伦理问题和他人的面孔。马丁·布伯和伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯在对话中

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN ETUDES GERMANIQUES Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.3917/eger.309.0033
Silvia Richter
{"title":"伦理问题和他人的面孔。马丁·布伯和伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯在对话中","authors":"Silvia Richter","doi":"10.3917/eger.309.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the complex relationship between Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas, and focuses on the parallels and differences between both thinkers on different levels: First, with regard to language and its significance in the ethical relationship to the Other (Levinas) or the Thou (Buber). In a second step, their different approach to ethics is discussed: while Levinas characterizes the relationship to the Other as asymmetrical, for Buber the I encounters the Thou as an equal partner. In light of their different ethical conceptions, some of the key notions of Levinas’s and Buber’s thought are discussed and compared – the face of the other, the reciprocity of the relationship, the illeity and, last but not least, their different approach to Judaism.","PeriodicalId":41323,"journal":{"name":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le problème de l’éthique et le visage de l’autre. Martin Buber et Emmanuel Levinas en dialogue\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Richter\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/eger.309.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the complex relationship between Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas, and focuses on the parallels and differences between both thinkers on different levels: First, with regard to language and its significance in the ethical relationship to the Other (Levinas) or the Thou (Buber). In a second step, their different approach to ethics is discussed: while Levinas characterizes the relationship to the Other as asymmetrical, for Buber the I encounters the Thou as an equal partner. In light of their different ethical conceptions, some of the key notions of Levinas’s and Buber’s thought are discussed and compared – the face of the other, the reciprocity of the relationship, the illeity and, last but not least, their different approach to Judaism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ETUDES GERMANIQUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.309.0033\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETUDES GERMANIQUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/eger.309.0033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了马丁·布伯和伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯之间的复杂关系,并着重分析了两位思想家在不同层面上的相似之处和差异:首先,关于语言及其在与他者(列维纳斯)或你者(布伯)的伦理关系中的意义。在第二步中,讨论了他们不同的伦理方法:虽然列维纳斯将他者的关系描述为不对称的,但对布伯来说,“我”遇到“你”是一个平等的伙伴。鉴于列维那斯和布伯不同的伦理观念,本文对他们思想中的一些关键概念进行了讨论和比较。他者的面孔,关系的互惠,罪恶,最后但并非最不重要的是,他们对犹太教的不同态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le problème de l’éthique et le visage de l’autre. Martin Buber et Emmanuel Levinas en dialogue
This article examines the complex relationship between Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas, and focuses on the parallels and differences between both thinkers on different levels: First, with regard to language and its significance in the ethical relationship to the Other (Levinas) or the Thou (Buber). In a second step, their different approach to ethics is discussed: while Levinas characterizes the relationship to the Other as asymmetrical, for Buber the I encounters the Thou as an equal partner. In light of their different ethical conceptions, some of the key notions of Levinas’s and Buber’s thought are discussed and compared – the face of the other, the reciprocity of the relationship, the illeity and, last but not least, their different approach to Judaism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ETUDES GERMANIQUES
ETUDES GERMANIQUES LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: La revue Études germaniques a pour but d"informer avec un grand souci d"impartialité et d"objectivité scientifique tous ceux qui s"intéressent à la vie du monde germanique (Allemagne, Suisse, pays scandinaves et néerlandais, études yiddish et judéo-allemandes), aussi bien sur des questions qui touchent à la linguistique, à la littérature, à l"histoire, à la philosophie, à l"art, à la religion — en un mot à la civilisation — qu"à celles qui relèvent de l"actualité et qui sont étudiées dans un esprit de savants et non de partisans.
期刊最新文献
Espaces et systèmes des Inscriptiones de Samuel Quiccheberg, point d’ancrage du musée du xxi e siècle ? Le problème de l’éthique et le visage de l’autre. Martin Buber et Emmanuel Levinas en dialogue Canetti als Anti-Nietzsche La volonté de transparence dans la politique muséale des Pays-Bas ou comment apprendre à faire face aux dangers Le plan et le parcours. Guider le visiteur dans la galerie impériale et royale de Vienne à la fin du xviii e siècle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1