在家工作的成功是一个配置问题吗?-用PLS-SEM对比美国和德国

IF 2.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Corporate Real Estate Pub Date : 2023-10-10 DOI:10.1108/jcre-03-2023-0010
Kyra Voll, Andreas Pfnür
{"title":"在家工作的成功是一个配置问题吗?-用PLS-SEM对比美国和德国","authors":"Kyra Voll, Andreas Pfnür","doi":"10.1108/jcre-03-2023-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The world of work is constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced working from home, and there is an increasing demand for flexibility regarding the workplace. There is little empirical evidence on the mechanisms and factors that influence employee outcomes, such as productivity and turnover intention, at the workplace and at home. In addition, it is unclear whether the workplace characteristics that influence employee outcomes vary between different nations due to country-specific circumstances. The paper aims to address these two issues. Design/methodology/approach The research model applied in this study is based on the job demands-resources (JD-R) and environmental demands-resources models using German ( n = 429) and USA ( n = 507) survey samples. Partial least squares structural equation modelling is used to analyse the influence of workplace characteristics (isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety) on employee outcomes (satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention). Additionally, a multi-group analysis is used to explore group differences in the factors influencing satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention between employees in Germany and the USA. Findings The results reveal that significant determinants of productivity and turnover intention include isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety. Isolation and equipment/facilities are identified as the most important demands and resources of the home workplace. Some significant differences are found between Germany and the USA. The positive effect of isolation on burnout is significantly stronger in the USA than in Germany, whereas the positive effect of family–work inference on burnout is stronger in Germany than in the USA. The negative effects visible for the relations between burnout and satisfaction, and satisfaction and turnover intention are stronger in Germany than in the USA. The positive effect of burnout on turnover intention is stronger in the USA compared to Germany. Originality/value The study adds empirical evidence to the JD-R theory by analysing the influence of the home workplace characteristics on employee outcomes in different countries for the first time using a multi-group analysis. In addition, the study reveals new insights into the differences between the knowledge workforces in Germany and the USA by uncovering how key factors influence employee outcomes such as productivity and turnover intention, partially carried by varying length of experience in work from home between both of these countries. Insights from this study can support corporate real estate managers to make better decisions on the design of employees’ home workplaces and the integration of work from home into the company’s workspace concept.","PeriodicalId":45969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the success of working from home a matter of configuration? – a comparison between the USA and Germany using PLS-SEM\",\"authors\":\"Kyra Voll, Andreas Pfnür\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jcre-03-2023-0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The world of work is constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced working from home, and there is an increasing demand for flexibility regarding the workplace. There is little empirical evidence on the mechanisms and factors that influence employee outcomes, such as productivity and turnover intention, at the workplace and at home. In addition, it is unclear whether the workplace characteristics that influence employee outcomes vary between different nations due to country-specific circumstances. The paper aims to address these two issues. Design/methodology/approach The research model applied in this study is based on the job demands-resources (JD-R) and environmental demands-resources models using German ( n = 429) and USA ( n = 507) survey samples. Partial least squares structural equation modelling is used to analyse the influence of workplace characteristics (isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety) on employee outcomes (satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention). Additionally, a multi-group analysis is used to explore group differences in the factors influencing satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention between employees in Germany and the USA. Findings The results reveal that significant determinants of productivity and turnover intention include isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety. Isolation and equipment/facilities are identified as the most important demands and resources of the home workplace. Some significant differences are found between Germany and the USA. The positive effect of isolation on burnout is significantly stronger in the USA than in Germany, whereas the positive effect of family–work inference on burnout is stronger in Germany than in the USA. The negative effects visible for the relations between burnout and satisfaction, and satisfaction and turnover intention are stronger in Germany than in the USA. The positive effect of burnout on turnover intention is stronger in the USA compared to Germany. Originality/value The study adds empirical evidence to the JD-R theory by analysing the influence of the home workplace characteristics on employee outcomes in different countries for the first time using a multi-group analysis. In addition, the study reveals new insights into the differences between the knowledge workforces in Germany and the USA by uncovering how key factors influence employee outcomes such as productivity and turnover intention, partially carried by varying length of experience in work from home between both of these countries. Insights from this study can support corporate real estate managers to make better decisions on the design of employees’ home workplaces and the integration of work from home into the company’s workspace concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Real Estate\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Real Estate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-03-2023-0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Real Estate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcre-03-2023-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工作的世界是不断变化的。COVID-19大流行加强了在家工作,对工作场所灵活性的需求越来越大。在工作场所和家庭中,关于影响员工产出(如生产力和离职意愿)的机制和因素的实证证据很少。此外,由于各国的具体情况,影响员工工作成果的工作场所特征是否在不同国家之间有所不同,目前尚不清楚。本文旨在解决这两个问题。本研究应用的研究模型基于工作需求-资源(JD-R)和环境需求-资源模型,使用德国(n = 429)和美国(n = 507)调查样本。偏最小二乘结构方程模型用于分析工作场所特征(隔离,家庭工作干扰,设备/设施和技能多样性)对员工结果(满意度,倦怠,生产力和离职意愿)的影响。此外,本研究采用多组分析的方法探讨了德国和美国员工满意度、职业倦怠、生产力和离职倾向影响因素的组间差异。研究结果表明,隔离、家庭-工作干扰、设备/设施和技能多样性是影响员工生产力和离职意愿的重要因素。隔离和设备/设施被确定为家庭工作场所最重要的需求和资源。德国和美国之间存在一些显著的差异。孤立对职业倦怠的正向影响在美国显著强于德国,而家庭工作推断对职业倦怠的正向影响在德国显著强于美国。倦怠与满意度、满意度与离职倾向之间的负向效应在德国明显强于美国。倦怠对离职倾向的正向影响在美国强于德国。独创性/价值本研究首次采用多组分析方法分析了不同国家家庭工作场所特征对员工绩效的影响,为JD-R理论增加了经验证据。此外,该研究还揭示了德国和美国知识型劳动力之间差异的新见解,揭示了影响员工成果的关键因素,如生产率和离职意愿,部分原因是两国在家工作的经验长短不同。本研究的见解可以支持企业房地产经理在员工家庭工作场所的设计和将家庭工作融入公司的工作空间概念方面做出更好的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is the success of working from home a matter of configuration? – a comparison between the USA and Germany using PLS-SEM
Purpose The world of work is constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced working from home, and there is an increasing demand for flexibility regarding the workplace. There is little empirical evidence on the mechanisms and factors that influence employee outcomes, such as productivity and turnover intention, at the workplace and at home. In addition, it is unclear whether the workplace characteristics that influence employee outcomes vary between different nations due to country-specific circumstances. The paper aims to address these two issues. Design/methodology/approach The research model applied in this study is based on the job demands-resources (JD-R) and environmental demands-resources models using German ( n = 429) and USA ( n = 507) survey samples. Partial least squares structural equation modelling is used to analyse the influence of workplace characteristics (isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety) on employee outcomes (satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention). Additionally, a multi-group analysis is used to explore group differences in the factors influencing satisfaction, burnout, productivity and turnover intention between employees in Germany and the USA. Findings The results reveal that significant determinants of productivity and turnover intention include isolation, family–work interference, equipment/facilities and skill variety. Isolation and equipment/facilities are identified as the most important demands and resources of the home workplace. Some significant differences are found between Germany and the USA. The positive effect of isolation on burnout is significantly stronger in the USA than in Germany, whereas the positive effect of family–work inference on burnout is stronger in Germany than in the USA. The negative effects visible for the relations between burnout and satisfaction, and satisfaction and turnover intention are stronger in Germany than in the USA. The positive effect of burnout on turnover intention is stronger in the USA compared to Germany. Originality/value The study adds empirical evidence to the JD-R theory by analysing the influence of the home workplace characteristics on employee outcomes in different countries for the first time using a multi-group analysis. In addition, the study reveals new insights into the differences between the knowledge workforces in Germany and the USA by uncovering how key factors influence employee outcomes such as productivity and turnover intention, partially carried by varying length of experience in work from home between both of these countries. Insights from this study can support corporate real estate managers to make better decisions on the design of employees’ home workplaces and the integration of work from home into the company’s workspace concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Choosing where to work: an empirical study of collaborative activities’ impact on workspace choice behavior Open-plan office employees’ perceived mental and social well-being A comprehensive analysis of the implications of artificial intelligence adoption on employee social well-being in South African facility management organizations Knowledge work productivity in an activity-based workplace: a comparative analysis The predictive power of prior attitudes: understanding employee workspace satisfaction in activity-based work environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1