替代混凝土的可持续性——能量和生命周期分析

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1680/jensu.23.00044
Kavya A Nair, K B Anand
{"title":"替代混凝土的可持续性——能量和生命周期分析","authors":"Kavya A Nair, K B Anand","doi":"10.1680/jensu.23.00044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction industry contributes the highest CO 2 emissions, in which concrete production is one of the key components. Extracting and transporting raw materials like limestone and aggregates contribute to habitat destruction and pollution. This study deals with the relative assessment of a group of commonly used concretes in varied strength levels using emergy analysis and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Six types of concrete are considered for evaluation: normal, binary blended, ternary blended, quaternary blended, alkali activated, and recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Emergy analysis considers different qualities and quantities of inputs, providing insights on the resource-based impacts through emergy indicators. LCA, conducted using SimaPro software, evaluates the environmental impacts of concrete production using midpoint and endpoint indicators. From emergy analysis it is inferred that of concrete with alternative materials like fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, and recycled aggregate exhibited better results in terms of emergy indicators. RAC showed the highest value of emergy sustainability index in all strength ranges. In LCA, impacts were seen higher for normal concrete, followed by RAC. To obtain a more inclusive result, an emergy-LCA integrated index (IELI) is proposed. Results from this index aids in improved decision-making regarding the sustainability of the system considered.","PeriodicalId":49671,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability of alternative concretes – emergy and life cycle analysis\",\"authors\":\"Kavya A Nair, K B Anand\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jensu.23.00044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Construction industry contributes the highest CO 2 emissions, in which concrete production is one of the key components. Extracting and transporting raw materials like limestone and aggregates contribute to habitat destruction and pollution. This study deals with the relative assessment of a group of commonly used concretes in varied strength levels using emergy analysis and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Six types of concrete are considered for evaluation: normal, binary blended, ternary blended, quaternary blended, alkali activated, and recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Emergy analysis considers different qualities and quantities of inputs, providing insights on the resource-based impacts through emergy indicators. LCA, conducted using SimaPro software, evaluates the environmental impacts of concrete production using midpoint and endpoint indicators. From emergy analysis it is inferred that of concrete with alternative materials like fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, and recycled aggregate exhibited better results in terms of emergy indicators. RAC showed the highest value of emergy sustainability index in all strength ranges. In LCA, impacts were seen higher for normal concrete, followed by RAC. To obtain a more inclusive result, an emergy-LCA integrated index (IELI) is proposed. Results from this index aids in improved decision-making regarding the sustainability of the system considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00044\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jensu.23.00044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建筑业贡献了最高的二氧化碳排放量,其中混凝土生产是关键组成部分之一。开采和运输石灰石和骨料等原材料会对栖息地造成破坏和污染。本研究使用能量分析和生命周期评估(LCA)对一组不同强度水平的常用混凝土进行了相对评估。六种类型的混凝土被考虑用于评估:普通,二元混合,三元混合,四元混合,碱活化和再生骨料混凝土(RAC)。能值分析考虑不同质量和数量的投入,通过能值指标提供基于资源的影响的见解。使用SimaPro软件进行的LCA使用中点和端点指标评估混凝土生产对环境的影响。从能值分析可知,粉煤灰、硅灰、GGBS、再生骨料等替代材料的混凝土在能值指标上表现出更好的效果。RAC在各强度范围内能量持续指数最高。在LCA中,普通混凝土的影响较大,其次是RAC。为了获得更具包容性的结果,提出了一种能量- lca综合指数(IELI)。该指数的结果有助于改进所考虑的系统可持续性方面的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability of alternative concretes – emergy and life cycle analysis
Construction industry contributes the highest CO 2 emissions, in which concrete production is one of the key components. Extracting and transporting raw materials like limestone and aggregates contribute to habitat destruction and pollution. This study deals with the relative assessment of a group of commonly used concretes in varied strength levels using emergy analysis and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Six types of concrete are considered for evaluation: normal, binary blended, ternary blended, quaternary blended, alkali activated, and recycled aggregate concrete (RAC). Emergy analysis considers different qualities and quantities of inputs, providing insights on the resource-based impacts through emergy indicators. LCA, conducted using SimaPro software, evaluates the environmental impacts of concrete production using midpoint and endpoint indicators. From emergy analysis it is inferred that of concrete with alternative materials like fly ash, silica fume, GGBS, and recycled aggregate exhibited better results in terms of emergy indicators. RAC showed the highest value of emergy sustainability index in all strength ranges. In LCA, impacts were seen higher for normal concrete, followed by RAC. To obtain a more inclusive result, an emergy-LCA integrated index (IELI) is proposed. Results from this index aids in improved decision-making regarding the sustainability of the system considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Engineering Sustainability provides a forum for sharing the latest thinking from research and practice, and increasingly is presenting the ''how to'' of engineering a resilient future. The journal features refereed papers and shorter articles relating to the pursuit and implementation of sustainability principles through engineering planning, design and application. The tensions between and integration of social, economic and environmental considerations within such schemes are of particular relevance. Methodologies for assessing sustainability, policy issues, education and corporate responsibility will also be included. The aims will be met primarily by providing papers and briefing notes (including case histories and best practice guidance) of use to decision-makers, practitioners, researchers and students.
期刊最新文献
Thermal conductivity of an external wall with simulated smart Aerogel insulation system Life cycle based considerations in design of driven piles in sand Establishing preference ranking for town water supply in remote areas: case study in Taiwan Performance evaluation of prefabricated retaining wall systems based on centrifuge tests Urban microclimate analysis: residential block morphology impact on outdoor thermal comfort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1