哪些因素推动了国家技术专业化模式进入以科学为基础的时代?英国的经验,1918-1932

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Industrial and Corporate Change Pub Date : 2023-01-24 DOI:10.1093/icc/dtac062
John Cantwell, Anna Spadavecchia
{"title":"哪些因素推动了国家技术专业化模式进入以科学为基础的时代?英国的经验,1918-1932","authors":"John Cantwell, Anna Spadavecchia","doi":"10.1093/icc/dtac062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article assesses the contributions of industry leaders, smaller corporations, and independent inventors to the international technological specialization of Great Britain in the interwar years. For the first time, we compare directly the contribution of these sources and combine the Chandlerian and “sources of invention” perspectives. The analysis is based on a novel dataset of more than 8,000 patents granted in the USA to British inventions. Our findings show the extent to which Britain integrated inventions generated by independent inventors with those of corporate inventors, i.e., industry leaders and smaller corporations, in both engineering- and science-based fields. This research highlights specificities of a former leader’s transition from the technological paradigm of the first phase of capitalism to that of the second phase.","PeriodicalId":48243,"journal":{"name":"Industrial and Corporate Change","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which actors drove national patterns of technological specialization into the science-based age? The British experience, 1918–1932\",\"authors\":\"John Cantwell, Anna Spadavecchia\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/icc/dtac062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article assesses the contributions of industry leaders, smaller corporations, and independent inventors to the international technological specialization of Great Britain in the interwar years. For the first time, we compare directly the contribution of these sources and combine the Chandlerian and “sources of invention” perspectives. The analysis is based on a novel dataset of more than 8,000 patents granted in the USA to British inventions. Our findings show the extent to which Britain integrated inventions generated by independent inventors with those of corporate inventors, i.e., industry leaders and smaller corporations, in both engineering- and science-based fields. This research highlights specificities of a former leader’s transition from the technological paradigm of the first phase of capitalism to that of the second phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial and Corporate Change\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial and Corporate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial and Corporate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtac062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文评估了两次世界大战期间,工业领袖、小型企业和独立发明家对英国国际技术专业化的贡献。我们第一次直接比较了这些来源的贡献,并结合了钱德勒学派和“发明来源”的观点。这项分析是基于一个新的数据集,该数据集包含了在美国授予英国发明的8000多项专利。我们的研究结果表明,在工程和科学领域,英国将独立发明人的发明与企业发明人(即行业领导者和小型公司)的发明结合在一起的程度。本研究强调了前领导人从资本主义第一阶段的技术范式过渡到第二阶段的特殊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Which actors drove national patterns of technological specialization into the science-based age? The British experience, 1918–1932
Abstract This article assesses the contributions of industry leaders, smaller corporations, and independent inventors to the international technological specialization of Great Britain in the interwar years. For the first time, we compare directly the contribution of these sources and combine the Chandlerian and “sources of invention” perspectives. The analysis is based on a novel dataset of more than 8,000 patents granted in the USA to British inventions. Our findings show the extent to which Britain integrated inventions generated by independent inventors with those of corporate inventors, i.e., industry leaders and smaller corporations, in both engineering- and science-based fields. This research highlights specificities of a former leader’s transition from the technological paradigm of the first phase of capitalism to that of the second phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The journal covers the following: the internal structures of firms; the history of technologies; the evolution of industries; the nature of competition; the decision rules and strategies; the relationship between firms" characteristics and the institutional environment; the sociology of management and of the workforce; the performance of industries over time; the labour process and the organization of production; the relationship between, and boundaries of, organizations and markets; the nature of the learning process underlying technological and organizational change.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge-based approaches to the firm: an idea-driven perspective Homeowners’ financial vulnerability over the house price cycle How heuristic pricing shapes the aggregate market: the “Cheap Twin Paradox” Beyond trading: knowledge spillovers and learning-by-exporting in global value chains Export performance, innovation, and sectoral efficiency: a multilevel model for Argentinian manufacturing firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1