对可用性测试(UT)和页面内分析在电子商务中的补充使用的建议

Q3 Engineering Journal of Design Research Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399
Soo Bin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee
{"title":"对可用性测试(UT)和页面内分析在电子商务中的补充使用的建议","authors":"Soo Bin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee","doi":"10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.","PeriodicalId":35082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suggestions for complementary uses of usability testing (UT) and in-page analytics for e-commerce\",\"authors\":\"Soo Bin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在研究对许多组织变得越来越重要的时候,本研究旨在就如何使用页内分析定量数据作为可用性评估定性数据的补充提供建议。研究方法是通过使用可用性评估和页面内分析的案例研究来分析定量报告和定性报告之间的差异,并提出互补的方法来使用它们。为了同时利用定性可用性评估和定量页内分析数据,我们选择了国内电商领域的年糕品牌“100yearshop”和支持国内数据可视化工具的服务“Beusable”,从对新用户进行的可用性评估中收集定性数据,并通过Beusable服务收集和分析用户在一定时间内的实时数据和积累定量数据。通过以上两种方法收集的数据,我们得出了可用性评估和页面内分析结果的差异,并将可用性评估和页面内分析结果分解为设计、实施和分析三个阶段,提出了一种在电子商务领域互补使用可用性评估和页面内分析结果的方法。我们期望由此产生的方法“电子商务可用性评估和页面内分析工具的补充使用建议”通过应用于实际工作,在实践中是合适和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Suggestions for complementary uses of usability testing (UT) and in-page analytics for e-commerce
At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Design Research
Journal of Design Research Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: JDR is an interdisciplinary journal, emphasising human aspects as a central issue of design through integrative studies of social sciences and design disciplines. Originally published as an electronic journal publishing articles including multimedia applications and hence allowing visual knowledge transfer, it is now also available in print. Topics covered include Expertise in design Design learning strategies and design pedagogy Design as a social process Gaming and simulation in design Designing user interfaces The role of visual techniques in the design process Design tools Sustainability.
期刊最新文献
An Analysis Study of Implicit Visual Symbols in Movie Poster: Focusing on Korean Action Movies A Proposal for UI Design of Educational Apps for Children's Affordances: focusing on the analysis cases of Chinese art education apps Reducing the Use of Smart Devices Before Bedtime through design intervention A Study on the Characteristics of Immersive Spatial Representation in teamLab’s Media Art Research on Healing Agriculture Service Design Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1