次生林比原始热带森林的土壤碳损失更大

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Forests and Global Change Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.3389/ffgc.2023.1135270
Nanette C. Raczka, Qian Yi Ho, Vupasana Srinivasan, Ming Yang Lee, Chung-Wing Ko, Madeleine Königer, Terence Chua, Delia Binny, Kang Min Ngo, Kelly M. Andersen
{"title":"次生林比原始热带森林的土壤碳损失更大","authors":"Nanette C. Raczka, Qian Yi Ho, Vupasana Srinivasan, Ming Yang Lee, Chung-Wing Ko, Madeleine Königer, Terence Chua, Delia Binny, Kang Min Ngo, Kelly M. Andersen","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1135270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tropical forests play a crucial role in mediating the global carbon cycle and climate. Southeast Asian tropical forests are experiencing ongoing threats of deforestation and degradation. There is an urgent need to determine how the conversion from primary forest to secondary forest coverage may impact C stocks and cycling. While old-growth forests typically contain larger stores of C aboveground than secondary forests, past research has found varied results for belowground soil C storage and fluxes between tropical forest types. We examined differences in annual soil C efflux in a 2-ha old-growth and an adjacent 2-ha 70-year-old secondary ForestGEO plots in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve in Singapore. We hypothesized that the secondary forest would have greater soil C efflux rates than the old-growth forest and explored several potential drivers of soil C efflux including abiotic and biotic factors such as soil moisture, fine root biomass, and ectomycorrhizal association. We found that the hypothesis was supported, suggesting that belowground carbon dynamics fundamentally differ with forest age. Additionally, we found that fine root biomass was the best predictor of soil C efflux in the secondary forest and soil moisture in the old-growth forest. The difference in soil C efflux between forest types indicates that with continued degradation of old-growth forests in Southeast Asia, conversion of old-growth forests into secondary forests may drive greater C loss from soils even after 70 years of regrowth.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greater soil carbon losses from secondary than old-growth tropical forests\",\"authors\":\"Nanette C. Raczka, Qian Yi Ho, Vupasana Srinivasan, Ming Yang Lee, Chung-Wing Ko, Madeleine Königer, Terence Chua, Delia Binny, Kang Min Ngo, Kelly M. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffgc.2023.1135270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tropical forests play a crucial role in mediating the global carbon cycle and climate. Southeast Asian tropical forests are experiencing ongoing threats of deforestation and degradation. There is an urgent need to determine how the conversion from primary forest to secondary forest coverage may impact C stocks and cycling. While old-growth forests typically contain larger stores of C aboveground than secondary forests, past research has found varied results for belowground soil C storage and fluxes between tropical forest types. We examined differences in annual soil C efflux in a 2-ha old-growth and an adjacent 2-ha 70-year-old secondary ForestGEO plots in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve in Singapore. We hypothesized that the secondary forest would have greater soil C efflux rates than the old-growth forest and explored several potential drivers of soil C efflux including abiotic and biotic factors such as soil moisture, fine root biomass, and ectomycorrhizal association. We found that the hypothesis was supported, suggesting that belowground carbon dynamics fundamentally differ with forest age. Additionally, we found that fine root biomass was the best predictor of soil C efflux in the secondary forest and soil moisture in the old-growth forest. The difference in soil C efflux between forest types indicates that with continued degradation of old-growth forests in Southeast Asia, conversion of old-growth forests into secondary forests may drive greater C loss from soils even after 70 years of regrowth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"volume\":\"152 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1135270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1135270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

热带森林在调节全球碳循环和气候方面发挥着至关重要的作用。东南亚热带森林正面临着森林砍伐和退化的持续威胁。迫切需要确定从原生林到次生林覆盖的转换如何影响碳储量和循环。虽然原生林通常比次生林含有更多的地上碳储量,但过去的研究发现,热带森林类型之间地下土壤碳储量和通量的结果各不相同。我们研究了新加坡武吉知马自然保护区一个2公顷的原生林和相邻的2公顷70年的次生ForestGEO地块年土壤C外流的差异。我们假设次生林比原生林具有更大的土壤碳外排速率,并探讨了土壤碳外排的几种潜在驱动因素,包括土壤湿度、细根生物量和外生菌根关联等非生物和生物因素。我们发现这一假设得到了支持,表明地下碳动态与森林年龄存在根本差异。此外,我们发现细根生物量是次生林土壤碳通量和原生林土壤水分的最佳预测因子。不同森林类型间土壤碳外排的差异表明,随着东南亚原生林的持续退化,即使在70年的再生后,原生林向次生林的转变也可能导致土壤中碳的更大损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greater soil carbon losses from secondary than old-growth tropical forests
Tropical forests play a crucial role in mediating the global carbon cycle and climate. Southeast Asian tropical forests are experiencing ongoing threats of deforestation and degradation. There is an urgent need to determine how the conversion from primary forest to secondary forest coverage may impact C stocks and cycling. While old-growth forests typically contain larger stores of C aboveground than secondary forests, past research has found varied results for belowground soil C storage and fluxes between tropical forest types. We examined differences in annual soil C efflux in a 2-ha old-growth and an adjacent 2-ha 70-year-old secondary ForestGEO plots in Bukit Timah Nature Reserve in Singapore. We hypothesized that the secondary forest would have greater soil C efflux rates than the old-growth forest and explored several potential drivers of soil C efflux including abiotic and biotic factors such as soil moisture, fine root biomass, and ectomycorrhizal association. We found that the hypothesis was supported, suggesting that belowground carbon dynamics fundamentally differ with forest age. Additionally, we found that fine root biomass was the best predictor of soil C efflux in the secondary forest and soil moisture in the old-growth forest. The difference in soil C efflux between forest types indicates that with continued degradation of old-growth forests in Southeast Asia, conversion of old-growth forests into secondary forests may drive greater C loss from soils even after 70 years of regrowth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal plants together shape seedling diversity in a subtropical forest Juvenile hormone III induction reveals key genes in general metabolism, pheromone biosynthesis, and detoxification in Eurasian spruce bark beetle Multi-dimensional temperature sensitivity of protected tropical mountain rain forests Accelerating decline of wildfires in China in the 21st century Factors driving carbon accumulation in forest biomass and soil organic carbon across natural forests and planted forests in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1