克劳斯·施瓦布关于第四次工业革命概念的批判性分析

A.M. KUSHNIR, A.A. KUSHNIR
{"title":"克劳斯·施瓦布关于第四次工业革命概念的批判性分析","authors":"A.M. KUSHNIR, A.A. KUSHNIR","doi":"10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-105-124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the concept of the fourth industrial revolution by K. Schwab and its role in the development of modern societies. It has been established that this concept has a pronounced conservative ideological character and is aimed at preserving and legitimizing the current status quo of privileged social groups, as well as the status quo based on a new system of dispositions. It performs projective-mobilizing, political, evaluative and practical functions aimed at forming a “common understanding” and building an “inclusive and just” society. The sociological content of the theory of industrial revolutions is revealed as an attempt to revise the established theoretical constructs that have lost their empirical adequacy in the changed conditions. It is shown that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is based on evaluative descriptions, has no clear criteria and indicators for its diagnosis. It is argued that in K. Schwab’s interpretation the fourth industrial revolution is indistinguishable from the third one. It is hypothesized that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is not new in content and is a product of “intellectual marketing”. Using the methodology of A. Goudner, the critical analysis is carried out and the non-articulated components that make up the infrastructure of the concept of the fourth industrial revolution are revealed by considering the “role” and “personal” reality of K. Schwab.","PeriodicalId":496479,"journal":{"name":"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF KLAUS SCHWAB’S CONCEPT OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION\",\"authors\":\"A.M. KUSHNIR, A.A. KUSHNIR\",\"doi\":\"10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-105-124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the concept of the fourth industrial revolution by K. Schwab and its role in the development of modern societies. It has been established that this concept has a pronounced conservative ideological character and is aimed at preserving and legitimizing the current status quo of privileged social groups, as well as the status quo based on a new system of dispositions. It performs projective-mobilizing, political, evaluative and practical functions aimed at forming a “common understanding” and building an “inclusive and just” society. The sociological content of the theory of industrial revolutions is revealed as an attempt to revise the established theoretical constructs that have lost their empirical adequacy in the changed conditions. It is shown that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is based on evaluative descriptions, has no clear criteria and indicators for its diagnosis. It is argued that in K. Schwab’s interpretation the fourth industrial revolution is indistinguishable from the third one. It is hypothesized that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is not new in content and is a product of “intellectual marketing”. Using the methodology of A. Goudner, the critical analysis is carried out and the non-articulated components that make up the infrastructure of the concept of the fourth industrial revolution are revealed by considering the “role” and “personal” reality of K. Schwab.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-105-124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialʹno-političeskie nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2023-13-4-105-124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是批判性地分析K.施瓦布提出的第四次工业革命的概念及其在现代社会发展中的作用。人们已经确定,这一概念具有明显的保守意识形态特征,其目的是维护特权社会群体的现状并使之合法化,以及使基于一种新的性格制度的现状合法化。它发挥项目动员、政治、评价和实践职能,旨在形成“共识”和建立一个“包容和公正”的社会。工业革命理论的社会学内容被揭示为试图修正在变化的条件下失去其经验充分性的既定理论结构。研究表明,第四次工业革命的概念是基于评价性描述的,没有明确的诊断标准和指标。有人认为,在施瓦布的解释中,第四次工业革命与第三次工业革命是没有区别的。假设第四次工业革命的概念在内容上并不新鲜,是“知识营销”的产物。采用A. Goudner的方法论,进行批判性分析,并通过考虑K. Schwab的“角色”和“个人”现实,揭示构成第四次工业革命概念基础设施的非连接组件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF KLAUS SCHWAB’S CONCEPT OF THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
The purpose of this study is to critically analyze the concept of the fourth industrial revolution by K. Schwab and its role in the development of modern societies. It has been established that this concept has a pronounced conservative ideological character and is aimed at preserving and legitimizing the current status quo of privileged social groups, as well as the status quo based on a new system of dispositions. It performs projective-mobilizing, political, evaluative and practical functions aimed at forming a “common understanding” and building an “inclusive and just” society. The sociological content of the theory of industrial revolutions is revealed as an attempt to revise the established theoretical constructs that have lost their empirical adequacy in the changed conditions. It is shown that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is based on evaluative descriptions, has no clear criteria and indicators for its diagnosis. It is argued that in K. Schwab’s interpretation the fourth industrial revolution is indistinguishable from the third one. It is hypothesized that the concept of the fourth industrial revolution is not new in content and is a product of “intellectual marketing”. Using the methodology of A. Goudner, the critical analysis is carried out and the non-articulated components that make up the infrastructure of the concept of the fourth industrial revolution are revealed by considering the “role” and “personal” reality of K. Schwab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SOCIO-CULTURAL ASPECTS OF THE TRANSFORMATION OF NATIONAL IDENTITY IN THE POST-SOVIET PERIOD: SOCIO-POLITICAL ANALYSIS PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF NARCISSISM DIMENSION OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN RUSSIAN IDENTITY OF THE PAST AND PRESENT RUSSIA 2020: INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES INTERCULTURAL DIALOGUE IN THE DIGITAL SPACE AS A FACTOR OF SOCIO-POLITICAL STABILITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1