情绪干扰时脑电皮层的脸和词源作为干扰源

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.25259/ijpp_430_2022
Tanaya Batabyal, Suriya Prakash Muthukrishnan, Prashant Tayade, Ratna Sharma, Simran Kaur
{"title":"情绪干扰时脑电皮层的脸和词源作为干扰源","authors":"Tanaya Batabyal, Suriya Prakash Muthukrishnan, Prashant Tayade, Ratna Sharma, Simran Kaur","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_430_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Faces and words bearing emotional valence are commonly encountered affective stimuli by humans. It is known that emotional distractors interfere with the task goal and disrupt the cognitive performance. However, the differential cortical sources involved as neural substrates, to process emotional distractors, while affecting performance during the presence of another emotional stimuli, (emotional interference) is still unexplored. Materials and Methods: Emotional interference was studied in 20 healthy adults (25.15 ± 2.978) while performing face-word interference (FwI) and Word-face interference (WfI) tasks, wherein words with emotions and faces were distractors and 128 channel electroencephalogram was acquired simultaneously. Further, standardised low-resolution electromagnetic tomography-based source analysis was done to study the differences in the cortical activity between the tasks across 66 gyri. Results: Higher reaction time (RT) and lower accuracy percentage were seen for categorising face in presence of word (FwI) versus word in presence of face (WfI) ( P < 0.001). We observed no difference in RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent FWI trials as compared to congruent FWI trials. In addition, we observed higher RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent WFI trials as compared to congruent WFI trials. Source analysis revealed higher cortical activity across 60 gyri and significantly lower cortical activity across three gyri during performance of FwI compared to WfI task ( P < 0.05/66). Activation of areas associated with saliency, conflict and goal directed behaviour exhibited consistently higher activity in FwI trials compared to WfI trials indicating the robustness of face processing and the hierarchical interplay of neural substrates in conditions of cognitive control. Conclusion: Cortical processing of face emerged as more potent distractor compared to an emotional word during emotional interference task.","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EEG cortical sources of face and word as distractors during emotional interference\",\"authors\":\"Tanaya Batabyal, Suriya Prakash Muthukrishnan, Prashant Tayade, Ratna Sharma, Simran Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijpp_430_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Faces and words bearing emotional valence are commonly encountered affective stimuli by humans. It is known that emotional distractors interfere with the task goal and disrupt the cognitive performance. However, the differential cortical sources involved as neural substrates, to process emotional distractors, while affecting performance during the presence of another emotional stimuli, (emotional interference) is still unexplored. Materials and Methods: Emotional interference was studied in 20 healthy adults (25.15 ± 2.978) while performing face-word interference (FwI) and Word-face interference (WfI) tasks, wherein words with emotions and faces were distractors and 128 channel electroencephalogram was acquired simultaneously. Further, standardised low-resolution electromagnetic tomography-based source analysis was done to study the differences in the cortical activity between the tasks across 66 gyri. Results: Higher reaction time (RT) and lower accuracy percentage were seen for categorising face in presence of word (FwI) versus word in presence of face (WfI) ( P < 0.001). We observed no difference in RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent FWI trials as compared to congruent FWI trials. In addition, we observed higher RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent WFI trials as compared to congruent WFI trials. Source analysis revealed higher cortical activity across 60 gyri and significantly lower cortical activity across three gyri during performance of FwI compared to WfI task ( P < 0.05/66). Activation of areas associated with saliency, conflict and goal directed behaviour exhibited consistently higher activity in FwI trials compared to WfI trials indicating the robustness of face processing and the hierarchical interplay of neural substrates in conditions of cognitive control. Conclusion: Cortical processing of face emerged as more potent distractor compared to an emotional word during emotional interference task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_430_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_430_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:带有情感效价的面孔和言语是人类经常遇到的情感刺激。众所周知,情绪干扰因素会干扰任务目标,破坏认知表现。然而,在另一种情绪刺激(情绪干扰)存在时,作为神经基质处理情绪干扰物同时影响表现的不同皮层源仍未被探索。材料与方法:选取20例(25.15±2.978)健康成人(25.15±2.978)进行面孔干扰(FwI)和文字-面孔干扰(WfI)任务,其中带有情绪和面孔的单词作为干扰物,同时获取128通道脑电图。此外,采用标准化的低分辨率电磁层析成像进行源分析,研究66个脑回任务之间皮层活动的差异。结果:与单词存在面孔(WfI)相比,单词存在面孔(FwI)对面孔进行分类的反应时间(RT)更长,准确率更低(P <0.001)。我们观察到不一致的FWI试验与一致的FWI试验相比,在RT和较低的准确率百分比上没有差异。此外,我们观察到与一致的WFI试验相比,不一致的WFI试验的RT更高,准确率更低。来源分析显示,与WfI任务相比,在执行FwI任务时,60个脑回的皮质活动较高,而3个脑回的皮质活动显著较低(P <0.05/66)。与WfI试验相比,FwI试验中与显著性、冲突和目标导向行为相关的区域的激活始终表现出更高的活性,这表明在认知控制条件下,面部加工的稳健性和神经基质的分层相互作用。结论:在情绪干扰任务中,面部皮层加工比情绪性词汇加工具有更强的干扰作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EEG cortical sources of face and word as distractors during emotional interference
Objectives: Faces and words bearing emotional valence are commonly encountered affective stimuli by humans. It is known that emotional distractors interfere with the task goal and disrupt the cognitive performance. However, the differential cortical sources involved as neural substrates, to process emotional distractors, while affecting performance during the presence of another emotional stimuli, (emotional interference) is still unexplored. Materials and Methods: Emotional interference was studied in 20 healthy adults (25.15 ± 2.978) while performing face-word interference (FwI) and Word-face interference (WfI) tasks, wherein words with emotions and faces were distractors and 128 channel electroencephalogram was acquired simultaneously. Further, standardised low-resolution electromagnetic tomography-based source analysis was done to study the differences in the cortical activity between the tasks across 66 gyri. Results: Higher reaction time (RT) and lower accuracy percentage were seen for categorising face in presence of word (FwI) versus word in presence of face (WfI) ( P < 0.001). We observed no difference in RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent FWI trials as compared to congruent FWI trials. In addition, we observed higher RT and lower accuracy percentage between incongruent WFI trials as compared to congruent WFI trials. Source analysis revealed higher cortical activity across 60 gyri and significantly lower cortical activity across three gyri during performance of FwI compared to WfI task ( P < 0.05/66). Activation of areas associated with saliency, conflict and goal directed behaviour exhibited consistently higher activity in FwI trials compared to WfI trials indicating the robustness of face processing and the hierarchical interplay of neural substrates in conditions of cognitive control. Conclusion: Cortical processing of face emerged as more potent distractor compared to an emotional word during emotional interference task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction programme for substance abuse patients in deaddiction centre Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study Oesophageal pressure topographic metrics in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An Indian perspective Erratum: Breath characteristics in four volitional yoga breathing practices Deep brain stimulation for the heterogeneous pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1