妇女,奴隶制和档案:奴隶制研究的创新和当代联系

Srividhya Swaminathan
{"title":"妇女,奴隶制和档案:奴隶制研究的创新和当代联系","authors":"Srividhya Swaminathan","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Women, Slavery, and the Archive: Innovations in Slavery Studies and Contemporary Connections” Early scholarship on slavery, abolition, and the British empire largely ignored the contribution of women of any race to the African Institution. British women who participated in boycotts, produced literary texts against African enslavement, and did the legwork of circulating petitions were relegated to footnotes until well into the twentieth century when women scholars began to create space in the canon for the unrecognized or under-recognized women writers. These new avenues of research evolved through decades to become more inclusive, more critical, and more ground-breaking in bringing the past into the present. I identify four important shifts in our understanding of British enslavement and abolition over the long eighteenth century: 1. recognition of (white) women’s work in the abolitionist campaigns; 2. recognition of the labor of enslaved women and their contributions to resistance; 3. recognition of women’s involvement in supporting as well as resisting slavery; 4. recognition of the erasure of people, and the violence of the archive that only validates recorded experiences. Recovering these various kinds of erasures has opened possibilities for new methods of analysis. The legacy of this work not only opened slavery studies to new methodologies of gender and intersectional analyses, but it also opened the archive to productive critique. The new avenues for slavery studies recovers the voices of silenced women and empowers scholar who wish to challenge established narratives. By reviewing the scholarly legacy of transatlantic slavery studies, we can also better appreciate the influence on the immediate present. Contemporary work on Black Lives Matter (abolition), 1619 Project , and the attempts to ban critical race theory address the importance of the transitions in scholarship and how their legacies can reshape the future.","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women, Slavery, and the Archive: Innovations in Slavery Studies and Contemporary Connections\",\"authors\":\"Srividhya Swaminathan\",\"doi\":\"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Women, Slavery, and the Archive: Innovations in Slavery Studies and Contemporary Connections” Early scholarship on slavery, abolition, and the British empire largely ignored the contribution of women of any race to the African Institution. British women who participated in boycotts, produced literary texts against African enslavement, and did the legwork of circulating petitions were relegated to footnotes until well into the twentieth century when women scholars began to create space in the canon for the unrecognized or under-recognized women writers. These new avenues of research evolved through decades to become more inclusive, more critical, and more ground-breaking in bringing the past into the present. I identify four important shifts in our understanding of British enslavement and abolition over the long eighteenth century: 1. recognition of (white) women’s work in the abolitionist campaigns; 2. recognition of the labor of enslaved women and their contributions to resistance; 3. recognition of women’s involvement in supporting as well as resisting slavery; 4. recognition of the erasure of people, and the violence of the archive that only validates recorded experiences. Recovering these various kinds of erasures has opened possibilities for new methods of analysis. The legacy of this work not only opened slavery studies to new methodologies of gender and intersectional analyses, but it also opened the archive to productive critique. The new avenues for slavery studies recovers the voices of silenced women and empowers scholar who wish to challenge established narratives. By reviewing the scholarly legacy of transatlantic slavery studies, we can also better appreciate the influence on the immediate present. Contemporary work on Black Lives Matter (abolition), 1619 Project , and the attempts to ban critical race theory address the importance of the transitions in scholarship and how their legacies can reshape the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“妇女、奴隶制和档案:奴隶制研究的创新和当代联系”早期关于奴隶制、废奴和大英帝国的学术研究在很大程度上忽视了任何种族的妇女对非洲制度的贡献。参与抵制运动、撰写反对非洲奴隶制度的文学作品、为散发请愿书做跑腿工作的英国女性被贬为注脚,直到20世纪,女性学者开始在经典中为未被认可或未被认可的女性作家创造空间。这些新的研究途径经过几十年的发展,在将过去带入现在方面变得更具包容性、更具批判性和更具开创性。我认为,在漫长的18世纪,我们对英国奴隶制和奴隶制废除的理解发生了四个重要转变:承认(白人)妇女在废奴运动中的工作;2. 承认被奴役妇女的劳动和她们为抵抗所作的贡献;3.承认妇女参与支持和抵制奴隶制;4. 承认对人的抹去,以及档案的暴力,只会证实记录下来的经历。恢复这些不同类型的擦除为新的分析方法提供了可能性。这项工作的遗产不仅为奴隶制研究打开了性别和交叉分析的新方法,而且也为富有成效的批评打开了档案。奴隶制研究的新途径恢复了沉默妇女的声音,并赋予了希望挑战既定叙述的学者权力。通过回顾跨大西洋奴隶制研究的学术遗产,我们也可以更好地理解对当前的影响。当代关于“黑人的命也重要”(废除)、“1619计划”(1619 Project)以及试图禁止批判性种族理论的工作,都强调了学术转型的重要性,以及他们的遗产如何重塑未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Women, Slavery, and the Archive: Innovations in Slavery Studies and Contemporary Connections
“Women, Slavery, and the Archive: Innovations in Slavery Studies and Contemporary Connections” Early scholarship on slavery, abolition, and the British empire largely ignored the contribution of women of any race to the African Institution. British women who participated in boycotts, produced literary texts against African enslavement, and did the legwork of circulating petitions were relegated to footnotes until well into the twentieth century when women scholars began to create space in the canon for the unrecognized or under-recognized women writers. These new avenues of research evolved through decades to become more inclusive, more critical, and more ground-breaking in bringing the past into the present. I identify four important shifts in our understanding of British enslavement and abolition over the long eighteenth century: 1. recognition of (white) women’s work in the abolitionist campaigns; 2. recognition of the labor of enslaved women and their contributions to resistance; 3. recognition of women’s involvement in supporting as well as resisting slavery; 4. recognition of the erasure of people, and the violence of the archive that only validates recorded experiences. Recovering these various kinds of erasures has opened possibilities for new methods of analysis. The legacy of this work not only opened slavery studies to new methodologies of gender and intersectional analyses, but it also opened the archive to productive critique. The new avenues for slavery studies recovers the voices of silenced women and empowers scholar who wish to challenge established narratives. By reviewing the scholarly legacy of transatlantic slavery studies, we can also better appreciate the influence on the immediate present. Contemporary work on Black Lives Matter (abolition), 1619 Project , and the attempts to ban critical race theory address the importance of the transitions in scholarship and how their legacies can reshape the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1