{"title":"对可用性测试(UT)和页面内分析在电子商务中的补充使用的建议","authors":"Soo Bin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee","doi":"10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.","PeriodicalId":35082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Design Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suggestions for complementary uses of usability testing (UT) and in-page analytics for e-commerce\",\"authors\":\"Soo Bin Lee, Ji Hyun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46248/kidrs.2023.3.399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Suggestions for complementary uses of usability testing (UT) and in-page analytics for e-commerce
At a time when research is becoming increasingly important to many organizations, this study aims to provide suggestions on how to use in-page analysis quantitative data as a complement to usability evaluation qualitative data. The research methodology was to analyze the differences between quantitative and qualitative reports through a case study that utilized both usability evaluation and in-page analysis and to come up with complementary ways to use them. To utilize both qualitative usability evaluation and quantitative in-page analysis data, we selected '100yearshop,' a rice cake brand in the domestic e-commerce sector, and 'Beusable,' a service that supports domestic data visualization tools, and collected qualitative data from a usability evaluation conducted with new users, and collected and analyzed real-time data and accumulated quantitative data from users through the Beusable service at a certain time. By utilizing the data collected through the above two methods, we derived the differences between usability evaluation and in-page analysis results and proposed a method for complementary use of usability evaluation and in-page analysis results in the field of e-commerce by breaking it down into the design, implementation, and analysis stages. We expect that the resulting method, “Proposal for Complementary Use of Usability Evaluation and In-Page Analysis Tools for E-commerce,” will be suitable and effective in practice by applying it to actual work.
期刊介绍:
JDR is an interdisciplinary journal, emphasising human aspects as a central issue of design through integrative studies of social sciences and design disciplines. Originally published as an electronic journal publishing articles including multimedia applications and hence allowing visual knowledge transfer, it is now also available in print. Topics covered include Expertise in design Design learning strategies and design pedagogy Design as a social process Gaming and simulation in design Designing user interfaces The role of visual techniques in the design process Design tools Sustainability.