对陌生人的愤怒:关系类型的愤怒引发和调节

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY American Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5406/19398298.136.3.04
Jade Abigail Witten, Emma Truss, Rudi Coetzer, Oliver Hugh Turnbull
{"title":"对陌生人的愤怒:关系类型的愤怒引发和调节","authors":"Jade Abigail Witten, Emma Truss, Rudi Coetzer, Oliver Hugh Turnbull","doi":"10.5406/19398298.136.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anger can be the most socially debilitating of the basic emotions, and effective and simple techniques for managing anger are much needed. Autobiographical recall is a powerful method for emotion elicitation, with obvious clinical utility. However, the content of the material elicited, most notably the variable of relationship type, has not been systematically studied. The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Affective Story Recall task for anger elicitation, using 5 relationship categories (family, partner, friend, stranger, abstract) and the effectiveness of 2 emotion regulation (ER) techniques: reappraisal and distraction. Fifty-two neurologically healthy adults completed a series of anger elicitation and regulation tasks, several measures of cognitive ability, and questionnaires on attachment styles and the use of ER techniques. Most relationship categories selectively elicited anger, with some categories (e.g., stranger) eliciting especially high levels. Both reappraisal and distraction reduced anger intensity across all relationship categories. However, distraction was particularly effective for strangers. Distraction effectiveness was predicted by the regular use of this ER technique, attachment style, and age, but cognitive factors played no significant role. These findings have implications for rehabilitation, allowing clinicians to tailor interventions to patients’ strengths and weaknesses.","PeriodicalId":48063,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rage at Strangers: Anger Elicitation and Regulation as a Function of Relationship Type\",\"authors\":\"Jade Abigail Witten, Emma Truss, Rudi Coetzer, Oliver Hugh Turnbull\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/19398298.136.3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anger can be the most socially debilitating of the basic emotions, and effective and simple techniques for managing anger are much needed. Autobiographical recall is a powerful method for emotion elicitation, with obvious clinical utility. However, the content of the material elicited, most notably the variable of relationship type, has not been systematically studied. The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Affective Story Recall task for anger elicitation, using 5 relationship categories (family, partner, friend, stranger, abstract) and the effectiveness of 2 emotion regulation (ER) techniques: reappraisal and distraction. Fifty-two neurologically healthy adults completed a series of anger elicitation and regulation tasks, several measures of cognitive ability, and questionnaires on attachment styles and the use of ER techniques. Most relationship categories selectively elicited anger, with some categories (e.g., stranger) eliciting especially high levels. Both reappraisal and distraction reduced anger intensity across all relationship categories. However, distraction was particularly effective for strangers. Distraction effectiveness was predicted by the regular use of this ER technique, attachment style, and age, but cognitive factors played no significant role. These findings have implications for rehabilitation, allowing clinicians to tailor interventions to patients’ strengths and weaknesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/19398298.136.3.04\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/19398298.136.3.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

愤怒是最能削弱社交能力的基本情绪,我们非常需要有效而简单的技巧来管理愤怒。自传式回忆是一种有效的情绪唤起方法,具有明显的临床应用价值。然而,所引出的材料的内容,尤其是关系类型的变量,尚未得到系统的研究。本研究利用5种关系类别(家庭、伴侣、朋友、陌生人、抽象)和2种情绪调节技巧(重新评价和分散注意力),考察了情感故事回忆任务对愤怒激发的有效性。52名神经系统健康的成年人完成了一系列的愤怒激发和调节任务,一些认知能力的测量,以及关于依恋类型和急诊室技术使用的问卷。大多数关系类别都会选择性地引发愤怒,其中一些类别(例如,陌生人)引发的愤怒程度特别高。重新评估和分散注意力都能降低所有关系类别的愤怒强度。然而,分散注意力对陌生人尤其有效。经常使用这种急诊室技术、依恋类型和年龄可以预测分心效果,但认知因素没有显著作用。这些发现对康复有一定的影响,使临床医生能够根据患者的长处和弱点量身定制干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rage at Strangers: Anger Elicitation and Regulation as a Function of Relationship Type
Anger can be the most socially debilitating of the basic emotions, and effective and simple techniques for managing anger are much needed. Autobiographical recall is a powerful method for emotion elicitation, with obvious clinical utility. However, the content of the material elicited, most notably the variable of relationship type, has not been systematically studied. The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Affective Story Recall task for anger elicitation, using 5 relationship categories (family, partner, friend, stranger, abstract) and the effectiveness of 2 emotion regulation (ER) techniques: reappraisal and distraction. Fifty-two neurologically healthy adults completed a series of anger elicitation and regulation tasks, several measures of cognitive ability, and questionnaires on attachment styles and the use of ER techniques. Most relationship categories selectively elicited anger, with some categories (e.g., stranger) eliciting especially high levels. Both reappraisal and distraction reduced anger intensity across all relationship categories. However, distraction was particularly effective for strangers. Distraction effectiveness was predicted by the regular use of this ER technique, attachment style, and age, but cognitive factors played no significant role. These findings have implications for rehabilitation, allowing clinicians to tailor interventions to patients’ strengths and weaknesses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychology
American Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychology (AJP) was founded in 1887 by G. Stanley Hall and was edited in its early years by Titchener, Boring, and Dallenbach. The Journal has published some of the most innovative and formative papers in psychology throughout its history. AJP explores the science of the mind and behavior, publishing reports of original research in experimental psychology, theoretical presentations, combined theoretical and experimental analyses, historical commentaries, and in-depth reviews of significant books.
期刊最新文献
Entrepreneurial habits and Adolescent Socialization into Economic Independence among the Bamilékés of West Cameroon Rage at Strangers: Anger Elicitation and Regulation as a Function of Relationship Type Rebellion Management Theory Is the Missing Letter Effect Due Primarily to the Test Word Containing the Target Letter or to the Surrounding Words? Edward Bradford Titchener: 3. Psychology as Science: With Wundt at Leipzig
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1