阻力模型和传热相关性对鼓泡流化床反应性多分散流动模拟影响的计算研究

IF 1.8 Q3 MECHANICS Fluids Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.3390/fluids8110290
Manuel Ernani Cruz, Gabriel Lisbôa Verissimo, Filipe Leite Brandão, Albino José Kalab Leiroz
{"title":"阻力模型和传热相关性对鼓泡流化床反应性多分散流动模拟影响的计算研究","authors":"Manuel Ernani Cruz, Gabriel Lisbôa Verissimo, Filipe Leite Brandão, Albino José Kalab Leiroz","doi":"10.3390/fluids8110290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, the influence of gas–solid drag and heat transfer coefficient models on the prediction capacity of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive bubbling fluidized bed flows is studied. Three different cases are considered, a non-reactive bidisperse bubbling fluidized bed flow (Case 1), and two reactive polydisperse flows in bubbling fluidized beds, one for biomass gasification (Case 2), and the other for biomass pyrolysis (Case 3). The Gidaspow, Syamlal–O’Brien, and BVK gas–solid drag models and the Gunn, Ranz–Marshall, and Li–Mason gas–solid heat transfer correlations are investigated. A Eulerian multiphase approach in a two-dimensional Cartesian domain is employed for the simulations. Computational results for the three cases are compared with experimental data from the literature. The results obtained here contribute to a better understanding of the impacts of such closure models on the prediction ability of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive flows. The results indicate that, for the simulation of reactive flows in bubbling fluidized bed reactors, the kinetic modeling of the reactions has a global effect, which superposes with the influence of the drag and heat transfer coefficient models. Nevertheless, local parameters can be noticeably affected by the choice of the interface closure models. Finally, this work also identifies the models that lead to the best results for the cases analyzed here, and thus proposes the use of such selected models for gasification and pyrolysis processes occurring in bubbling fluidized bed reactors.","PeriodicalId":12397,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":"282 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Computational Study of the Influence of Drag Models and Heat Transfer Correlations on the Simulations of Reactive Polydisperse Flows in Bubbling Fluidized Beds\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Ernani Cruz, Gabriel Lisbôa Verissimo, Filipe Leite Brandão, Albino José Kalab Leiroz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/fluids8110290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, the influence of gas–solid drag and heat transfer coefficient models on the prediction capacity of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive bubbling fluidized bed flows is studied. Three different cases are considered, a non-reactive bidisperse bubbling fluidized bed flow (Case 1), and two reactive polydisperse flows in bubbling fluidized beds, one for biomass gasification (Case 2), and the other for biomass pyrolysis (Case 3). The Gidaspow, Syamlal–O’Brien, and BVK gas–solid drag models and the Gunn, Ranz–Marshall, and Li–Mason gas–solid heat transfer correlations are investigated. A Eulerian multiphase approach in a two-dimensional Cartesian domain is employed for the simulations. Computational results for the three cases are compared with experimental data from the literature. The results obtained here contribute to a better understanding of the impacts of such closure models on the prediction ability of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive flows. The results indicate that, for the simulation of reactive flows in bubbling fluidized bed reactors, the kinetic modeling of the reactions has a global effect, which superposes with the influence of the drag and heat transfer coefficient models. Nevertheless, local parameters can be noticeably affected by the choice of the interface closure models. Finally, this work also identifies the models that lead to the best results for the cases analyzed here, and thus proposes the use of such selected models for gasification and pyrolysis processes occurring in bubbling fluidized bed reactors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fluids\",\"volume\":\"282 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8110290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids8110290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了气固阻力和传热系数模型对Euler-Euler方法模拟反应性鼓泡流化床流动预测能力的影响。考虑了三种不同的情况,即非反应性双分散鼓泡流化床流动(情况1),以及鼓泡流化床中的两种反应性多分散流动,一种用于生物质气化(情况2),另一种用于生物质热解(情况3)。Gidaspow, Syamlal-O 'Brien和BVK气固相拖阻模型以及Gunn, Ranz-Marshall和Li-Mason气固传热相关性进行了研究。采用二维笛卡尔域的欧拉多相法进行仿真。对这三种情况的计算结果与文献中的实验数据进行了比较。这里得到的结果有助于更好地理解这种封闭模型对欧拉-欧拉方法模拟反应流的预测能力的影响。结果表明,对于鼓泡流化床反应器中反应流动的模拟,反应动力学模型具有全局效应,与阻力和传热系数模型的影响叠加。然而,接口闭包模型的选择会显著影响局部参数。最后,本工作还确定了导致这里分析的情况下的最佳结果的模型,从而提出了在鼓泡流化床反应器中发生的气化和热解过程中使用这些选定的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Computational Study of the Influence of Drag Models and Heat Transfer Correlations on the Simulations of Reactive Polydisperse Flows in Bubbling Fluidized Beds
In this work, the influence of gas–solid drag and heat transfer coefficient models on the prediction capacity of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive bubbling fluidized bed flows is studied. Three different cases are considered, a non-reactive bidisperse bubbling fluidized bed flow (Case 1), and two reactive polydisperse flows in bubbling fluidized beds, one for biomass gasification (Case 2), and the other for biomass pyrolysis (Case 3). The Gidaspow, Syamlal–O’Brien, and BVK gas–solid drag models and the Gunn, Ranz–Marshall, and Li–Mason gas–solid heat transfer correlations are investigated. A Eulerian multiphase approach in a two-dimensional Cartesian domain is employed for the simulations. Computational results for the three cases are compared with experimental data from the literature. The results obtained here contribute to a better understanding of the impacts of such closure models on the prediction ability of the Euler–Euler approach to simulate reactive flows. The results indicate that, for the simulation of reactive flows in bubbling fluidized bed reactors, the kinetic modeling of the reactions has a global effect, which superposes with the influence of the drag and heat transfer coefficient models. Nevertheless, local parameters can be noticeably affected by the choice of the interface closure models. Finally, this work also identifies the models that lead to the best results for the cases analyzed here, and thus proposes the use of such selected models for gasification and pyrolysis processes occurring in bubbling fluidized bed reactors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fluids
Fluids Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
326
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deeper Flow Behavior Explanation of Temperature Effects on the Fluid Dynamic inside a Tundish Continuous Eddy Simulation vs. Resolution-Imposing Simulation Methods for Turbulent Flows Application of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Rheological Behavior of BN-diamond/Thermal Oil Hybrid Nanofluids A Spectral/hp-Based Stabilized Solver with Emphasis on the Euler Equations Quantitative Color Schlieren for an H2–O2 Exhaust Jet Developing in Air
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1