保障长者在护理院享有自由的权利

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Human Rights Law Review Pub Date : 2023-03-10 DOI:10.1093/hrlr/ngad005
Alison Kesby
{"title":"保障长者在护理院享有自由的权利","authors":"Alison Kesby","doi":"10.1093/hrlr/ngad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the enjoyment of the right to liberty of residents of aged care homes, with a particular focus on those living with cognitive disability (most notably, dementia), and the tension between upholding a person’s autonomy and protecting them and others from harm. The analysis approaches this potential tension from two perspectives: firstly, by examining and evaluating different legal conceptions of the right to liberty of the person, and secondly, by examining the conditions and related rights, which enable the enjoyment of the right to liberty by aged care residents living with cognitive disability, including the right to autonomy and the right to long-term quality care. It is argued that a relational approach to autonomy is required, which places the enjoyment of the right to liberty within the broader context of an autonomy-enabling environment. Interrogating what we mean by ‘autonomy’ and ‘care’ may facilitate the enjoyment of the right to liberty for those most vulnerable in residential care.","PeriodicalId":46556,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling the Right to Liberty of the Person in Aged Care Homes\",\"authors\":\"Alison Kesby\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/hrlr/ngad005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the enjoyment of the right to liberty of residents of aged care homes, with a particular focus on those living with cognitive disability (most notably, dementia), and the tension between upholding a person’s autonomy and protecting them and others from harm. The analysis approaches this potential tension from two perspectives: firstly, by examining and evaluating different legal conceptions of the right to liberty of the person, and secondly, by examining the conditions and related rights, which enable the enjoyment of the right to liberty by aged care residents living with cognitive disability, including the right to autonomy and the right to long-term quality care. It is argued that a relational approach to autonomy is required, which places the enjoyment of the right to liberty within the broader context of an autonomy-enabling environment. Interrogating what we mean by ‘autonomy’ and ‘care’ may facilitate the enjoyment of the right to liberty for those most vulnerable in residential care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Rights Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Rights Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了老年护理院居民享有自由权的情况,特别关注那些患有认知障碍(最明显的是痴呆症)的人,以及维护个人自主权与保护他们和他人免受伤害之间的紧张关系。本文从两个角度分析了这种潜在的张力:一是对不同的人身自由权法律概念进行考察和评价,二是对认知残疾老年人享有人身自由权的条件和相关权利进行考察,包括自主权和长期优质护理权。有人认为,需要对自治采取一种关系的办法,将享有自由的权利置于有利于自治的环境的更广泛的范围内。询问我们所说的“自主”和“照顾”的含义可能有助于那些在住宿照顾中最脆弱的人享受自由权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enabling the Right to Liberty of the Person in Aged Care Homes
Abstract This article examines the enjoyment of the right to liberty of residents of aged care homes, with a particular focus on those living with cognitive disability (most notably, dementia), and the tension between upholding a person’s autonomy and protecting them and others from harm. The analysis approaches this potential tension from two perspectives: firstly, by examining and evaluating different legal conceptions of the right to liberty of the person, and secondly, by examining the conditions and related rights, which enable the enjoyment of the right to liberty by aged care residents living with cognitive disability, including the right to autonomy and the right to long-term quality care. It is argued that a relational approach to autonomy is required, which places the enjoyment of the right to liberty within the broader context of an autonomy-enabling environment. Interrogating what we mean by ‘autonomy’ and ‘care’ may facilitate the enjoyment of the right to liberty for those most vulnerable in residential care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Launched in 2001, Human Rights Law Review seeks to promote awareness, knowledge, and discussion on matters of human rights law and policy. While academic in focus, the Review is also of interest to the wider human rights community, including those in governmental, inter-governmental and non-governmental spheres, concerned with law, policy, and fieldwork. The Review publishes critical articles that consider human rights in their various contexts, from global to national levels, book reviews, and a section dedicated to analysis of recent jurisprudence and practice of the UN and regional human rights systems.
期刊最新文献
The Discursive Evolution of Human Rights Law: Empirical Insights from a Computational Analysis of 180,000 UN Recommendations The ECHR and the Positive Obligation to Criminalise Domestic Psychological Violence Glorification of Terrorist Violence at the European Court of Human Rights The Human Right to Land: A Peasant Struggle in the Human Rights System A Research Agenda for Human Rights and the Environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1