工作场所的优势使用:一项荟萃分析

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Psychology in Africa Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274
Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren
{"title":"工作场所的优势使用:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren","doi":"10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance","PeriodicalId":46959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strengths use in the workplace: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yuxiang Luan, Guolong Zhao, Liang Xu, Bo Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance\",\"PeriodicalId\":46959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychology in Africa\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychology in Africa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2246274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本荟萃分析旨在利用跨时间与时间滞后的研究设计,阐明感知组织支持与核心自我评价、优势使用和任务绩效结果之间的关系。本研究采用随机效应模型,综合了23项独立研究的44个效应量(包括8 313个样本)。结果表明,优势使用与核心自我评价(CSE) (ρ = 0.40)正相关,与优势使用的感知组织支持(POSSU) (ρ = 0.47)、任务绩效(ρ = 0.45)、组织公民行为(OCB) (ρ = 0.37)、积极情感(ρ = 0.51)、工作投入(ρ = 0.53)和自我效能感(ρ = 0)正相关。组织设计(跨时间与时滞)对兴趣关系无显著调节作用。研究结果表明,利用员工的优势对有效的人力资源管理和员工的职业发展至关重要。关键词:优势使用meta分析前因结果工作场所任务绩效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strengths use in the workplace: A meta-analysis
AbstractThis meta-analysis aimed to clarify the relationship between perceived organisational support and core self-evaluations and strengths use and task performance outcomes utilising a cross-temporal versus time-lagged research design. Drawing on the random effects model, this study combined 44 effect sizes from 23 independent studies (including 8 313 samples). The results indicated that strengths use is positively related to core self-evaluations (CSE) (ρ = 0.40) and perceived organisational support for strengths use (POSSU) (ρ = 0.47), task performance (ρ = 0.45), organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB) (ρ = 0.37), positive affect (ρ = 0.51), work engagement (ρ = 0.53), and self-efficacy (ρ = 0) organisational design (cross-temporal versus time-lagged) does not significantly moderate the relationships of interest. The findings imply that utilising the strengths of employees is essential for effective human resource management and employees’ career development.Keywords: strengths usemeta-analysisantecedentsoutcomesworkplacetask performance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychology in Africa
Journal of Psychology in Africa PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Findings from psychological research in Africa and related regions needs a forum for better dissemination and utilisation in the context of development. Special emphasis is placed on the consideration of African, African-American, Asian, Caribbean, and Hispanic-Latino realities and problems. Contributions should attempt a synthesis of emic and etic methodologies and applications. The Journal of Psychology in Africa includes original articles, review articles, book reviews, commentaries, special issues, case analyses, reports and announcements.
期刊最新文献
Humble leadership and follower strengths use: Leader-member exchange as a mediator and role overload as a moderator Interpersonal sensitivity, smartphone addiction, connectedness to nature and life satisfaction among college students: A moderated mediation model The “double-edged sword” effect of social media usage on postgraduate student creativity Father’s parenting attitude and teacher-child relationships: Mediating role of children’s self-regulation ability Social support and self-concept clarity as mediators between college students’ passive social network site use and loneliness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1