印度独立以来的经济增长与发展:回顾

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS Indian Journal of Economics and Development Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.35716/ijed-23092
{"title":"印度独立以来的经济增长与发展:回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.35716/ijed-23092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A voluminous literature notwithstanding, a widely shared consensus still needs to be discovered in India's economic growth and development discourses. This study attempted to critically engage with the extant literature on economic growth and development in India. For doing so, the study devised an analytical framework wherein the extant body of literature is dichotomised into conventional and non-conventional narratives. The much-trumpeted rhetoric of either pro-market or anti-market appeared a false dichotomy. Instead, the obtained dichotomy was that of market-complimenting and market-supplementing. Hence, the mainstream debate on economic growth and development in India since independence had never been between orthodox and heterodox economics. The argumentation had always located itself firmly within the orthodoxy of neoclassical economics. India's economic growth and development analysis appeared to be in flux to this day. Moreover, the hegemony of orthodox economics is yet to be challenged in any consequential way.","PeriodicalId":43367,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Growth and Development in India Since Independence: A Review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35716/ijed-23092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A voluminous literature notwithstanding, a widely shared consensus still needs to be discovered in India's economic growth and development discourses. This study attempted to critically engage with the extant literature on economic growth and development in India. For doing so, the study devised an analytical framework wherein the extant body of literature is dichotomised into conventional and non-conventional narratives. The much-trumpeted rhetoric of either pro-market or anti-market appeared a false dichotomy. Instead, the obtained dichotomy was that of market-complimenting and market-supplementing. Hence, the mainstream debate on economic growth and development in India since independence had never been between orthodox and heterodox economics. The argumentation had always located itself firmly within the orthodoxy of neoclassical economics. India's economic growth and development analysis appeared to be in flux to this day. Moreover, the hegemony of orthodox economics is yet to be challenged in any consequential way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Economics and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Economics and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed-23092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Economics and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35716/ijed-23092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有大量的文献,但在印度的经济增长和发展论述中,仍然需要找到一个广泛共享的共识。本研究试图批判性地与现存的关于印度经济增长和发展的文献进行接触。为此,该研究设计了一个分析框架,其中现存的文学主体被分为传统和非传统叙事。被大肆宣扬的支持市场或反对市场的言论似乎是一种错误的二分法。相反,得到的二分法是市场恭维和市场补充。因此,自印度独立以来,关于经济增长和发展的主流辩论从未在正统经济学和非正统经济学之间展开。这一论点始终牢牢地定位在新古典经济学的正统之中。印度的经济增长和发展分析似乎一直在不断变化。此外,正统经济学的霸权尚未受到任何相应方式的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Growth and Development in India Since Independence: A Review
A voluminous literature notwithstanding, a widely shared consensus still needs to be discovered in India's economic growth and development discourses. This study attempted to critically engage with the extant literature on economic growth and development in India. For doing so, the study devised an analytical framework wherein the extant body of literature is dichotomised into conventional and non-conventional narratives. The much-trumpeted rhetoric of either pro-market or anti-market appeared a false dichotomy. Instead, the obtained dichotomy was that of market-complimenting and market-supplementing. Hence, the mainstream debate on economic growth and development in India since independence had never been between orthodox and heterodox economics. The argumentation had always located itself firmly within the orthodoxy of neoclassical economics. India's economic growth and development analysis appeared to be in flux to this day. Moreover, the hegemony of orthodox economics is yet to be challenged in any consequential way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Decomposition of Changing Maize Production Profile in Indian States Value Chain Analysis of Kinnow in Southwestern and Sub-Mountainous Zones of Punjab Assessment of Variability and Seasonal Patterns in Lemon Arrivals and Prices across India Supply Chain Analysis of Organic Farm Produce in Punjab Total Factor Productivity Growth in the Indian Food Processing Industry: A Non-parametric Investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1