{"title":"“美国中亚战略”的演变及其制约因素","authors":"Shen Xiaochen","doi":"10.31166/voprosyistorii202310statyi31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essence of the development of five successive US strategies for the Central Asia during the past 30 years was the evolution of America's strategic perception, instead of its absolute strategic capability in this area. In the implementation of its strategic perception, US strategic planning toward the Central Asia went through four stages of evolution, while changed its strategic boundary from “two Central Asia” to “one Central Asia”.","PeriodicalId":46064,"journal":{"name":"VOPROSY ISTORII","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution and limiting factors of the “US Strategy for Central Asia”\",\"authors\":\"Shen Xiaochen\",\"doi\":\"10.31166/voprosyistorii202310statyi31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essence of the development of five successive US strategies for the Central Asia during the past 30 years was the evolution of America's strategic perception, instead of its absolute strategic capability in this area. In the implementation of its strategic perception, US strategic planning toward the Central Asia went through four stages of evolution, while changed its strategic boundary from “two Central Asia” to “one Central Asia”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VOPROSY ISTORII\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VOPROSY ISTORII\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31166/voprosyistorii202310statyi31\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOPROSY ISTORII","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31166/voprosyistorii202310statyi31","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evolution and limiting factors of the “US Strategy for Central Asia”
The essence of the development of five successive US strategies for the Central Asia during the past 30 years was the evolution of America's strategic perception, instead of its absolute strategic capability in this area. In the implementation of its strategic perception, US strategic planning toward the Central Asia went through four stages of evolution, while changed its strategic boundary from “two Central Asia” to “one Central Asia”.