对英国大学-产业合作的实证调查:影响框架的发展

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Journal of Technology Transfer Pub Date : 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9
David Bamford, Iain Reid, Paul Forrester, Benjamin Dehe, Jim Bamford, Marina Papalexi
{"title":"对英国大学-产业合作的实证调查:影响框架的发展","authors":"David Bamford, Iain Reid, Paul Forrester, Benjamin Dehe, Jim Bamford, Marina Papalexi","doi":"10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Providing evidence of the impact of university–industry (U–I) partnerships is challenging. This empirical research contributes to this thought-provoking subject area by developing an impact assessment framework to assess the effect of collaboration between university and industry. This is examined through a multiple case study approach: 13 partnership schemes, each of two years duration, in manufacturing and healthcare. This study demonstrates that effective knowledge transfer from universities to enterprises is not only hypothetically feasible, but also realistically tangible and measurable. It explores how Business and Management Schools transfer knowledge and technology through external interventions and formal partnership schemes. Our findings show that impact and knowledge transfer can be evaluated, but requires active facilitation before, during and after the project, plus a level of openness and expert engagement within the partnerships. Additionally, our findings established that healthcare partnerships generated higher perceived levels of impact than manufacturing. This perhaps indicates that further work is necessary to resolve the issues limiting the productivity gains of manufacturing partnerships.","PeriodicalId":48228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technology Transfer","volume":"65 29","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework\",\"authors\":\"David Bamford, Iain Reid, Paul Forrester, Benjamin Dehe, Jim Bamford, Marina Papalexi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Providing evidence of the impact of university–industry (U–I) partnerships is challenging. This empirical research contributes to this thought-provoking subject area by developing an impact assessment framework to assess the effect of collaboration between university and industry. This is examined through a multiple case study approach: 13 partnership schemes, each of two years duration, in manufacturing and healthcare. This study demonstrates that effective knowledge transfer from universities to enterprises is not only hypothetically feasible, but also realistically tangible and measurable. It explores how Business and Management Schools transfer knowledge and technology through external interventions and formal partnership schemes. Our findings show that impact and knowledge transfer can be evaluated, but requires active facilitation before, during and after the project, plus a level of openness and expert engagement within the partnerships. Additionally, our findings established that healthcare partnerships generated higher perceived levels of impact than manufacturing. This perhaps indicates that further work is necessary to resolve the issues limiting the productivity gains of manufacturing partnerships.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Technology Transfer\",\"volume\":\"65 29\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Technology Transfer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technology Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10043-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供大学与产业(U-I)合作关系影响的证据是具有挑战性的。本实证研究通过建立影响评估框架来评估校企合作的效果,为这一发人深省的主题领域做出了贡献。这是通过多案例研究方法进行检查的:13个合作伙伴计划,每个为期两年,在制造业和医疗保健领域。研究表明,高校向企业的有效知识转移不仅具有假设可行性,而且具有现实的可操作性和可测量性。它探讨了工商管理学院如何通过外部干预和正式合作计划转移知识和技术。我们的研究结果表明,影响和知识转移是可以评估的,但需要在项目之前、期间和之后积极促进,以及伙伴关系内部一定程度的开放性和专家参与。此外,我们的研究结果表明,医疗保健合作伙伴关系产生的感知影响水平高于制造业。这可能表明,需要进一步的工作来解决限制制造业伙伴关系生产率提高的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework
Abstract Providing evidence of the impact of university–industry (U–I) partnerships is challenging. This empirical research contributes to this thought-provoking subject area by developing an impact assessment framework to assess the effect of collaboration between university and industry. This is examined through a multiple case study approach: 13 partnership schemes, each of two years duration, in manufacturing and healthcare. This study demonstrates that effective knowledge transfer from universities to enterprises is not only hypothetically feasible, but also realistically tangible and measurable. It explores how Business and Management Schools transfer knowledge and technology through external interventions and formal partnership schemes. Our findings show that impact and knowledge transfer can be evaluated, but requires active facilitation before, during and after the project, plus a level of openness and expert engagement within the partnerships. Additionally, our findings established that healthcare partnerships generated higher perceived levels of impact than manufacturing. This perhaps indicates that further work is necessary to resolve the issues limiting the productivity gains of manufacturing partnerships.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: The Journal of Technology Transfer provides an international forum for research on the economic, managerial and policy implication of technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and innovation. The Journal is especially interested in articles that focus on the relationship between the external environment and organizations (governments, public agencies, firms, universities) and their innovation process. The Journal welcomes alternative modes of presentation ranging from broad empirical analyses, to theoretical models, to case studies based on theoretical foundations.  Officially cited as: J Technol Transf
期刊最新文献
An empirical investigation into UK university–industry collaboration: the development of an impact framework Supply chain constraints and research spending: an international investigation A micro-level study of research impact and motivational diversity Public biofoundries as innovation intermediaries: the integration of translation, sustainability, and responsibility Analysis of factors influencing attitude and intention to use electric vehicles for a sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1