采用不同过渡过程模型分析水下岩塞爆破系统隧道内不同流型下的压力波动

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.2166/aqua.2023.192
Xiaoying Zhang, Yisong Wang, Tingyu Xu, Jian Zhang
{"title":"采用不同过渡过程模型分析水下岩塞爆破系统隧道内不同流型下的压力波动","authors":"Xiaoying Zhang, Yisong Wang, Tingyu Xu, Jian Zhang","doi":"10.2166/aqua.2023.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.","PeriodicalId":34693,"journal":{"name":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of pressure surges under various flow patterns in the tunnel of an underwater rock plug blasting system using different transition process models\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoying Zhang, Yisong Wang, Tingyu Xu, Jian Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/aqua.2023.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AQUA-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

爆破瞬间压力波动严重威胁着管道结构和其他建筑物的安全。本文基于一维瞬态流动理论,考虑到水和空气的实际流动特性,建立了水力过渡过程和水-气两相流动的数值模拟模型。在有压力流和无压力流两种不同条件下,研究了爆破系统的水力特性和爆破参数。通过实际爆破样机的观测参数,验证了数学模型的准确性。压力爆破的最大压力是静水压力的2.55倍。无压爆破的最大压力是静水压力的1.77倍。压力爆破的冲击比非压力爆破大2.17倍。喷涌和溢流高度的实际数据与模拟数据之间的差异在9%到14%之间。该模型可为爆破工程对水下岩塞爆破系统的冲击压力、溢流时间、溢流等水力特性的模拟计算提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of pressure surges under various flow patterns in the tunnel of an underwater rock plug blasting system using different transition process models
Abstract The pressure surge at the moment of blasting seriously threatens the safety of pipeline structures and other buildings. This article established two numerical simulation models of the hydraulic transition process and water–air two-phase flow based on the one-dimensional transient flow theory and considering the actual flow characteristics of water and air. The hydraulic characteristics and blasting parameters of the blasting system were studied under two different conditions of the tunnel with and without the pressure flow. The observed parameters of an actual blasting engineering prototype verified the accuracy of the mathematical model. The maximum pressure of pressure blasting was 2.55 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. The maximum pressure of non-pressure blasting was 1.77 times as high as hydrostatic pressure. Pressure blasting impact was 2.17 times greater than nonpressure blasting. Discrepancies between actual and simulated data for gushing and overflow heights ranged from 9 to 14%. The model can provide a reference for blasting engineering on the simulation calculation of hydraulic characteristics such as impact pressure, overflow time, and overflow of the underwater rock plug blasting system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biogas production from water lilies, food waste, and sludge: substrate characterization and process performance How suitable is the gold-labelling method for the quantification of nanoplastics in natural water? Corrigendum: AQUA – Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society 72 (7), 1115–1129: Application of system dynamics model for reservoir performance under future climatic scenarios in Gelevard Dam, Iran, Ali Babolhakami, Mohammad Ali Gholami Sefidkouhi and Alireza Emadi, https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.193 Exploring the rise of AI-based smart water management systems Unraveling air–water two-phase flow patterns in water pipelines based on multiple signals and convolutional neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1