{"title":"编辑注释","authors":"Steve Ruddock","doi":"10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 6 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail One could pull at any number of threads in the gambling industry. When unraveled, a lot of these threads will be interconnected. Whether it's the sudden emphasis on responsible gambling policies and procedures, the expansion of regulated online gambling around the globe (although much of the focus has been on the U.S.), or the rethinking of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and how tribal gaming fits into the landscape.One of the most significant developments on the tribal gaming front is playing out in the U.S. legal system, as the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida scored a decisive victory at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found their 2022 compact legitimate.The case will be discussed at length in the September issue, and in this issue, we have the first part of an exclusive roundtable on the proposed changes by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) with some of the top minds in the areas of tribal gaming law. The wide-ranging discussion touched on many different areas, which explains why the entire conversation will take up space in two issues.Beyond the BIA rules and the West Flagler case, there are also tribal developments in California, where the ongoing dispute between the state's gaming tribes and commercial cardrooms over so-called player-banked games is being discussed in the legislature. The new bill would grant tribes a one-time exception to file suit against cardrooms they believe are violating tribal gaming exclusivity. Previous legal efforts by California tribes have been dismissed for lack of standing due to tribal sovereignty. This is a topic Gaming Law Review would like to cover in-depth. If you are interested in tackling this complex topic, please reach out to [email protected].FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 6Aug 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2023.271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 6: August 3, 2023PDF download","PeriodicalId":44210,"journal":{"name":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NOTES FROM THE EDITOR\",\"authors\":\"Steve Ruddock\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 6 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail One could pull at any number of threads in the gambling industry. When unraveled, a lot of these threads will be interconnected. Whether it's the sudden emphasis on responsible gambling policies and procedures, the expansion of regulated online gambling around the globe (although much of the focus has been on the U.S.), or the rethinking of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and how tribal gaming fits into the landscape.One of the most significant developments on the tribal gaming front is playing out in the U.S. legal system, as the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida scored a decisive victory at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found their 2022 compact legitimate.The case will be discussed at length in the September issue, and in this issue, we have the first part of an exclusive roundtable on the proposed changes by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) with some of the top minds in the areas of tribal gaming law. The wide-ranging discussion touched on many different areas, which explains why the entire conversation will take up space in two issues.Beyond the BIA rules and the West Flagler case, there are also tribal developments in California, where the ongoing dispute between the state's gaming tribes and commercial cardrooms over so-called player-banked games is being discussed in the legislature. The new bill would grant tribes a one-time exception to file suit against cardrooms they believe are violating tribal gaming exclusivity. Previous legal efforts by California tribes have been dismissed for lack of standing due to tribal sovereignty. This is a topic Gaming Law Review would like to cover in-depth. If you are interested in tackling this complex topic, please reach out to [email protected].FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 6Aug 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2023.271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 6: August 3, 2023PDF download\",\"PeriodicalId\":44210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaming Law Review-Economics Regulation Compliance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.editorial","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
博彩法律评论卷。27, No. 6编辑笔记免费访问编辑笔记史蒂夫·鲁多克史蒂夫·鲁多克搜索本文作者的更多论文发表在线:2023年8月3日https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB权限和引文spermissionsdownload引文strack引文添加到收藏返回出版ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail一个人可以拉在任何数量的线程在赌博行业。当这些线索被解开时,许多线索将相互连接。无论是突然强调负责任的赌博政策和程序,受监管的在线赌博在全球范围内的扩张(尽管大部分焦点都集中在美国),还是重新思考印度游戏监管法案(IGRA)以及部落游戏如何适应这一景观。部落游戏领域最重要的发展之一正在美国法律体系中发挥作用,因为塞米诺尔部落和佛罗里达州在华盛顿特区巡回上诉法院取得了决定性的胜利,该法院裁定他们的2022年契约合法。这个案例将在9月刊上详细讨论,在这一期中,我们有一个独家圆桌会议的第一部分,讨论印第安事务局(BIA)与部落博彩法领域的一些顶尖人士提出的改革建议。这次广泛的讨论涉及了许多不同的领域,这就解释了为什么整个对话将在两个问题上占据篇幅。除了BIA规则和西弗拉格勒案例,加州也有部落发展,该州游戏部落和商业游戏室之间关于所谓玩家银行游戏的持续争议正在立法机构讨论中。新法案将给予部落一次例外,可以对他们认为侵犯部落游戏排他性的游戏室提起诉讼。加州部落之前的法律努力由于部落主权的原因而被驳回。这是《Gaming Law Review》想要深入探讨的话题。如果你对这个复杂的话题感兴趣,请联系[email protected]。信息版权所有2023,Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.,出版商本文引用:Steve Ruddock。编辑注释。博彩法律评论。2023.8月271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished Volume: 27 Issue 6: 2023年8月3日pdf下载
Gaming Law ReviewVol. 27, No. 6 Notes From the EditorFree AccessNOTES FROM THE EDITORSteve RuddockSteve RuddockSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:3 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialAboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail One could pull at any number of threads in the gambling industry. When unraveled, a lot of these threads will be interconnected. Whether it's the sudden emphasis on responsible gambling policies and procedures, the expansion of regulated online gambling around the globe (although much of the focus has been on the U.S.), or the rethinking of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and how tribal gaming fits into the landscape.One of the most significant developments on the tribal gaming front is playing out in the U.S. legal system, as the Seminole Tribe and the state of Florida scored a decisive victory at the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found their 2022 compact legitimate.The case will be discussed at length in the September issue, and in this issue, we have the first part of an exclusive roundtable on the proposed changes by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) with some of the top minds in the areas of tribal gaming law. The wide-ranging discussion touched on many different areas, which explains why the entire conversation will take up space in two issues.Beyond the BIA rules and the West Flagler case, there are also tribal developments in California, where the ongoing dispute between the state's gaming tribes and commercial cardrooms over so-called player-banked games is being discussed in the legislature. The new bill would grant tribes a one-time exception to file suit against cardrooms they believe are violating tribal gaming exclusivity. Previous legal efforts by California tribes have been dismissed for lack of standing due to tribal sovereignty. This is a topic Gaming Law Review would like to cover in-depth. If you are interested in tackling this complex topic, please reach out to [email protected].FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 27Issue 6Aug 2023 InformationCopyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishersTo cite this article:Steve Ruddock.NOTES FROM THE EDITOR.Gaming Law Review.Aug 2023.271-271.http://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2023.29086.EditorialPublished in Volume: 27 Issue 6: August 3, 2023PDF download