence and efficacy may be improved. Our objective was to identify factors that influence patient preferences and subsequent choice of obesity treatment among those seeking treatment for obesity‐related complications. Methods Participatory action research, using purposeful sampling, was used to recruit 33 patients with obesity complications. Recruitment took place in specialist clinics for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. Sixteen males and 17 females aged 18–70 years with a BMI>35 kg/m 2 were recruited. Prior to the interview, participants watched a 60‐min video explaining nutritional therapies, pharmacotherapies, and surgical therapies in equipoise. Data were collected in one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews using zoom or the telephone; reflective thematic analysis was used. Results Four themes emerged: 1) structural factors, 2) autonomy, 3) interaction with formal care, and 4) the emotional and physical consequences of obesity. 39% of participants preferred nutritional therapy with support from medical professionals. 27% chose bariatric surgery. 24% chose pharmacotherapy alone, while 6% chose pharmacotherapy combined with nutritional therapy, 3% of participants wanted no intervention. Conclusion The challenges can be addressed by increasing support for healthcare professionals toward enhancing both their knowledge and the health literacy of patients. Future research should focus on improving access to treatment pathways for patients as well as developing health literacy programs and educational programs for healthcare professionals.