医学及相关课程教师在线教学与传统教学的比较:一项混合方法研究

Q4 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.25259/ijpp_146_2022
Nalini YC, Jeneth Berlin Raj, Devi R. Nithiya, Balachandra Adkoli, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda
{"title":"医学及相关课程教师在线教学与传统教学的比较:一项混合方法研究","authors":"Nalini YC, Jeneth Berlin Raj, Devi R. Nithiya, Balachandra Adkoli, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda","doi":"10.25259/ijpp_146_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Most teachers have minimal experience with online teaching since most of their learning and teaching years have been spent in a traditional face-to-face classroom. So how do instructors prepare themselves to teach online? What are their expectations of this new learning environment for the first time? The nature of faculty preparation and duration of experience affecting the performance between faculty will vary considerably, and support provided for online teaching also vary over a period of time. The objectives of this study were to obtain/ collect the perception of medical and allied course faculty employed at Deemed to be University, Pondicherry, to online teaching compared to traditional teaching. Materials and Methods: The online questionnaire and informed consent were mailed to all the faculty, and they were instructed to rate on a five-point numerically coded Likert scale (Always = 5, Frequently = 4, Sometimes = 3, Seldom = 2 and Never = 1) their satisfaction level to an online lecture class. Preliminary details, such as name, age, gender, department, college and post P.G experience, were obtained. Based on the scoring, inferential analysis was done. The online discussion session was done amongst selective participants, and a thematic analysis of the same was done. Results: A total of 119 participants responded to the questionnaire. An unpaired t -test was applied, and a significant difference ( P ≤ 0.05) was observed in the 17 questions in the study population between online and traditional lectures. Conclusion: Faculty were overall not satisfied with online lecture classes as they had trouble providing set induction and adequate closure, enabling pupil participation during lecture presentation and time management compared to traditional/conventional lecture classes. Faculty feel that online teaching can continue in the post-pandemic era for a few selectively chosen appropriate topics, and the class duration should be short. A blended approach to learning can be adopted in the future.","PeriodicalId":13367,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reflection and perception of medical and allied courses faculty to online teaching compared to traditional teaching: A mixed-method study\",\"authors\":\"Nalini YC, Jeneth Berlin Raj, Devi R. Nithiya, Balachandra Adkoli, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/ijpp_146_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Most teachers have minimal experience with online teaching since most of their learning and teaching years have been spent in a traditional face-to-face classroom. So how do instructors prepare themselves to teach online? What are their expectations of this new learning environment for the first time? The nature of faculty preparation and duration of experience affecting the performance between faculty will vary considerably, and support provided for online teaching also vary over a period of time. The objectives of this study were to obtain/ collect the perception of medical and allied course faculty employed at Deemed to be University, Pondicherry, to online teaching compared to traditional teaching. Materials and Methods: The online questionnaire and informed consent were mailed to all the faculty, and they were instructed to rate on a five-point numerically coded Likert scale (Always = 5, Frequently = 4, Sometimes = 3, Seldom = 2 and Never = 1) their satisfaction level to an online lecture class. Preliminary details, such as name, age, gender, department, college and post P.G experience, were obtained. Based on the scoring, inferential analysis was done. The online discussion session was done amongst selective participants, and a thematic analysis of the same was done. Results: A total of 119 participants responded to the questionnaire. An unpaired t -test was applied, and a significant difference ( P ≤ 0.05) was observed in the 17 questions in the study population between online and traditional lectures. Conclusion: Faculty were overall not satisfied with online lecture classes as they had trouble providing set induction and adequate closure, enabling pupil participation during lecture presentation and time management compared to traditional/conventional lecture classes. Faculty feel that online teaching can continue in the post-pandemic era for a few selectively chosen appropriate topics, and the class duration should be short. A blended approach to learning can be adopted in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_146_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpp_146_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:大多数教师几乎没有在线教学的经验,因为他们的大部分学习和教学时间都是在传统的面对面课堂上度过的。那么,教师如何为在线教学做准备呢?他们第一次对这个新的学习环境有什么期望?教师准备的性质和影响教师之间表现的经验持续时间将有很大差异,对在线教学提供的支持也会在一段时间内有所不同。本研究的目的是获得/收集在本地治里大学受雇的医学和相关课程教师对在线教学与传统教学的看法。材料和方法:将在线问卷和知情同意书邮寄给所有教师,并要求他们按照5分数字编码的李克特量表(总是= 5,经常= 4,有时= 3,很少= 2和从不= 1)对在线讲座课程的满意度进行评分。初步的细节,如姓名,年龄,性别,系,学院和后p.g.经验,得到了。根据评分结果进行推理分析。在线讨论是在选定的参与者中进行的,并对其进行专题分析。结果:共119人参与问卷调查。采用非配对t检验,在研究人群中的17个问题中,在线讲座与传统讲座之间存在显著差异(P≤0.05)。结论:总体而言,教师对在线讲座课程不满意,因为与传统/传统的讲座课程相比,他们在提供设置的诱导和适当的结束方面存在困难,无法使学生参与讲座演示和时间管理。教师们认为,在线教学可以在疫情后的时代继续进行,有选择地选择一些适当的主题,上课时间应该短。将来可以采用混合式学习方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Self-reflection and perception of medical and allied courses faculty to online teaching compared to traditional teaching: A mixed-method study
Objectives: Most teachers have minimal experience with online teaching since most of their learning and teaching years have been spent in a traditional face-to-face classroom. So how do instructors prepare themselves to teach online? What are their expectations of this new learning environment for the first time? The nature of faculty preparation and duration of experience affecting the performance between faculty will vary considerably, and support provided for online teaching also vary over a period of time. The objectives of this study were to obtain/ collect the perception of medical and allied course faculty employed at Deemed to be University, Pondicherry, to online teaching compared to traditional teaching. Materials and Methods: The online questionnaire and informed consent were mailed to all the faculty, and they were instructed to rate on a five-point numerically coded Likert scale (Always = 5, Frequently = 4, Sometimes = 3, Seldom = 2 and Never = 1) their satisfaction level to an online lecture class. Preliminary details, such as name, age, gender, department, college and post P.G experience, were obtained. Based on the scoring, inferential analysis was done. The online discussion session was done amongst selective participants, and a thematic analysis of the same was done. Results: A total of 119 participants responded to the questionnaire. An unpaired t -test was applied, and a significant difference ( P ≤ 0.05) was observed in the 17 questions in the study population between online and traditional lectures. Conclusion: Faculty were overall not satisfied with online lecture classes as they had trouble providing set induction and adequate closure, enabling pupil participation during lecture presentation and time management compared to traditional/conventional lecture classes. Faculty feel that online teaching can continue in the post-pandemic era for a few selectively chosen appropriate topics, and the class duration should be short. A blended approach to learning can be adopted in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology
Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology (IJPP) welcomes original manuscripts based upon research in physiological, pharmacological and allied sciences from any part of the world.
期刊最新文献
A randomised controlled trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction programme for substance abuse patients in deaddiction centre Faculty perceptions of the efficacy, benefits and challenges of simulation-based early clinical exposure for medical students in India: A qualitative study Oesophageal pressure topographic metrics in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: An Indian perspective Erratum: Breath characteristics in four volitional yoga breathing practices Deep brain stimulation for the heterogeneous pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1