胆囊切除术后残余胆结石致肝周脓肿1例

{"title":"胆囊切除术后残余胆结石致肝周脓肿1例","authors":"","doi":"10.7176/jep/14-29-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Intraabdominal abscesses are collections of pus or infected material, surrounded by inflammatory tissues in the abdominal cavity. Clinically they are manifested with fever, abdominal pain, malaise, weakness, change in bowel habits, etc. On physical examination a palpable, swollen and tender mass of the abdomen may be noted. Blood tests may show an elevated number of leucocytes with the predominance of neutrophiles. Also, inflammation markers such as CRP, ESR and procalcitonin may be elevated. Diagnosis of an abdominal abscess is confirmed, but not limited to Computed Tomography, Ultrasound, MRI. Antibiotic therapy may be of use treating the cause of the abdominal abscess, however once the abcess is formed, antibiotics lose their effectiveness. Percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic or open surgery are the options for the definite treatment of intraabdominal abscesses. Case presentation Our patient is a 70 years old male with a past surgical history of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy 5 years prior to the current events. He presents to the surgical department for a lumbar region abscess which had been drained three times for the past 6 months. On clinical examination a considerable reddish tumefaction on the right lumbar region evacuates upon incision a moderate amount of odourless pus. An abdominal CT shows a subphrenic and subhepatic abscess with a communicating trajectory from the abscess to the skin opening in the lumbar region. Contrast MRI confirms the presence of numerous stones inside the subhepatic collection. The abscess was drained via open surgery and residual gallstones were removed. The patient recovers well. Discussion Only after the development of laparoscopic technique, cases of abdominal abscesses due to residual stones have started to appear in the literature, hence the name “disease of medical progress”. Studies show that between 5-40% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies are complicated by gallbladder perforation and stone spillage, more commonly in acute inflammation cases. 15-50% of the spilled stones are not retrieved and may migrate and cause significant complications. Most of the abdominal abscesses from residual gallstones form in the first year after cholecystectomy, or many years later. Compliances rate following gallstone spillage vary widely from 0.04% to 19%. Cases of acute cholecystitis, male sex, old age, number of lost stones greater than 15, diameter over 15mm and perihepatic localization are predictors of severe morbidity. Conclusion There is no clear consensus on the treatment and management of lost gallstones during cholecystectomy, but every attempt should be made to collect spilled stones. Surgeons should document cases of lost and unretrievable gallstones and inform patients, as complications may be rare but severe and demand more often than not open surgery. Keywords: General Surgery, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Residual Gallstones, Perihepatic Abscess. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/14-29-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2023","PeriodicalId":37226,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Practice","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perihepatic Abscess due to Remnant Gallstones Post-Cholecystectomy – Case Report\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/jep/14-29-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Intraabdominal abscesses are collections of pus or infected material, surrounded by inflammatory tissues in the abdominal cavity. Clinically they are manifested with fever, abdominal pain, malaise, weakness, change in bowel habits, etc. On physical examination a palpable, swollen and tender mass of the abdomen may be noted. Blood tests may show an elevated number of leucocytes with the predominance of neutrophiles. Also, inflammation markers such as CRP, ESR and procalcitonin may be elevated. Diagnosis of an abdominal abscess is confirmed, but not limited to Computed Tomography, Ultrasound, MRI. Antibiotic therapy may be of use treating the cause of the abdominal abscess, however once the abcess is formed, antibiotics lose their effectiveness. Percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic or open surgery are the options for the definite treatment of intraabdominal abscesses. Case presentation Our patient is a 70 years old male with a past surgical history of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy 5 years prior to the current events. He presents to the surgical department for a lumbar region abscess which had been drained three times for the past 6 months. On clinical examination a considerable reddish tumefaction on the right lumbar region evacuates upon incision a moderate amount of odourless pus. An abdominal CT shows a subphrenic and subhepatic abscess with a communicating trajectory from the abscess to the skin opening in the lumbar region. Contrast MRI confirms the presence of numerous stones inside the subhepatic collection. The abscess was drained via open surgery and residual gallstones were removed. The patient recovers well. Discussion Only after the development of laparoscopic technique, cases of abdominal abscesses due to residual stones have started to appear in the literature, hence the name “disease of medical progress”. Studies show that between 5-40% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies are complicated by gallbladder perforation and stone spillage, more commonly in acute inflammation cases. 15-50% of the spilled stones are not retrieved and may migrate and cause significant complications. Most of the abdominal abscesses from residual gallstones form in the first year after cholecystectomy, or many years later. Compliances rate following gallstone spillage vary widely from 0.04% to 19%. Cases of acute cholecystitis, male sex, old age, number of lost stones greater than 15, diameter over 15mm and perihepatic localization are predictors of severe morbidity. Conclusion There is no clear consensus on the treatment and management of lost gallstones during cholecystectomy, but every attempt should be made to collect spilled stones. Surgeons should document cases of lost and unretrievable gallstones and inform patients, as complications may be rare but severe and demand more often than not open surgery. Keywords: General Surgery, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Residual Gallstones, Perihepatic Abscess. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/14-29-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":37226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/14-29-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/14-29-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹内脓肿是由腹腔内的炎症组织包围的脓液或感染物质的集合。临床表现为发热、腹痛、乏力、排便习惯改变等。体格检查可发现可触及的、肿胀的、压痛的腹部肿块。血液检查可显示白细胞数量升高,中性粒细胞占优势。此外,炎症标志物如CRP、ESR和降钙素原也可能升高。腹部脓肿的诊断是确定的,但不限于计算机断层扫描,超声,MRI。抗生素治疗可用于治疗腹部脓肿的原因,但一旦脓肿形成,抗生素就失去了效果。经皮引流,腹腔镜或开放手术是明确治疗腹内脓肿的选择。病例介绍我们的患者是一名70岁的男性,在本次事件发生前5年有过腹腔镜胆囊切除术的病史。他向外科提出腰部脓肿已引流三次,在过去的6个月。临床检查显示,右侧腰椎有相当大的红色肿物,在切口处有适量无臭脓液排出。腹部CT显示膈下和肝下脓肿,并有从脓肿到腰部皮肤开口的交通轨迹。磁共振造影证实肝下集合内存在大量结石。通过开放手术引流脓肿,取出残余胆结石。病人恢复得很好。只有在腹腔镜技术发展之后,文献中才开始出现由残余结石引起的腹部脓肿病例,因此被称为“医学进步病”。研究表明,5-40%的腹腔镜胆囊切除术合并胆囊穿孔和结石溢出,更常见于急性炎症病例。15-50%的结石没有被取出,可能会迁移并引起严重的并发症。大多数由残余胆结石引起的腹部脓肿在胆囊切除术后的第一年或多年后形成。胆结石溢漏后的依从率从0.04%到19%不等。急性胆囊炎病例、男性、老年、结石数量大于15、直径大于15mm和肝周定位是严重发病率的预测因素。结论胆囊切除术中结石丢失的治疗和处理尚无明确的共识,但应尽量收集结石。外科医生应记录胆囊结石丢失和无法取出的病例,并告知患者,因为并发症可能罕见但严重,通常需要开腹手术。关键词:普通外科,腹腔镜胆囊切除术,残余胆结石,肝周脓肿。DOI: 10.7176/JEP/14-29-04出版日期:2023年10月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perihepatic Abscess due to Remnant Gallstones Post-Cholecystectomy – Case Report
Background Intraabdominal abscesses are collections of pus or infected material, surrounded by inflammatory tissues in the abdominal cavity. Clinically they are manifested with fever, abdominal pain, malaise, weakness, change in bowel habits, etc. On physical examination a palpable, swollen and tender mass of the abdomen may be noted. Blood tests may show an elevated number of leucocytes with the predominance of neutrophiles. Also, inflammation markers such as CRP, ESR and procalcitonin may be elevated. Diagnosis of an abdominal abscess is confirmed, but not limited to Computed Tomography, Ultrasound, MRI. Antibiotic therapy may be of use treating the cause of the abdominal abscess, however once the abcess is formed, antibiotics lose their effectiveness. Percutaneous drainage, laparoscopic or open surgery are the options for the definite treatment of intraabdominal abscesses. Case presentation Our patient is a 70 years old male with a past surgical history of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy 5 years prior to the current events. He presents to the surgical department for a lumbar region abscess which had been drained three times for the past 6 months. On clinical examination a considerable reddish tumefaction on the right lumbar region evacuates upon incision a moderate amount of odourless pus. An abdominal CT shows a subphrenic and subhepatic abscess with a communicating trajectory from the abscess to the skin opening in the lumbar region. Contrast MRI confirms the presence of numerous stones inside the subhepatic collection. The abscess was drained via open surgery and residual gallstones were removed. The patient recovers well. Discussion Only after the development of laparoscopic technique, cases of abdominal abscesses due to residual stones have started to appear in the literature, hence the name “disease of medical progress”. Studies show that between 5-40% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies are complicated by gallbladder perforation and stone spillage, more commonly in acute inflammation cases. 15-50% of the spilled stones are not retrieved and may migrate and cause significant complications. Most of the abdominal abscesses from residual gallstones form in the first year after cholecystectomy, or many years later. Compliances rate following gallstone spillage vary widely from 0.04% to 19%. Cases of acute cholecystitis, male sex, old age, number of lost stones greater than 15, diameter over 15mm and perihepatic localization are predictors of severe morbidity. Conclusion There is no clear consensus on the treatment and management of lost gallstones during cholecystectomy, but every attempt should be made to collect spilled stones. Surgeons should document cases of lost and unretrievable gallstones and inform patients, as complications may be rare but severe and demand more often than not open surgery. Keywords: General Surgery, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Residual Gallstones, Perihepatic Abscess. DOI: 10.7176/JEP/14-29-04 Publication date: October 31 st 2023
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
The impact of values, identity and personal norms on the green entrepreneurial intention of university students in South Africa Higher education students’ online class experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic School leaders’ and teachers’ perceptions of the feedback and evaluation system in Albania The effects of voice blogging on upper secondary students’ L2 Kazakh speaking performance Mathematics education for students with intellectual disabilities: A study on thematic books utilization in special schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1