面对面和远程医疗自闭症评估中的诊断确定性

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12201
Natasha N. Ludwig, Calliope Holingue, Ji Su Hong, Luther G. Kalb, Danika Pfeiffer, Rachel Reetzke, Deepa Menon, Rebecca Landa
{"title":"面对面和远程医疗自闭症评估中的诊断确定性","authors":"Natasha N. Ludwig,&nbsp;Calliope Holingue,&nbsp;Ji Su Hong,&nbsp;Luther G. Kalb,&nbsp;Danika Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Rachel Reetzke,&nbsp;Deepa Menon,&nbsp;Rebecca Landa","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Many diagnostic evaluations abruptly shifted to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, little is known about the impact on diagnosis patterns for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this clinical research study was to examine (1) the frequency of diagnoses evaluated beyond ASD; (2) the frequency of diagnoses made, including ASD; and (3) clinician diagnostic certainty for all diagnoses evaluated for children who received an evaluation due to primary concerns about ASD via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those evaluated in person before the pandemic at an ASD specialty clinic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 2192 children, 1–17 years (<i>M</i> = 6.5 years; <i>SD</i> = 3.9), evaluated by a physician/psychologist at an ASD specialty center. A total of 649 children were evaluated in-person September 1, 2019–March 13, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and 1543 were evaluated via telehealth March 14, 2020–July 26, 2021 (during pandemic). Upon completion of each evaluation, clinicians provided a final diagnostic determination (i.e., “<i>Yes,” “No,” “Possible,”</i> or “<i>Not Assessed”</i>) for the following DSM-5 conditions: ASD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual developmental disorder (IDD), anxiety (ANX), depression (DEP), and behavioral disorder (BD). “<i>Possible</i>” indicated lower certainty and the diagnosis was not provided. “<i>Not Assessed</i>” indicated the disorder was not evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic certainty for ASD and ADHD was lower and clinicians evaluated for and made diagnoses of IDD less often during evaluations that occurred via telehealth during the pandemic versus in person before the pandemic. DEP and BD were diagnosed more frequently, diagnostic certainty of DEP was lower, and no differences in the frequency of ANX diagnoses emerged during evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those conducted in person before the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Differences emerged in the frequency of diagnoses evaluated and made and diagnostic certainty for evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to in person before the pandemic, which likely impacted patients and reflect real-word challenges. Future work should examine whether these patterns are generalizable and the mechanisms that contribute to these differences.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12201","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic certainty during in-person and telehealth autism evaluations\",\"authors\":\"Natasha N. Ludwig,&nbsp;Calliope Holingue,&nbsp;Ji Su Hong,&nbsp;Luther G. Kalb,&nbsp;Danika Pfeiffer,&nbsp;Rachel Reetzke,&nbsp;Deepa Menon,&nbsp;Rebecca Landa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcv2.12201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Many diagnostic evaluations abruptly shifted to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, little is known about the impact on diagnosis patterns for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this clinical research study was to examine (1) the frequency of diagnoses evaluated beyond ASD; (2) the frequency of diagnoses made, including ASD; and (3) clinician diagnostic certainty for all diagnoses evaluated for children who received an evaluation due to primary concerns about ASD via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those evaluated in person before the pandemic at an ASD specialty clinic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sample included 2192 children, 1–17 years (<i>M</i> = 6.5 years; <i>SD</i> = 3.9), evaluated by a physician/psychologist at an ASD specialty center. A total of 649 children were evaluated in-person September 1, 2019–March 13, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and 1543 were evaluated via telehealth March 14, 2020–July 26, 2021 (during pandemic). Upon completion of each evaluation, clinicians provided a final diagnostic determination (i.e., “<i>Yes,” “No,” “Possible,”</i> or “<i>Not Assessed”</i>) for the following DSM-5 conditions: ASD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual developmental disorder (IDD), anxiety (ANX), depression (DEP), and behavioral disorder (BD). “<i>Possible</i>” indicated lower certainty and the diagnosis was not provided. “<i>Not Assessed</i>” indicated the disorder was not evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic certainty for ASD and ADHD was lower and clinicians evaluated for and made diagnoses of IDD less often during evaluations that occurred via telehealth during the pandemic versus in person before the pandemic. DEP and BD were diagnosed more frequently, diagnostic certainty of DEP was lower, and no differences in the frequency of ANX diagnoses emerged during evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those conducted in person before the pandemic.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Differences emerged in the frequency of diagnoses evaluated and made and diagnostic certainty for evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to in person before the pandemic, which likely impacted patients and reflect real-word challenges. Future work should examine whether these patterns are generalizable and the mechanisms that contribute to these differences.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCPP advances\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcv2.12201\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCPP advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcv2.12201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在 COVID-19 大流行期间,许多诊断评估突然转向远程医疗;然而,人们对自闭症谱系障碍 (ASD) 评估对儿童诊断模式的影响知之甚少。这项临床研究的目的是检查 (1) 除 ASD 以外的诊断频率;(2) 包括 ASD 在内的诊断频率;(3) 与大流行前在 ASD 专科门诊亲自接受评估的儿童相比,大流行期间通过远程医疗接受评估的因主要关注 ASD 而接受评估的儿童的所有诊断的临床医生诊断确定性。 方法 样本包括 2192 名 1-17 岁的儿童(中位数 = 6.5 岁;标准差 = 3.9),由 ASD 专科中心的医生/心理学家进行评估。共有 649 名儿童于 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 13 日(大流行前)接受了现场评估,1543 名儿童于 2020 年 3 月 14 日至 2021 年 7 月 26 日(大流行期间)接受了远程医疗评估。每次评估完成后,临床医生都会针对以下 DSM-5 病症给出最终诊断结果(即 "是"、"否"、"可能 "或 "未评估"):ASD、注意力缺陷/多动障碍 (ADHD)、智力发育障碍 (IDD)、焦虑 (ANX)、抑郁 (DEP) 和行为障碍 (BD)。"可能 "表示确定性较低,未提供诊断结果。"未评估 "表示未对该疾病进行评估。 结果 在大流行期间通过远程医疗进行的评估中,ASD 和 ADHD 的诊断确定性较低,临床医生对 IDD 的评估和诊断也较少。在大流行期间通过远程医疗进行的评估中,DEP 和 BD 的诊断频率较高,DEP 的诊断确定性较低,而 ANX 的诊断频率与大流行前亲自进行的评估相比没有出现差异。 结论 大流行期间通过远程医疗进行评估的诊断频率和诊断确定性与大流行前亲自进行评估的诊断频率和诊断确定性出现了差异,这可能会对患者产生影响,并反映出实际的挑战。未来的工作应研究这些模式是否具有普遍性,以及造成这些差异的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic certainty during in-person and telehealth autism evaluations

Background

Many diagnostic evaluations abruptly shifted to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, little is known about the impact on diagnosis patterns for children evaluated for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this clinical research study was to examine (1) the frequency of diagnoses evaluated beyond ASD; (2) the frequency of diagnoses made, including ASD; and (3) clinician diagnostic certainty for all diagnoses evaluated for children who received an evaluation due to primary concerns about ASD via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those evaluated in person before the pandemic at an ASD specialty clinic.

Methods

The sample included 2192 children, 1–17 years (M = 6.5 years; SD = 3.9), evaluated by a physician/psychologist at an ASD specialty center. A total of 649 children were evaluated in-person September 1, 2019–March 13, 2020 (pre-pandemic) and 1543 were evaluated via telehealth March 14, 2020–July 26, 2021 (during pandemic). Upon completion of each evaluation, clinicians provided a final diagnostic determination (i.e., “Yes,” “No,” “Possible,” or “Not Assessed”) for the following DSM-5 conditions: ASD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), intellectual developmental disorder (IDD), anxiety (ANX), depression (DEP), and behavioral disorder (BD). “Possible” indicated lower certainty and the diagnosis was not provided. “Not Assessed” indicated the disorder was not evaluated.

Results

Diagnostic certainty for ASD and ADHD was lower and clinicians evaluated for and made diagnoses of IDD less often during evaluations that occurred via telehealth during the pandemic versus in person before the pandemic. DEP and BD were diagnosed more frequently, diagnostic certainty of DEP was lower, and no differences in the frequency of ANX diagnoses emerged during evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to those conducted in person before the pandemic.

Conclusions

Differences emerged in the frequency of diagnoses evaluated and made and diagnostic certainty for evaluations conducted via telehealth during the pandemic compared to in person before the pandemic, which likely impacted patients and reflect real-word challenges. Future work should examine whether these patterns are generalizable and the mechanisms that contribute to these differences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Implementing open science and reproducible research practices in mental health research through registered reports Special educational needs provision and academic outcomes for children with teacher reported language difficulties at school entry Examining the association of neighborhood conditions on attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in autistic youth using the child opportunity index 2.0 The trajectory of anxiety symptoms during the transition from childhood to young adulthood is predicted by IQ and sex, but not polygenic risk scores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1